While I kick my heels for a meeting, let's think about Brexit and inevitability:
1/
Let's start off by noting that I'm not a big one for inevitability, in any political situation
2/
It's a throwing up of the hands and submitting to forces beyond our control: 'there's nothing to be done'
Personally, I think there's always something to be done
3/
Of course, not accepting inevitability isn't the same as saying some things aren't very likely indeed, which'll feel like a semantic point, but it's still an important one
4/
Any way, from the general to the particular
5/
Inevitability has reared its head several times in the Brexit debate
6/
There's a whole debate about whether it was inevitable that the UK would vote to leave in #EURef: island history, the fundamental rightness of nation-states, stuff like that
7/
Since #EUref, there's been another debate about whether Brexit is inevitable, ie that the UK must now leave given the vote.
8/
This suits those who want leave, appealing to democratic norms and to the previous inevitability debate
9/
However, it's also much more challenged, by those who wish to remain in the EU, again appealing to democratic mechanisms for accommodating changes of mind
10/
What's interesting in this is the extent to which the frame of inevitability can be made to stick in public discourse
11/
The political advantage of owning a narrative of inevitability is that it actively disempowers your opponents: we're all just being swept along by the tide of history and there's nothing to be done
12/
If one can construct this as the predominant frame, then it becomes very hard to overturn
13/
Broadly speaking, you either have to appeal to some fundamental value or something seemingly trivial
14/
Eurosceptics took the former route in the 2000s when they reframed the inevitability of EU membership by appealing to 'giving the people a vote'
15/
anti-communists in the 1980s took the latter one by using the pursuit of environmental protests as a path to more systemic critiques
16/
Again, not all such efforts are successful, and often beyond on things changing in the wider context too, but equally they aren't all failures
17/
Not sure there's any great point to this, but worth reflecting on next time someone says something's inevitable
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Possibly more for me than for you, let's try to pull this week together a bit:
1/
Let's start with the EU side
Having largely kept heads down during conference season, yesterday's Tusk/Varadkar presser demonstrated that EU is keeping the pressure on
2/
The tension seems to be between COM/EUCO and IE, as @pmdfoster explained well yesterday: IE making conciliatory noises, central EU bodies pushing EU integrity line
Back in Sept, there was much talk about this being a crunch point in the UK debate, as May would come under fire for Chequers and there would be scope for changes/realignments/whatever
2/
Certainly that first bit has happened, with numerous op-eds over the weekend and assorted fringe events (inc. yesterday's Johnson speech)
3/
@politicshome Essentially, we're back in "Australian points-based system" territory
Don't sweat the details, but trust my plan with the Anglo-friendly name and show some bulldog spirit
@politicshome As a challenge to May, it's got legs (because it's Johnson and because he can articulate much of the unhappiness others feel towards her)