Senate Judiciary Profile picture
Oct 5, 2018 51 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Judge Kavanaugh has spent 25 years of his career in public service. #ConfirmKavanaugh #SCOTUS
He spent the last twelve years on the D.C. Circuit, considered the second-most important federal court in the country.
His record there has been extremely impressive: the Supreme Court adopted a position advanced in Judge Kavanaugh’s opinions no fewer than a dozen times.
Judge Kavanaugh is also a pillar of his community and the legal profession. He serves underprivileged communities, coaches girls’ basketball, and is a lector at his church. He has shown a deep commitment to preparing young lawyers for their careers.
He has been a law professor at three prestigious law schools and a mentor to dozens of judicial law clerks.
This should’ve been a respectable and dignified confirmation process. In a previous era, this highly qualified nominee would’ve received unanimous support in the Senate.
Before left-wing outside groups and Democratic leaders had him in their sights, Judge Kavanaugh possessed an impeccable reputation and was held in high esteem by the bench and bar alike.
Even the American Bar Association, which the Democrats say is the “gold standard”, gave them their unanimously well-qualified rating.
What left-wing groups and their Democratic allies have done to Judge Kavanaugh is nothing short of monstrous.
The conduct of the left-wing, dark money groups and their allies in this body have shamed us all.
The fix was in from the beginning. Before the ink was dry on the nomination, the Minority Leader announced that he would oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything he’s got.
Even before he knew the President’s nominee, the Minority Leader said he was opposed to all twenty-five well qualified potential nominees listed.
One member of my Committee said that those who vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh would be “complicit in evil.”
Another member of the Committee revealed the endgame when she suggested that Senate Democrats could hold the vacancy open for two years if they defeated Judge Kavanaugh and took control of the Senate in the midterm elections.
I oversaw the most transparent confirmation process in Senate history. Senators had access to more than 500,000 pages of judicial writings, publications, and documents from Judge Kavanaugh’s Executive Branch service.
This is on top of the 307 judicial opinions he authored. Despite Democrats’ efforts to bury the Committee in even more paperwork, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a timely four-day hearing on Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination last month.
Judge Kavanaugh testified for more than 32 hours over the course of three days. Judge Kavanaugh showed the nation exactly why he deserves to be on the Supreme Court.
Judge Kavanaugh’s antagonizers couldn’t land a punch on him during his three days of testimony. Even when they made false or misleading arguments, they couldn’t touch him.
Some of my colleagues accused Judge Kavanaugh of committing perjury. For that false claim The Washington Post fact-checker awarded my colleague three Pinocchios.
In July, the Ranking Member received a letter from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford alleging that Judge Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school 36 years ago.
Instead of referring Dr. Ford to the FBI or sharing these allegations with her colleagues—either of which would’ve respected and preserved Dr. Ford’s confidentiality as she requested—the Ranking Member referred Dr. Ford to Democratic-activist attorneys...
The Ranking Member shamefully sat on these allegations for nearly seven weeks, only to reveal them at the eleventh hour when it appeared Judge Kavanaugh was headed towards confirmation.
The Ranking Member had numerous opportunities to raise these allegations with Judge Kavanaugh personally.
She could’ve discussed them with Judge Kavanaugh during their private meeting on August 20—a meeting which took place after her staff had sent Dr. Ford to Democratic lawyers—or shared them with 64 of her colleagues who also met with him.
The Ranking Member’s staff could’ve raised them with Judge Kavanaugh during a background investigation follow-up call in late August.
Senators could’ve asked Judge Kavanaugh about the allegations during his 32 hours of testimony over the course of three days.
Judiciary Committee members could’ve asked Judge Kavanaugh about this in the closed session of the hearing, which the Ranking Member didn’t attend.
And there were no questions about these allegations among the 1,300 written questions sent to Judge Kavanaugh after the hearing. This amounts to more written questions submitted after a hearing to all Supreme Court nominees combined.
Keeping the July 30 letter secret deprived senators of having all the facts before them on this nomination.
It wasn’t until September 13—nearly seven weeks after the Ranking Member received these allegations and on the eve of a confirmation vote—that the Ranking Member referred them to the FBI. And somehow, they were leaked to the press.
It wasn’t until those news reports on September 16 that I learned of Dr. Ford’s identity. This was an outrage. The political motives behind the Democrats’ actions are obvious to everyone.
Dr. Ford requested the opportunity to tell her story to the Senate Judiciary Committee. After a lot of foot-dragging by Dr. Ford’s attorneys, they finally agreed to a public hearing.
As promised, I provided a safe, comfortable, and dignified forum for Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford was sincere in her testimony, as was Judge Kavanaugh, who emphatically denied the allegations.
It’s true that confirmation hearings aren’t a trial. But trials have rules based on common-sense notions of fairness and due process, not the other way around.
