Possibly more for me than for you, let's try to pull this week together a bit:
1/
Let's start with the EU side
Having largely kept heads down during conference season, yesterday's Tusk/Varadkar presser demonstrated that EU is keeping the pressure on
2/
The tension seems to be between COM/EUCO and IE, as @pmdfoster explained well yesterday: IE making conciliatory noises, central EU bodies pushing EU integrity line
However, there does seem to be a bit more positivity on EU side about all this, although much hangs on what May presents as text
4/
So let's swing over to the UK
This week was mainly about survival for May: never was going to be much substantial mvt, just fending off CON pressures at #CFC18
5/
In that, she seemed to do OK: Johnson was a way off being fatal, ERG has stuck at sniping and final speech went down well (possibly because she didn't use the C word)
6/
What's less clear is whether she can switch from the party mgt thing to the Art.50 negotiation thing. In particular, can she produce text to move on the talks on Irish dimension?
7/
That's been promised since Salzburg, but it's not leaked, so either it's a super-tight circle holding it (which'll cause issues for CON buy-in later on) or it's not written yet
If it's the latter, then someone's got a very busy weekend
8/
Perhaps the thing that continues to disquiet me is the disconnect of UK-EU and internal-UK dynamics: each is aware of the other, but doesn't actively seek outcomes that can fly for them.
9/
Obviously, part of May's work is wrangling that, but she's still doing it implicitly, rather than explicitly, which means assumptions are not always getting checked or picked up
10/
A final curiosity.
Tusk flew the Canada +++ kite yesterday, in what was a very deliberate waving of red flags to the ERG types
11/
What he didn't stress (although it was said) was that this still comes with the IE backstop, which remains anathematic to those same people
12/
Back in Sept, there was much talk about this being a crunch point in the UK debate, as May would come under fire for Chequers and there would be scope for changes/realignments/whatever
2/
Certainly that first bit has happened, with numerous op-eds over the weekend and assorted fringe events (inc. yesterday's Johnson speech)
3/
@politicshome Essentially, we're back in "Australian points-based system" territory
Don't sweat the details, but trust my plan with the Anglo-friendly name and show some bulldog spirit
@politicshome As a challenge to May, it's got legs (because it's Johnson and because he can articulate much of the unhappiness others feel towards her)