THREAD: OK, let’s talk about this again. 1/

nytimes.com/2018/02/19/hea…
There have been many attacks on the #ACA from the GOP over the years, and many of these have undermined, sabotaged and weakened it. Two of the biggest and most damaging attacks were the #RiskCorridorMassacre (spearheaded by @marcorubio) and the mandate repeal. 2/
The #RiskCorridorMassacre led or contributed to a domino effect of over a dozen insurers going belly-up, kicking over 800K off their policies, reducing competition, putting hundreds out of work and causing mass confusion while driving up rates. acasignups.net/16/08/31/retur… 3/
The effects of the mandate repeal last December are already being felt somewhat this year...around 3-4% of the 2018 rate hikes were caused by carriers THINKNG Republicans MIGHT kill the mandate. acasignups.net/17/11/01/and-i… 4/
Of course, there was a THIRD major sabotage attack, also shown in that chart: The ~14% hike caused directly by Trump cutting off #CSR payments. This led to UNSUBSIDIZED rates skyrocketing...but due to how carriers loaded it, it also led to SUBSIDIZED rates DROPPING for most. 5/
The REST of the damage from he Mandate Repeal won’t be felt until NEXT year, when people will enter the open enrollment period knowing they don’t have to pay a penalty for skipping out. This is expected to lead to ANOTHER 10% spike...possible higher. 6/ acasignups.net/18/02/06/extre…
Bottom line is that in large part due to GOP mischief/sabotage, yes, the full, unsubsidized price of ACA policies has indeed gone up dramatically since PRE-ACA plans in 2013...84% thru 2017, plus another ~30% this year for the reasons just described. 7/ acasignups.net/17/08/22/aspes…
However, not all Of the problems with the ACA can be pinned on GOP sabotage. Many, but not all. There were several real problems as well, and the two biggest ones were pretty obvious. Here’s a video explaining them along with a mess of other stuff: 8/
Since I’m guessing those reading this aren’t gonna take 17 min. to watch the whole thing, here’s the key slides to look for. The first big problem is actually a two-parter: The subsidies (tax credits) were simply a) not generous enough and b) aren’t provided to enough people. 9/
The GOOD news is that in response #CSR payments being cut off, the carriers responded with a clever workaround which ended up INCREASING the tax credits. This effectively “solved” the first half part of the problem in an ass-backwards, awkward manner. 10/
The BAD news is that the OTHER half of the problem remains: If you earn more than 400% of the Federal Poverty Line, you get bupkus. THIS is the core problem that Ms. Hurd is furious about in the NY Times article. 11/
The end result of all this is that around 9 million people earning UNDER 400% FPL are mostly (mostly) doing pretty well on #ACA exchange policies…but around ~6-7 million earning OVER 400% are increasingly squeezed/screwed. 12/
Last year the GOP caused a WHOLE lot of anger, confusion and fear by repeatedly trying to hack away at all three legs of the “stool”. Not one of their plans improved the situation, and in the end they settled on killing off most of the red leg…the individual mandate. 13/
Of course, Trump is also trying to make things even WORSE *this* year by allowing #Trumpcare plans, which basically do the same sort of sabotage to the “legs” that the various GOP plans would have last year. 14/
Meanwhile, the SECOND major flaw with the ACA has to do with the Individual Mandate…not that it existed at all, but that it was actually too SMALL to be fully effective. Many people paid the $700 penalty instead of paying several thousand $ for a policy. 15/
However, that second problem is kind of moot now, because the penalty drops to $0 per year starting next year; it’s a done deal. So, let’s go back to FIXING the problem for Ms. Hurd. 16/
There are several things which need to be done to a) repair the damage done by the GOP as well as b) repairing the *original* problems inherent in the ACA itself, but the single most obvious one would be to simply REMOVE THE 400% FPL SUBSIDY CAP. 17/
If you remove the 400% FPL cap, even without changing anything else about the ACA structure or subsidy formulas, Ms. Hurd would instantly see the premiums she pays plummet. By how much? 18/
Well, according to the article, she and her husband live in Merrimack, New Hampshire. They have one child, and the full-price cost for their previous policy (which I presume she was cool with) would’ve been $1,200/month this year. 19/
The article doesn’t say how much the Hurds earn, but it’s more than $82K/year (400% FPL for a family of 3). Let’s say they earn $100K even. If so, at $1,200/month, they’d be paying 14.4% of their income on insurance premiums. 20/
So what happens if that 400% FPL cap is removed? Instead of having to pay 14.4% of their income, they’d receive subsidies covering anything over 9.6%. Instead of paying the full $1,200/mo, they’d receive about $400/month in tax credits, knocking it down by 1/3 to $800. 21/
What about if they earn $120K/year? In that case, for the same policy, they’d get something like $244/month. Their tax credits would taper off to nothing at around $150,000/yr. 22/
Again, the tax credits would STILL drop off to nothing as your income went up—no, millionaires wouldn’t be getting subsidies—but it would be a *gradual* drop instead of the “Subsidy Cliff” as it now stands. 23/
Basically, doing this would make life much easier for the 5-6 million paying full price today (the Mrs. Hurds of the country) while *also* making the ACA exchange policies affordable for several million *others* who’ve given up on coverage altogether, mandate or no. 24/
As it happens, @SenFeinstein and several other Democratic Senators ALREADY INTRODUCED A BILL TO DO EXACTLY THIS LAST SUMMER: S. 1307: 25/
…which, of course, was promptly and utterly ignored by Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan and the GOP. 26/
That’s one reason why it’s so vitally important to retake the House/Senate this fall. Even if you’re hoping for a full-blown “Single Payer/Medicare for All” type of master plan, that’s NOT going to happen any earlier than 2021 at earliest…but fixes like this are needed ASAP. 27/
Even if you think Trump would *sign* a SP plan under a Dem House/Senate (who knows?), it’d still take a few years to ramp up, so again, fixes like this are needed ASAP for 2019/2020/2021 at the very least. 28/
I’ll leave it at that tonight. If you find my work at ACASignups.net   of value & would like to help me keep it going, please consider supporting me monthly at patreon.com/charlesgaba or one-time at gofundme.com/acasignups  Thanks! /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles #GetVaxxed! 💉

