Jeff Yang 🫶 Profile picture
Oct 8, 2017 21 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1. No one‘s saying it but while #BladeRunner2049 is beautiful, interesting & richly realized, the reasons it is failing are abundantly clear
2. First, it’s hugely self-indulgent. As an iconic white male director, Ridley Scott‘s convinced his work is CANONICAL for today’s audiences
3. Which means he condescendingly doesn’t bother to explain, scene-set or contextualize ANYTHING for new eyeballs. “GO WATCH THE ORIGINAL”
4. This is how he constructed Prometheus/Alien: Covenant too, eg “You’ve done your homework on your own time, or why are you even watching?”
5. Secondly: Scott doesnt just dismiss the contextual needs of new viewers—he also refuses to cast his films to give them narrative purchase
6. Main protagonists/antagonists of Prometheus, Alien: Covenant, #BladeRunner2049? White. Arctic white. Glacially white.
7. Yes, actors of color Idris Elba, Jussie Smollett, Benedict Wong, Dave Bautista, Lennie James, Barkhad Abdi, Carmen Ejogo get small roles.
8. But the leads, the poster faces, the POV and nemesis roles always go to white actors in Scott’s films.
9. And before you say it, he can cast the leads he wants. *But it makes his futures feel false and hollow—as seen through a narrow tube.*
10. It’s PARTICULARLY awkward in the Blade Runner universe, which is deeply inflected with pomo Japanese accents in its social vision/design
11. (Though 2049 interestingly reins that in from the original and replaces some of it with North Korean and Soviet Russian iconography.)
12. But there’s still the lingering flavor of Asian Future, Hold the Asians that we’ve seen in other SF visions (like ScarJo’s GitS).
13. This is all par for the course for Scott. I mean....Exodus.

newsweek.com/ridley-scott-r…
14. And of course #TheMartian (a hit with diverse actors in some key roles, but could’ve had more based on the book) variety.com/2015/film/news…
15. (Yes BR2049 was directed by Denis Villeneuve, but keeper of the Ultimate Vision was Scott, who hand-picked him. wired.co.uk/article/blade-…)
16. (And Villeneuve was undoubtedly responsible for the aesthetic updates, but no way the film was cast without Scott picking every actor.)
17. Bottom line—would BR 2049 have been more successful if it had a more diverse topline cast? No one knows.
18. But diverse casting would’ve made #BladeRunner2049 resonant with a host of current issues: Undocumented immigration. Police brutality.
19. Not to mention historical issues that are being resurrected today: Slavery, obviously, and slave rebellion. But also miscegenation laws.
20. Did Scott & his protege overlook these opportunities to make #BR2049 instantly pertinent? Or did they decide they were too on the nose?
21. Who knows? All I can say is that I mourn for the movie that #BladeRunner2049 COULD have been.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Yang 🫶

Jeff Yang 🫶 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @originalspin

Oct 1, 2018
When we say “women,” please clarify that this means *straight cis white women*.

Gay/trans women / women of color have smelled the GOP mess for decades and they’ve voted in suit. If it’s somehow new to straight cis white women, that’s part of the problem.

newsweek.com/republicans-ju…
White women have voted essentially 50-50 Republican/Democrat in presidential races since 1952. Only the 1964 Johnson/Goldwater race is a substantial outlier. 52% voted for Trump in 2016—against an outrageously qualified white woman. That’s just in line with long term trends.
To think this event or even this presidency means “Republicans have lost women” is bad analysis; the truth is that they have never lost straight cis white women, and they have never won gay/trans women and women of color.

“Winning women” means getting more of the latter to vote.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 18, 2018
#CrazyRichAsians is headed for a monster opening, and it’s essential to look at why. A full 38% of viewers so far have been Asian—we’re COMING OUT for this film as we never have in cinematic history.

But another 24% of viewers are black or Hispanic: *viewers are 62% nonwhite*.
The book #CrazyRichAsians was based on was a NYT bestseller. When the target for the book is described by folks in publishing, they say “white female, summer read, book club, 35-54.” That audience isn’t who’s filling theaters—yet.

They’re the ones who might take this to $100M.
If you haven’t seen it yet, a small spoiler. After the first 15 minutes of #CrazyRichAsians, you will not see another nonwhite person on screen. Not even in background shots. And the only white people with speaking roles get played like dominoes. In the first five minutes.
Read 22 tweets
Dec 13, 2017
Twitter fam: Please share with me your fave black woman candidates. I’m going to try to give to all of them. I hope you do too.

When we see Jones beat Moore because *97% of black women* brave all-day lines to vote for him, we’re looking at the future of the Democratic Party.
Okay let’s get this GOING! Connie Johnson, DONATED. Join me, folks!

#GiveBackGiveBlack
Stacey Abrams, DONATED.
staceyabrams.com

#GiveBackGiveBlack
Read 24 tweets
Oct 12, 2017
Puerto Rico is home to 3.5m AMERICANS—90% of whom have no electricity, clean water or secure food! It’s the size of Connecticut, but brown!
Any human with a soul can see this is poised to become a humanitarian disaster of epic proportions due to your lack of empathy & leadership
If basic services aren’t restored, starvation and disease will set in. We could have a cholera outbreak IN THE US, the first since 1910!
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(