1. THREAD re: Voting Machine Vendor Due Diligence.
2. States planning 2 use ANY sort of voting machines owe the public a DUTY 2 confirm in writing that no CONVICTED FELONS r owners, officers,
3.... employees, contractors, consultants, etc. of the voting machine vendor.
4. NO ONE ELSE IS CONDUCTING THIS BASIC DUE DILIGENCE ABOUT WHO HAS ACCESS TO OUR VOTING MACHINES.
5. Diebold/Premier (30% US voting equipment) was founded by three criminals. freepress.org/article/felons…
6. Voting machine giant Diebold/Premier (previously called "Global") made CONVICTED FELON Dean a Sr. VP in 2000. people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/voting/…
7. Dean was no ordinary criminal. His crimes involved COMPUTER tampering. wired.com/2003/12/con-jo…
8. The crimes 4 which Dean was convicted (b4 joining Diebold) involved a "HIGH DEGREE OF SOPHISTICATION & PLANNING" wired.com/2003/12/con-jo…
9. According to Wired, CONVICTED FELON Dean "wrote & maintained...code used to count hundreds of thousands of votes" wired.com/2003/12/con-jo…
10. CONVICTED FELON Dean programmed the GEMS central tabulator system, which counted 1/3 votes in 37 states in 04 theguardian.com/politics/2005/…
11. Soon after hiring Dean, Global hired a convicted drug trafficker to oversee punch card printing people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/voting/… … …
12. Punch cards. can be rigged, by selectively die-cutting so that some chads dislodge more easily than others. scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0312…
13. Here's an excerpt from the CRIMINAL SENTENCING DOCUMENT for J. Dean who did the VOTING MACHINE PROGRAMMING discussed above.
14. Here's an SEC filing showing that CONVICTED FELON Dean was the majority shareholder of Global in 01 (which Diebold acquired in 02).
15. It would be nice if the mainstream media had discovered & reported this information about the CRIMINALS at Diebold. But it did not.
16. This info was discovered & reported only due to the investigative efforts of election integrity advocate @BevHarrisWrites.
17. With just a few exceptions (e.g., Wired, Vanity Fair, & Harpers), the MSM has ignored the #DieboldFelons even after learning about them!
18. Diebold told the AP that convicted felon Dean left the company when it acquired Global in 2002. blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-14… … …
19. The MSM conducted no follow up. Even @paulkrugman took Diebold at its word that Dean left after the acquisition. nytimes.com/2004/01/23/opi…
20.But @BevHarrisWrites obtained Dean's court file, which included internal Diebold memos showing that Dean remained as a Diebold CONSULTANT
21. Here is the link to post 20 re: CONVICTED FELON Dean's consulting relationship w/ Diebold Election Systems. blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-14…
22. After learning of Dean's criminal record & relationship w/ Diebold, GA's Election Board & AG DID NOTHING. voterga.org/category/uncat…
23. Reporters like @miwines of the NYT consider such criminal affiliations INAPPROPRIATE subjects for "journalism."
24. We have all heard the phrase "Democracy dies in darkness." Where is the sunlight in this situation?
25. Because the media and election officials have declined to follow up on Dean, we can only speculate when (if at all) he left the company.
26. If our democracy is to survive, we must wake up NOW to the reality that our mainstream media & elected officials will NOT voluntarily...
27. vet the people with direct access to our voting machines. Thus, we must find a way to SHAME or otherwise COMPEL them to do this vetting.
28. If we cannot trust our media and elected officials to let us know when actual criminals have direct access to our votes, then I do not..
29. ... see how we can in good conscience continue to use voting machines at all.
30.
31. Dominion bought Diebold/Premier in 2010. Note the name of the Dominion spokesperson in this article. news.abs-cbn.com/nation/05/07/1…
32. P.S. Robert Urosevich, who was president of Global (Diebold/Premier precursor) when FELONS Dean & Elder were brought on board, ...
33. ..founded ES&S (previously called AIS/DataMark) w/ his brother. Thus, ES&S is related to Diebold of the felons. verifiedvoting.org/resources/voti…
34. Another source for post 33. omaha.com/columnists/kel…
35. As of 2010, Diebold and ES&S accounted for 70% of US voting equipment. justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…
36. ALL voting machine vendors & contracts should be publicly vetted. This is just basic due diligence. This is simple common sense.
37. People like @BevHarrisWrites should not have to do this vetting for our media and elected officials.
38. I shouldn't have to do Twitter exposes about the FELONS at DIEBOLD, hoping against hope that someone like @miwine or @iamsambee or @maddow or @JasonKander will find their way to my Twitter feed and want to help out.
39. I feel like I'm SCREAMING IN THE DARK. This is INSANITY. This must CHANGE. We need #TransparentElections.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢

jennycohn@toad.social ✍🏻 📢 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jennycohn1

Jan 13, 2019
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
Read 6 tweets
Oct 9, 2018
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
Read 11 tweets
Oct 9, 2018
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
Read 8 tweets
Oct 8, 2018
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark @SEGreenhalgh @rad_atl @jhalderm
P. 79 describes the modem elections.wi.gov/sites/default/…
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that. 1/
Read 4 tweets
Oct 8, 2018
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
Here’s the letter. drive.google.com/file/d/1-Fd8a8… 2/
Read 16 tweets
Oct 8, 2018
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(