Charles #GetVaxxed! 💉 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charles_gaba

Aug 27, 2018
⚠️ GRAPHICS-HEAVY THREAD: Next week, the #TexasFoldEm lawsuit brought by 20 Republican Attorneys General against the #ACA goes to court. The Trump Administration is refusing to defend against it even though it EVERY legal expert says it’s a pile of steaming garbage. 1/
2/ If the #TexasFoldEm plaintiffs succeed, federal protections for those w/#PreExistingConditions would be gone. Not just on the individual market…people w/EMPLOYER coverage would be at risk as well, especially since most people are out of a job at least once in their lives.
3/ Here’s a reminder of the idiotic “argument” the #TexasFoldEm plaintiffs are using:
1. SCOTUS ruled the #ACA mandate is only Constitutional because it’s a tax.
2. The GOP repealed the mandate tax.
3. Therefore, they get to repeal the rest of the #ACA as well.
Really. That’s it.
Read 67 tweets
Aug 21, 2018
THREAD: For those who still don’t understand how important the #ACA #TexasFoldEm case is (along #StopKavanaugh), here’s a simple timeline of the ACA’s 3-Legged Stool:
1/ Here’s how the #ACA’s 3-Legged Stool was *supposed* to work when the law was passed. The blue leg includes the patient protections. The red leg is the part everyone hated but which served an important purpose. The green leg is the financial help for people to pay for it.
2/ This is what it ACTUALLY ended up looking like: There were two main problems. The financial assistance was cut off at 400% FPL income (& wasn’t generous enough), and the mandate penalty wasn’t strong enough to be fully effective. Both were EASILY fixable.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 13, 2018
THREAD FOR EVERYONE OVER 40 YEARS OLD:

Do you remember “Harry & Louise”?

Here’s a reminder. Watch both commercials, but especially the second one. There’s a LOT going on here:

2/ First of all, notice how in 1993, “community rating” (i.e., not being allowed to charge people more based on their health status) was considered a HORRIBLE thing.
3/ Cut to 2018: 8 yrs after the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, 89% of the public thinks it’s important NOT to charge people more for their health insurance based on their health status. EIGHTY-NINE PERCENT. This is the real legacy of the #ACA.

kff.org/health-costs/p…
Read 19 tweets
Aug 10, 2018
ATTENTION MICHIGAN RESIDENTS: I’m trying to track down the Twitter handles for the following 2018 Democratic nominees; please help if you can, thanks!

HD001: Tenisha Yancey
HD003: Wendell Byrd
HD004: Isaac Robinson
HD005: Cynthia A. Johnson
HD006: Tyrone Carter
HD012: Alex Garza
HD013: Frank Liberati
HD014: Cara Clemente
HD016: Kevin Coleman
HD022: John Chirkun
HD024: Laura Winn
HD025: Nate Shannon
HD028: Lori M. Stone
HD030: John P. Spica
HD031: William J. Sowerby
HD032: Paul Manley
HD036: Robert Murphy
HD045: Kyle Cooper
HD048: Sheryl Y. Kennedy
HD049: John D. Cherry
(yes, THAT John Cherry…he doesn’t seem to be on Twitter?)
HD050: Tim Sneller
HD051: David E. Lossing
HD054: Ronnie D. Peterson
HD056: Ernie Whiteside
HD057: Amber Pedersen
HD058: Tamara C. Barnes
HD059: Dennis B. Smith
HD063: Jennifer Aniano
Read 5 tweets
Aug 10, 2018
THREAD: Yeah, I have insomnia, so here’s some wonky info re. single payer, M4A and the Michigan Gubernatorial primary. 1/
2/ Now that the #MIGov primary is over, since the most contentious debate between El-Sayed and Whitmer (besides 'dark money') was about single-payer healthcare, let's get a few things straight:
3/ 1. "Single Payer" refers to any healthcare system where the gov’t is the payment source for healthcare providers (doctors/hospitals/drug cos/etc).
Read 44 tweets
Aug 8, 2018
🚨🚨🚨
GRAPHICS-HEAVY THREAD WARNING!
How Much More Will #ACASabotage Cost Unsubsidized Enrollees in YOUR Congressional District???
1/ Last year, I posted state-by-state infographics which broke out the estimated number of Americans who would lose healthcare coverage if each of the various #ACA repeal bills form the GOP were to become law.
2/ At first I used my own estimates, but then @EmilyG_DC and her colleagues from the Center for American Progress (@amprog) stepped up and started compiling their own projections. Their methodology was different but our estimates were generally in the same range.
Read 67 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(