Qizardicous Profile picture
Feb 12, 2018 22 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/ Russian bots have no First Amendment protections and should be outlawed. ‘Bot speech’ was and is being used to undermine our democracy. For eg, on Election Day, Twitter bots sent out the hashtag #WarAgainstDemocrats more than 1,700 times.
2/ AI expert Matt Chessen points to the ways that machine learning enhances computational propaganda, providing “radically enhanced capabilities to manipulate human minds.” atlanticcouncil.org/publications/r…
3/ Bots’ ability to spread through social media by using algorithms to replicate bots and repeat bot speech, results in insidious artificial amplification of false confirmation bias. See, eg: cjr.org/analysis/breit…
4/ Bot speech radicalizes factually inaccurate beliefs. Studies have found that people are more apt to persist in their beliefs, despite contradictory evidence, once they've written their beliefs down, a phenomenon known as the “explanation effect”. sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/…
5/ **CODE (bot language) IS NOT (legally) SPEECH** The Supreme Court has never accepted that code is protected like speech. The notion that Code = Speech is dangerous and must be rejected. technologyreview.com/s/600916/apple…
6/ Courts rejected Apple’s argument that writing breakable encryption would be “compelled speech” in the First Amendment sense. documentcloud.org/documents/2722…
7/ Bots aren't human. Police need not read bots Miranda rights and nor can bots be arrested or sent to prison. Bots have no “human rights”. Human operators behind the bots may have rights, but bots do not. en.protothema.gr/what-are-inter…
8/ Code is created by humans, *BUT* code can also be programmed to self-perpetuate--self-perpetuating code is not human expression. thedailybeast.com/why-do-robots-…
9/ Bots are virtual speech echos. Undermining US democracy is nefarious enough to earn strict scrutiny for 1A litmus. Contextually within social media, where bots were weaponized to the detriment of US national security, bot code is NOT SPEECH (human expression) in the 1A sense.
10/ Even human words aren’t always speech under the First Amendment. Speech can be regulated based on time, place and manner restrictions, such as the torts of defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. See, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/t…
11/ Also excluded from 1A protection is speech likely to lead to tangible harm—true threats, fighting words, incitement to imminent lawless action. See, law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/t…
12/ We must combat the virtual war waged by Putin on many fronts. Why is it that so many millions of Americans were so vulnerable to this virtual weapon? According to the Pew Research Center, only 20 percent of Americans trust their government. people-press.org/2017/05/03/pub…
13/ “Instead of “rapid information operations,” the United States should work to systematically rebuild analytical skills across the American population and invest in the media to ensure that it is driven by truth, not clicks.” nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opi…
14/ Of course, Trump beats the Kremlin drum daily, encouraging US citizens to mistrust our democratic institutions. He relies heavily on Kremlin bots and trolls to amplify his Kremlin #ActiveMeasures narrative. money.cnn.com/2018/01/27/tec…
15/ Trump is an indisputable Kremlin conduit. usatoday.com/story/news/wor…
16/ Trump is in a race to obstruct all efforts to inoculate the citizenry against the Kremlin’s insidious exploitation of our vulnerable citizens. One of his first acts was to decapitate public schools. washingtonpost.com/local/educatio…
17/ As a loyalist to the Kremlin, Trump is eviscerating the US Dept of Education. americanprogress.org/issues/educati…
18/ Even conservatives opposed Trump’s moves to neutralize public school education. But, you see—Trump has no ideology, other than to serve his master, Putin. usnews.com/news/education…
19/ So, where does this leave us, besides more vulnerable to hostile foreign powers? We are left with the option that philanthropists of good conscience must step up to save our democracy. qz.com/898530/in-just…
20/ The philanthropy-savior model is not exactly ideal. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
21/ For every Bill Gates, there is a Robert Mercer. theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
22/ Our recourse is found in the ballot box. We must oppose with all of our might, gerrymandering and voter suppression—get out the vote as has never been done in US history. Only then may we inoculate the citizenry against hostile foreign interlopers. huffingtonpost.com/entry/can-we-s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Qizardicous

Qizardicous Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Skip80Cat

Oct 5, 2018
Senator Collins is waning on about interest groups against Kavanaugh but IGNORES dark money interest groups in support of Kavanaugh.
Senator Collins references Kavanaugh’s judicial record. She disagrees w notion he will eliminate ACA protections, pointing to his dissent in Holder. She argues that his views on severability is narrow.
She addresses the concern about Kavanaugh protecting the POTUS. She argues that Kavanaugh defers to legislative authority. She argues Clinton got 2 justices confirmed while under Whitewater investigation and 3 Nixon appointees ruled against Nixon ruled against Nixon.
Read 14 tweets
Sep 28, 2018
1/ Here is what really bothers me about Kavanaugh: he feels he deserves everything he has and will have because he has earned it. This is a uniquely Calvinist-origin ideology. It is also precisely one of the things which **theologically** distinguishes Catholics from Protestants.
2/ The implications are enormous if one considers the reverse scenario: those to whom life has brought hardship are unworthy, lazy, and have not “earned” their way. Protestant-Calvinist thinking is deeply entrenched in American culture, especially at Yale. christianity.com/church/denomin…
3/ If Kavanaugh adhered to Catholic teaching, he would have by this age internalized that it is mandatory we give a preferential option to the poor. He would practice the Corporal Works of Mercy. He would NOT insist that his success is due to his own merit or worth.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 26, 2018
A new article discussing Deripaska, Steele, Waldman, and Assange by @IgnatiusPost requires some serious unpacking. Christopher Steele worked for Deripaska in 2012. (washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-gop…)
Deripaska was interviewed by the FBI in 2015, 2016, and possibly in 2017.
In 2009, while Mueller was FBI Director, the FBI conducted a covert outreach to Deripaska to locate missing CIA contractor Robert Levinson. (I believe this was accomplished through John McCain).
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2018
1/ Let’s look behind impious Catholics and their pink flamingos () and Catholic Kellyann Conway self-righteous-types tub shitters (), and dissect the “Kavanaugh Catholic” — with the caveat I, too am a Catholic.
2/ First, we all witnessed Kavanaugh last night make several public pronouncements, to wit:
“I was a virgin.”
“I was busy studying.”
“I was the Captain of my football team.”
“I have never sexually assaulted anyone, ever.”
3/ Kavanaugh had his wife by his side, who vouched for him throughout. He also claimed to have spent his career as a champion for women and women’s issues. Neither Kavanaugh nor his wife (whom he met after high school) addressed the bevy of mounting evidence against him.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 24, 2018
What this means is that the Kremlin is weighing in. Drudge Report is a Kremlin conduit. This party just got started.
Here's how the Russians targeted Ohio for the 2016 election (using Drudge Report) dispatch.com/news/20180220/…
As of mid-September 2016, Drudge Report had linked to state Russian media 91x in 2016. It's a Putin arm. mediamatters.org/blog/2016/09/1…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 22, 2018
In accordance w the Violence Against Women & Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2013 (“VAWA 2013”), officers and/or investigators may not require victims of sexual assault to submit to a polygraph test or other truth-telling devices.
POLICY AND TRAINING CONTENT GUIDELINES — The Senate Judiciary Committee is doing everything WRONG.
The unwarranted exertion of control by @ChuckGrassley over a putative sexual assault victim violates every single guideline recommendation of the Intl Assoc of Chiefs of Police.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!