1) All-UK for customs on NI backstop, but accept SM checks unique to NI, with some de-dramatised checks (for regs) on NI-GB border.
2) To move to park the NI customs backstop stand-off by agreeing a "Temporary Customs Arrangement" /3
@SamuelMarcLowe@JohnSpringford@CER_EU The TCA will seek the UK accept common external tariff, and necessary elements of EU Common Commercial Policy (CCP) to cover goods, but leave door open for UK to negotiate on services.
All this, while leaving door open to a future fix on Irish border. /4
@SamuelMarcLowe@JohnSpringford@CER_EU Bloomberg reported a version of yesterday too, then @oliver_wright at The Times put a political gloss on this from #CPC18 pointing out it would constrain UK trade deal making until such time as the 'new regime' came in. /5
As I reported on Steph Riso's July 5 presentation, the C'ion has argued it could cost the SAME as a 'no deal' to the UK. /7 telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/…
My own enquiries in Berlin, Paris, Brussels make me doubt this. /8
@SamuelMarcLowe@JohnSpringford@CER_EU@oliver_wright@CER_Grant When you bounce these concessions off the EU - as a mechanism to obtain essentially a 'single market' for goods with a derogation on free movement, officials blanche. Literally. They worry UK "doesn't get it" (as at Salzburg) and is staking political capital on the impossible /9
I understand UK accepts that GB-EU27 UK businesses get nothing on single market reg fixes. So friction. /14
@SamuelMarcLowe@JohnSpringford@CER_EU@oliver_wright@CER_Grant@EurasiaGroup So let's say May gets a deal which amounts to accepting a lot of Single Market regs, a Customs Union in all but name, and a free movement carve-out (recalling that UK is a NON member, so arguably not sending message to members, given frictions noted above) what then? /15
Yesterday @simoncoveney was talking "flexibility". /1
@eucopresident@campaignforleo@simoncoveney Then this morning, the FT reported that Ireland was prepared to back British proposal for all-UK customs arrangement on the backstop /2
@eucopresident@campaignforleo@simoncoveney This wasn't surprising. Always been Dublin ambition, but clearly they need to balance need to preserve UK-IE trade, with being good EU27 citizens and defending integrity of single market.
The Irish FT briefing was seen as a sign of helpfulness on UK side.
Now it seems like the British government also issued her a visa.
The fitness of the Polish judicial system is already under review relating to the European Arrest Warrant.
Now it seems like Germany and UK are not showing solidarity with Poland on Schengen Information System./2
The activist says she's in trouble because of a Facebook post her husband made calling for peaceful civil disobedience against Poland judicial reforms.
Poland justified the ban saying her NGO has "opaque" funding. /3
Let's be clear, there has been some silly stuff from both sides - @EmmanuelMacron should know better that talking about "liars" and @eucopresident trolling May on Instagram is also pretty daft. /2
@EmmanuelMacron@eucopresident But divorces get like this: both sides know the mud-slinging it is counter-productive, "bad for the kids" but still can't help themselves.
Jeremy Hunt's speech was pretty much student union level stuff, as has been pointed out. /3
@BorisJohnson And when you read it in that light, it becomes rather more persuasive.
Brexit is indeed a muddle and a mess. The British frog is indeed being boiled. Brexit probably always was/is more binary than both sides have properly allowed. /2
@BorisJohnson I am not at all sure Boris is right that Whitehall and the EU conspired to keep the UK in a customs union, for example, but that will be a powerful anti-narrative if that's where we end up.
FWIW my conversations in Europe suggest rather different. /3
These divisions were always over-reported and over-spun by No-10. Yes, some say different but in 27 context (viz Orban last week) they don’t. And drill down with their dips on how far they really support splitting freedoms? Not so much. I’ve tried. Doesn’t stack up IMO.
Then May/No10 over reads what she gets told in bilaterals (where she is wooden and hopeless) and takes what one EU dip from big EU state said to me were “mere generalities, pleasantries” about “wanting a deal” for a willingness to cross major red lines. Salzburg says not.
May’s problem is that she’s asking for special treatment in the Trump-Orban-Salvini era and Macron’s people says he sees Brexit in that sweep. As does Commission and Berlin (though less aggressively) which makes U.K. pitch v hard.
The Salzburg summit looms, Raab plays to home crowd over the #Brexit bill, everyone 'wants' a deal ...but yet no-one can explain what it will look like.
So what is happening with #Brexit? Some thoughts after chats with both sides. 1/Thread
The first point is that the clock is ticking, but time is standing still.
Raab talks about "good progress" but actually talks are at a standstill. He bounces around looking all perky and boxerly, but there's isn't much to say. On the tough stuff anyway. /2
Barnier says divorce deal is "80%" done, and deal can be clinched in 6-8 weeks IF the Brits are "realistic".
Markets jump for joy, but they overlook that "IF" and what Barnier means by "realistic".