Mark S. Zaid Profile picture
Oct 27, 2017 29 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
(1) THREAD: #JFKFiles #Assassination UPDATE - What happened that allowed 300 documents comprising thousands of pages to be held back? Legal?
(2) JFK Assassination Records Collection Act required every record identified as "assassination record" (which I helped define in 1994) ...
(3) SHALL be publicly disclosed in full after 25 years (Oct 26, 2017), unless President affirmatively certifies:
(4) continued postponement is necessary by IDENTIFIABLE harm to mil defense, intel ops, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations;
(5) AND the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure. A very HIGH standard to be sure.
(6) So, what the heck happened yesterday with this mad scramble? Especially since this day has been known for years in advance.
(7) Many of us started advocating YEARS ago to ensure yesterday would go smoothly. Here is 2012 letter we sent: jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2012/06/nation…
(8) One problem was law was not clear or precise enough as to how yesterday would happen. Lawyers could interpret strictly so that ....
(9) agencies had until 11:59.59 EDT to continue to argue against release. No process was set up on how this would work. NARA was standing by
(10) No releases could be made by @USNatArchives until it absolutely knew no presidential certification would be made through end of day.
(11) That gave agencies ability to continue to make last minute arguments to persuade @realDonaldTrump not to release specific records
(12) So notwithstanding @realDonaldTrump tweets that seemed to imply he would allow ALL records to be released, it wasn't true
(13) Now if @POTUS hadn't acted to certify, then ALL records would have to be disclosed in FULL by end of day. Instead, he balked.
(14) NEW INFO - My sources tell me in weeks prior those in NSC had RECOMMENDED full release but something changed. What?
(15) I am told Mike Barry, who replaced Ezra Cohen-Watnick at NSC, & is connected to CIA carried agency water thehill.com/homenews/admin…
(16) FBI and CIA continued to advocate yesterday throughout the day that info had to be withheld. Did they meet the required legal standard?
(17) After having reviewed many of the released files, no surprise that the 300 docs withheld are more important and crucial
(18) Now that doesn't mean new docs will solve assassination. Get real. But they are historically important for sure.
(19) What does 180 day delay mean? Are agencies in violation of law? Can we do anything about this farce?
(20) If agencies had refused to release records w/o presidential certification then they would have been in violation of #JFK statute.
(21) But President stepped in & basically amended law. No 180 day provision. Yesterday was THE day per law. He assumed responsibility
(22) Theoretically I suppose CIA/FBI not in violation. Instead, constitutional battle over separation of powers could exist by Pres action
(23) Individual members of Congress, like @RepWalterJones & @ChuckGrassley, have complained but Congress won't realistically act as a body
(24) Unfortunately public powerless. We litigated JFK Act in 1990s/2000s & federal courts refused to allow us to enforce. No private right.
(25) I should note @realDonaldTrump comment that he had no choice is absolutely absurd. He again shows he doesn't understand his own power
(26) President is top of food chain. He has full declassification authority. What he says goes. He CHOSE to grant 180 delay. SMH
(27) His action violates spirit, and arguably letter, of the law. Goes against everything he led us to believe he would do.
(28) So now we wait up to 180 days (or more, who knows) to see whether law will be enforced. Public & Congressional pressure must continue
(FINAL)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark S. Zaid

Mark S. Zaid Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkSZaidEsq

Jul 13, 2018
@TheJusticeDept indicts against Russian intel officers for DNC hack. Says GRU officers hacked info & released info "on the internet under the names 'DCLeaks' and 'Guccifer 2.0' and through another entity."

Would that other entity be you @wikileaks? 🤔

justice.gov/opa/pr/grand-j…
And if it is Wikileaks, why not finally publicly name them?
Read 4 tweets
Jul 6, 2018
(1) THREAD on #SecurityClearances & #WhiteSupremacists. @PBS/@ProPublica issued a story today abt #MichaelMiselis — a UCLA PhD student who works for #NorthropGrumman w/security clearance. He participated in Charlottesville as a violent White Supremacist.

pbs.org/wgbh/frontline…
(2) Miselis allegedly "pushed an African-American protester to the ground and began pounding on him," and "fought alongside RAM members, wrestling one protester to the ground and punching others" in Berkeley at a #Trump rally.
(3) RAM is Rise Above Movement, a Southern California group that expresses contempt for Muslims, Jews, and immigrants. A very typical #Trump supporting organization that President has never condemned. Pretty horrible group of Nazis basially. For info, read adl.org/resources/back…
Read 11 tweets
Feb 14, 2018
(1) THREAD: #RobPorter , #SecurityClearances & SERIOUS #Trump #WhiteHouse PROBLEMS

When did the White House know of the serious domestic abuse concerns regarding Rob Porter, the now fallen White House Staff Secretary?
(2) This question is crucial to determining whether those in the White House deliberately ignored security warnings and instead politically decided to retain Porter.
(3) As I told @JudyWoodruff on @NewsHour tonight there were at least 3-4 opportunities where WH had enough info to realize there were serious problems w/Porter obtaining a clearance and they could have, and perhaps should have, taken action. pbs.org/newshour/show/….
Read 56 tweets
Jan 30, 2018
THREAD - What does #HPSCI release of GOP classified memo mean?

In a partisan vote led by Chairman @DevinNunes, the HPSI voted to release a four page classified memo that details alleged surveillance abuses by @FBI & @TheJusticeDept.

washingtonpost.com/world/national…
HPSCI, which along with Senate counterpart (#SSCI), was formed 40 years ago in wake of #ChurchCommittee, #PikeCommittee& #RockefellerCommission, which dealt with a variety of abuses by the Intelligence Community, acted in an unprecedented manner by invoking Rule X, clause 11(f)
(3) That provision actually talks abt preventing disclosure, without consent of each person concerned, of info in possession of HPSCI "that unduly infringes
on the privacy or that violates the constitutional rights of such person."
Read 23 tweets
Nov 23, 2017
(1) REVENGE PORN THREAD: Earlier today Texas Tribune posted a story concerning Rep. Joe Barton (R-Ennis) that he issued an apology statement after it was learned a graphic image of him nude (apparently showing his penis), was circulating via social media. texastribune.org/2017/11/22/us-…
(2) Was this revenge porn? Should there not be an outcry or does Barton being a man negate outrage? I take these situations very seriously, especially since I have represented women (pro bono in fact) who have suffered as victims of revenge porn, nbc-2.com/story/34185598…
(3) In my opinion, I don’t believe there should be a double standard based on gender. Were the gender roles reversed, I daresay, especially in the current climate, all hell would be breaking loose. So let’s take a moment to examine the legal issues in this case thus far.
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(