Given the spin in the media and by leftist Hollywood/celebs + skewed (or fabricated) polls , it can sometimes be hard to know where the public stands on an issue. People tend to live in their "bubble" and get affirmed w/in their own echo chamber.
2/
While this is not a scientific method, I thought I would analyze data available on Twitter, which is open to all people but is known to skew things to the left, to see what the numbers tell us about support for or opposition to #JudgeKavanaugh.
3/
My method was simple. To avoid being "served" input from within my bubble, I did this analysis anonymously while logged out of Twitter. I pulled the 15 top results served by Twitter on a search of "Kavanaugh" and compiled these results, which are VERY interesting.
4/
The 15 random results included some major news organizations and Twitter personalities. Of the 15 results, the postings could be classified as 9 in support of Kavanaugh and 6 showing opposition (60% favorable).
5/
Looking at follower counts and weighting them, I found that the 9 supportive posts came from Twitter accounts w/ 45.2M followers. The 6 anti-Kavanaugh posts came from Twitter accounts w/ 33.7M followers. So weighted splits (based on followers) were 57% favorable, 43% against.
6/
It gets VERY interesting when looking at engagement and comments. This gives a measure of where the "people" stand on the issue and the degree of energy and passion. Retweets, likes, and comments were HUGELY in favor of #Kavanaugh. The results were staggering actually.
7/
- 97% of all retweets (11,603 of 12,009) were for the Pro-Kavanaugh tweets
- 97% of all likes (31,094 of 32,115) were for the Pro-Kavanaugh tweets
- 54% of the top COMMENTS (76 of 141) were pro Kavanaugh
8/
- Comment engagement (that is, the tally of retweets + likes) for the 141 top comments was 87% pro Kavanaugh. That is, adding the retweets + likes of the top comments showed 3,459 of 3,997 RT/likes of comments were for favorable comments to Kavanaugh.
9/
#TRUTH
In summary:
- 60% of random tweets re: #Kavanaugh supported him, w/57% of implied "audience" supporting Kavanaugh (using follower count as a proxy)
- 97% of all retweets and likes were supportive of Kavanaugh
- 87% of the engagement in comments support Kavanaugh
END/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wanted to post this update to give a quick interpretation to #Q's latest posts this evening.
In 2017, Q had posted about "The Hunt for Red October."
2/ Those who have read Tom Clancy know this is a reference to the great novel about a cat-and-mouse game involving a Russian nuclear sub that is looking to defect to the US.
So what did Q mean in this and the many other references to Red October?
3/ When the phrase included "The Hunt for"...Q was giving a clue that it was a reference to a rogue nuclear sub, likely the one that went missing from North Korea in 2017. It was being controlled by the #DeepState.
Recall the "false" [not false] Hawaiian Jan 2018 missile alert.
#Q's posts are monitored by both #Patriots & the #DeepState, so Q cannot telegraph every move. However, there's seems to be a clock in place, w/post numbers essentially acting as a countdown to 2400...midnight for the #cabal...w/a planned #RedOctober take down.
#RedOctober has clearly referenced a timeline where the coordinated arrests will occur this month, prior to the 2018 election.
"Red October" was first referenced on 11/20/17 as "The Hunt for Red October."
"Red October" has appeared 20 times in #Q's posts.
The reference to "The Hunt for Red October" was thought to have many meanings:
- Dealing w/a rogue nuclear sub (think Hawaii)
- Cyberespionage malware
- The plan culmination in the plan in October 2018 (#RedOctober)
There are many inconsistencies, or even outright lies, when it comes to the "story" outlined by #ChristineBlaseyFord. Here are a few:
# people at party
# timing/year of party
# location of party
# never mentioned Kavanaugh by name until July 2018
# layout of party
# your self-identified "witnesses" all refute that they attended any such party
# your long-time friend #LelandKeyser further states she has never met #JudgeKavanaugh
# you never mentioned this assault to anyone prior to 2012 therapy session...including during long-term relationship
# you claimed the revelation of abuse came from a therapy session in 2012 w/your husband, prompted by an argument over wanting 2 front doors to your home...
Happy Anniversary to #TheStorm! One year ago today, #POTUS announced to a confused press corps: “This is the calm before the storm!“
2/
Those who have done their own research, or who are lucky enough to have discovered #QAnon, know what was meant by the reference to “The Storm.” It is now upon us, and the Deep State is in full panic mode.
3/
Many months ago, some smart anons who are very good at seeing patterns discovered that #Q”s posts seem to relate to a clock dial in terms of timing. The dates of posts and the post numbers sometimes contain their own meaning.
2/ Anyone who supports #JudgeKavanaugh should not be concerned w/a one week investigation as long as:
- #POTUS has control over the rogue #FBI.
- #RuleofLaw is restored.
3/ The #WhiteHats are now in contol...including of the #FBI. Witness the ouster and/or referral for prosecution of #Comey, #McCabe, #Strzok, #Page, #JamesBaker, et al (T makes it hard to ID ALL of the traitors).
Quick analysis of smear campaign against #JudgeKavanaugh: 1. #Ford's accusation is LITTERED w/contradictions and lacks a SINGLE PIECE of corroboration. See:
2. #DeborahRamirez' claims were so unsubstantiated, w/o credibility or corroboration, that the #NYT REFUSED to publish an article about them. Ramirez admitted she only recalled that "Kavanaugh had exposed himself" after SIX DAYS of consulting her attorney. theamericanconservative.com/dreher/six-day…
3. Accuser # 3, #JulieSwetnick, incredibly waited until YESTERDAY to release her outrageous claim that Kavanaugh was somehow a ring leader for a HS gang-rape circuit. Her claims were so incredulous and unsupported that the NYT again passed on writing an article about this.