It’s a fundamental aspect of fairness and due process that the accuser have the burden of proving allegations. Judge Kavanaugh was publicly accused of a crime, and his reputation and livelihood were at stake. It was only fair that his accuser had the burden of proof.
The consensus is that this burden wasn’t met.
We have thoroughly investigated Judge Kavanaugh’s background.
In addition to the prior 6 FBI full-field background investigations with the interviews of nearly 150 people who have known Judge Kavanaugh his entire life, the Committee also separately and thoroughly investigated every credible allegation that we received.
Our more than 20 committee staff members have worked night and day over the last many weeks, tracking down virtually all leads. And at the request of undecided members, the FBI re-opened Judge Kavanaugh’s background investigation for another week.
The FBI interviewed 10 more people related to the latest credible sexual-assault allegations. And the FBI confirmed what the Senate investigators already concluded.
There’s nothing in the supplemental FBI background-investigation report that we didn’t already know.
These uncorroborated accusations have been unequivocally and repeatedly rejected by Judge Kavanaugh, and neither the Judiciary Committee nor the FBI could locate any third parties who can attest to any of the allegations.
There’s also no contemporaneous evidence. This investigation found no hint of misconduct and the same is true of the six prior FBI background investigations conducted during Judge Kavanaugh’s 25 years of public service.
Nothing an investigator, including career FBI special agents, does will ever be good enough to satisfy the Democrat leadership in Washington, who staked out opposition to Judge Kavanaugh before he was even nominated.
There is simply no reason to deny Judge Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court on the basis of the evidence presented to us.
The Democrat strategy used against Judge Kavanaugh has made one thing clear, they will never be satisfied no matter how fair and thorough this process is.
Thirty-one years after the Senate Democrats’ treatment of Robert Bork, their playbook remains the same. For the left-wing, advice and consent has become search and destroy.
I’m pleased to support Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
I’m sorry for what the Kavanaugh family went through the last several weeks. We should all admire Judge Kavanaugh’s willingness to serve his country despite the way he’s been treated.
It would be a travesty if the Senate did not confirm the most qualified nominee in our nation’s history.
The multitude of allegations against him have been proven false. I urge my colleagues to join me in voting for this exceptional nominee.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Senate Judiciary

Senate Judiciary Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @senjudiciary

Oct 4, 2018
.@ChuckGrassley: “I’ve now received a committee staff briefing on the FBI’s supplement to Judge Kavanaugh’s background investigation file. There’s nothing in it that we didn’t already hint of misconduct...It’s time to vote. I’ll be voting to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.”
“I trust that the career agents of the FBI have done their work independent of political or partisan considerations. That’s exactly what senators from both sides asked for. Now it’s up to senators to fulfill their constitutional duty and make a judgment.”…
Chairman @ChuckGrassley: "A presumption of innocence is how the American justice system works, and it should remain our guidepost in the Senate. Abandoning that principle would cut a sad path for the Senate as an institution."
Read 4 tweets
Oct 2, 2018
The texts from Ms. Berchem do not appear relevant or contradictory to Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony. This appears to be another last-ditch effort to derail the nomination with baseless innuendo by Democrats who have already decided to vote no. 1/6
Shortly before Friday’s committee meeting began, Senator Blumenthal’s office forwarded ten emails to the Chairman’s office originally from Ms. Berchem. They were immediately passed to Chairman Grassley’s oversight and investigations team for review. 2/6
Committee investigators advised Senator Blumenthal’s staff that they could contact the FBI to pass along that information if they thought it was necessary. Whether Senator Blumenthal’s staff chose to do that was up to them. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Sep 28, 2018
Senate Democrats keep calling for an FBI investigation, but they fail to mention that the FBI’s role is not to reach conclusions in these cases. 1/6
Dr. Ford’s allegations WERE submitted to the FBI on Sept. 13 by RM Feinstein MORE THAN SIX WEEKS after she received them. The FBI then added them to Judge Kavanaugh’s file for the @SenJudiciary to review. The FBI then closed the case. 2/6
The Justice Department has explained that the FBI’s role in background investigations is to evaluate any national security risks and present information for decision makers, not to judge the credibility of accusations. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Sep 20, 2018
Within hours of learning Dr. Ford’s identity from press reports on Sunday Chairman Grassley took swift action making contact w the alleged witnesses. Dems haven’t joined background investigation of Dr. Ford’s allegations. It's our constitutional duty to do investigations. Join us
Democrats sat on Dr. Ford’s allegations for MONTHS & did nothing. They STILL haven’t turned over the original letter they received from Dr. Ford. Why would Dems sit on allegations for months and then not even participate in the Committee’s investigation?…
On Monday, staff interviewed Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony. Democratic staff was invited and could have asked any question of Judge Kavanaugh. They declined to participate.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!