There are many inconsistencies, or even outright lies, when it comes to the "story" outlined by #ChristineBlaseyFord. Here are a few:
# people at party
# timing/year of party
# location of party
# never mentioned Kavanaugh by name until July 2018
# layout of party
# your self-identified "witnesses" all refute that they attended any such party
# your long-time friend #LelandKeyser further states she has never met #JudgeKavanaugh
# you never mentioned this assault to anyone prior to 2012 therapy session...including during long-term relationship
# you claimed the revelation of abuse came from a therapy session in 2012 w/your husband, prompted by an argument over wanting 2 front doors to your home...
with this demand for a second front entrance due to an unconscious desire to have another way to "escape" your home. This supposedly occurred during a large house renovation in 2012...
yet public records prove this work was completed years earlier (issued a permit for work in 2008 permit; photos prove work completed by 2011 at latest). Further, purpose of door was a 2nd entrance for a business and/or for renters...to allow you to rent your home to strangers!
# you claimed you NEVER helped "somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test"...yet your ex-boyfriend wrote, under penalty of perjury, that he witnessed you doing this for your best friend and roommate, #MonicaMcLean, who was applying for an FBI job.
# You and/or your attorneys pushed back the hearing date due to a publicly-stated fear of flying...yet you fly regularly (business + pleasure), your ex-boyfriend describes flying to Hawaii, incl. in a single-prop small plane, AND you FLEW to DC (your testimony) for the hearing.
# You were given the offer, very publicly, to have the hearing held where you live, so as to avoid the need to travel/fly...yet you acted as if this were new information at the hearing. Were you lying...or should your attorneys be disbarred for provably unethical behavior?
# You claimed the alleged attack produced a fear of confined spaces, such as within planes, which has already been debunked, and your ex-boyfriend provided further proof of this lie:
She had no problem living in a "very small" apartment (500 sq. ft.), with one door
# You claim to want the truth to be revealed and that this is not politically-motivated, yet you actively scrubbed your social media accounts, hid published articles/papers, and refuse to release your therapist's notes or details from the "polygraph" exam...
which may be the MOST INTERESTING item that you have tried to hide. In your testimony, you reveal the following elements:
- Polygraph exam references a handwritten note, which shows MANY cross outs/corrections. It's a changing document that is the central reference for questions.
- You claim never to have helped anyone w/a polygraph, but your specific career background and an under-oath signed statement by a long-time boyfriend indicate that this is a lie. Why lie about this?
- You decided to take this test at a time you claim you wished to be anonymous!
- You claim a detailed, 100% recollection of Kavanaugh as the person involved in your "1982" assault, yet you cannot recall if you gave WaPo your therapist's notes or if you had been at the funeral of your grandmother the day of the polygraph on August 7??
- "Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?" "I don't think so." So Ford is saying that we should trust her memory going back 36 years, and she can't answer this simple question??
- And this:
"I remember being hooked up to a machine, like, be — being placed onto my body, and being asked a lot of questions, and crying a lot."
Crying during a polygraph makes any results invalid.
The BIGGER POINT IS THIS>>I remember...being asked a LOT OF QUESTIONS...
Ford was officially ASKED TWO questions, neither one specifically asking about the details of her alleged event...and each question SPECIFICALLY AVOIDING the naming of Kavanaugh.
The two questions asked were VERY generic:

"Is any part of your statement false?" [The statement was hand-written, with many cross outs and changes.]
"Did you make up any part of your statement?"

How then can Ford claim that she was asked a LOT OF QUESTIONS???
The answer helps tie it all together. One way to beat a polygraph is to simply ask the same question MANY times UNTIL you get the desired response. TWO questions can become THIRTY very easily when this is the case.

"I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be."

