So, a quick round-up of the main points to note from this morning's #A50 agreement:
1/
It's only a rpt (from COM and HMG) to #EUCO, so still have to sign off on it next week, so not definitive yet
2/
Even if we assume #EUCO does sign off, the detail isn't locked in until end of #A50 negotiations and ratification, so nothing is legally banked
3/
However, this does mark out path that will be followed, if only by anchoring all future debate, so it does matter
4/
On all three issues, UK has moved very much more than EU on substance
5/
For finances, UK effectively member of budget arrangements to end of current financial cycle in 2020, while also winding down commitments in EIB etc
6/
For citizens' rights, largely takes EU line on protection of rights, w transitional role for CJEU, but several gaps on FoM still to address
7/
For IE border, commitment to protect open border by 'full alignment' to SM/CU in relevant areas, unless alternative arrangements
8/
This last suggests UK will shadow SM/CU in large part unless and until new models can be found. Allows UK to say it has own regs, EU to say there is no divergence
9/
However, big caveat is that most of text is about agreeing need to agree, not actual agreement. Cans have been kicked down road
10/
This means Phase 1 issues will still be live topics in coming year, alongside a much more complex Phase 2
11/
In short, it's progress, but not yet enough to ensure a final deal next year
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Possibly more for me than for you, let's try to pull this week together a bit:
1/
Let's start with the EU side
Having largely kept heads down during conference season, yesterday's Tusk/Varadkar presser demonstrated that EU is keeping the pressure on
2/
The tension seems to be between COM/EUCO and IE, as @pmdfoster explained well yesterday: IE making conciliatory noises, central EU bodies pushing EU integrity line
Back in Sept, there was much talk about this being a crunch point in the UK debate, as May would come under fire for Chequers and there would be scope for changes/realignments/whatever
2/
Certainly that first bit has happened, with numerous op-eds over the weekend and assorted fringe events (inc. yesterday's Johnson speech)
3/