A little explanation of an @FBI background investigation: The person under investigation is usually going to be having extensive access to very sensitive and possibly classified information. The MSM is playing it like the background investigation is a minor thing. It’s not.
It is a thorough investigation that goes back a few decades. In light of the recent issues with the Bu, I doubt Wray would let anyone dictate what amount of time was sufficient. The time was most likely discussed before it was announced.
I know if it was my squad, as an FBI SSA, I would have already been pulling the files and reviewed them for how thoroughly they were done and had any questions been ignored or not followed to a logical conclusion.
You see, the FBI is not sitting there just waiting to be told to take a look at their investigation and determine how long they needed to do the supplemental investigation. They were most likely already on it.
We rarely sat around waiting for anyone to tell us to commence an investigation. Doesn’t work that way. Hope this helps clarify. Just wanted to share experience from an actual former FBI SSA who was also the victim of gender discrimination & retaliation. Hence: 
The letter “sat around” in Feinstein’s possession for quite a while & was pulled out only at a time she decided to insert it strategically into the whole process. For her to hold the letter & produce it at a later time was unacceptable & deserves to be investigated.
If anyone screwed this up it was Feinstein. If anyone used sexual assault as a political weapon it was Feinstein.
Enough is enough! The crap being pulled for political reasons, with absolutely no regard for this country needs to stop. On both sides. #ReinstateRobynGritz
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