Now we know why they refuse to release the video/audio and details from the entire polygraph episode as it would expose their lie. Now we know how to interpret this post from #QAnon...The More You Know…


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with #RedOctober-ArrestsAreImminent

#RedOctober-ArrestsAreImminent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ObamaTruth1

Oct 8, 2018

#JudgeKavanaugh #TRUTH

Given the spin in the media and by leftist Hollywood/celebs + skewed (or fabricated) polls , it can sometimes be hard to know where the public stands on an issue. People tend to live in their "bubble" and get affirmed w/in their own echo chamber.

While this is not a scientific method, I thought I would analyze data available on Twitter, which is open to all people but is known to skew things to the left, to see what the numbers tell us about support for or opposition to #JudgeKavanaugh.

My method was simple. To avoid being "served" input from within my bubble, I did this analysis anonymously while logged out of Twitter. I pulled the 15 top results served by Twitter on a search of "Kavanaugh" and compiled these results, which are VERY interesting.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
#QAnon Update

I wanted to post this update to give a quick interpretation to #Q's latest posts this evening.

In 2017, Q had posted about "The Hunt for Red October."
Those who have read Tom Clancy know this is a reference to the great novel about a cat-and-mouse game involving a Russian nuclear sub that is looking to defect to the US.

So what did Q mean in this and the many other references to Red October?
When the phrase included "The Hunt for"...Q was giving a clue that it was a reference to a rogue nuclear sub, likely the one that went missing from North Korea in 2017. It was being controlled by the #DeepState.

Recall the "false" [not false] Hawaiian Jan 2018 missile alert.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
#QCLock Theory

#Q's posts are monitored by both #Patriots & the #DeepState, so Q cannot telegraph every move. However, there's seems to be a clock in place, w/post numbers essentially acting as a countdown to 2400...midnight for the #cabal...w/a planned #RedOctober take down.
#RedOctober has clearly referenced a timeline where the coordinated arrests will occur this month, prior to the 2018 election.

"Red October" was first referenced on 11/20/17 as "The Hunt for Red October."
"Red October" has appeared 20 times in #Q's posts.

The reference to "The Hunt for Red October" was thought to have many meanings:
- Dealing w/a rogue nuclear sub (think Hawaii)
- Cyberespionage malware
- The plan culmination in the plan in October 2018 (#RedOctober)
Read 8 tweets
Oct 5, 2018

Happy Anniversary to #TheStorm! One year ago today, #POTUS announced to a confused press corps: “This is the calm before the storm!“

Those who have done their own research, or who are lucky enough to have discovered #QAnon, know what was meant by the reference to “The Storm.” It is now upon us, and the Deep State is in full panic mode.

Many months ago, some smart anons who are very good at seeing patterns discovered that #Q”s posts seem to relate to a clock dial in terms of timing. The dates of posts and the post numbers sometimes contain their own meaning.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 1, 2018
"Trust the Plan."
"Trust Wray."
"Sky is Falling Week."

Let's interpret.
Anyone who supports #JudgeKavanaugh should not be concerned w/a one week investigation as long as:
- #POTUS has control over the rogue #FBI.
- #RuleofLaw is restored.
The #WhiteHats are now in contol...including of the #FBI. Witness the ouster and/or referral for prosecution of #Comey, #McCabe, #Strzok, #Page, #JamesBaker, et al (T makes it hard to ID ALL of the traitors).
Read 8 tweets
Sep 27, 2018
Quick analysis of smear campaign against #JudgeKavanaugh:
1. #Ford's accusation is LITTERED w/contradictions and lacks a SINGLE PIECE of corroboration. See:
2. #DeborahRamirez' claims were so unsubstantiated, w/o credibility or corroboration, that the #NYT REFUSED to publish an article about them. Ramirez admitted she only recalled that "Kavanaugh had exposed himself" after SIX DAYS of consulting her attorney.
3. Accuser # 3, #JulieSwetnick, incredibly waited until YESTERDAY to release her outrageous claim that Kavanaugh was somehow a ring leader for a HS gang-rape circuit. Her claims were so incredulous and unsupported that the NYT again passed on writing an article about this.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!