I appreciate where this thread is coming from, but speaking as someone who has worked with youth and met hundreds of gen Z in the last few years
It IS a fundamentally different generation. In ways I have found staggering, if largely encouraging
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @AnaMardoll view original on Twitter
First, consider temporal context
Gen Z is the first generation of universal digital natives. Even kids growing up in the hood almost all have cell phones (and I worked with underserved youth, I saw this with my own eyes)
Not just digital natives, either. Social software natives
Moreover, Gen Z is entering a world of unprecedented wealth inequality. They are approaching adulthood at a time where all the roadmaps they came up following have been shredded.
College is no guarantee of anything. Workforce participation has contracted by 4m since 2008
Gen Z also finds itself on the doorstep of catastrophic climate change, with almost no concerted plan to stop it. The US just pulled out of the Paris accords.
In every way, Gen Z has grown up in and inherited a world on fire
Meanwhile, Gen Z is the queerest generation ever. The levels of gender fluidity and non-normative sexuality are without precedent. Parents tell me that identity is itself fluid, with kids changing their names regularly
Gen Z’s fundamental identity framework is just different
So we’ve got a generation which finds itself inheriting a world that is simply hostile to its basic needs and norms.
A world sliding toward ecological disaster. A world with limited economic opportunity
It’s also a world where they travel instantaneously, over the wire, as a matter of course, to form communities as needed.
Where kids socialize over video chat
Gen Z is at home online in a way no other group is. Not even my generation, which came of age on the internet
All this to say:
-they have nothing to lose by breaking ranks
-their forebears have failed them dramatically
-they are better networked and more effective digital communicators than any other generation
-if they don’t act, they are guaranteed to slide into the abyss
It may be so that child protesters have existed in previous ages
But I can tell you, as the generation Iraq war teenagers: my generation did not have nearly the appetite for civil disobedience Gen Z does
And I’ve been saying that long before Parkland. cf BLM
In terms of incentives, there is no group of people more aligned to burn shit down than Gen Z. And perhaps none more capable, besides
The coalition of Millennials and Gen Z is my only hope to build an engine of lasting change.
This is super simple: If Gen X and friends were going to save these kids, they woulda done it already.
No one is coming to save Gen Z. They sink or swim on their own.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @MissBilious view original on Twitter
That's what Parkland is all about. This is a generation of kids waking up to the fact that they're on their own. The grownups have nothing for them. If they want peace and prosperity, the only ones they can look to are themselves
The United States is a shithole. Massive inequality. Punishingly expensive healthcare. Extraordinary structural racism. Pathetic education completely divorced from any outcome besides standardized testing. Guns everywhere.
All this happened on previous generations' watch
You've got people who don't even have WATER
In the wealthiest country in the world, entire communities without safe or affordable water. And not just in Flint and Detroit. The rich have robbed California of its water. Whole Central Valley towns going without indoor plumbing
This situation did not come from nowhere. This situation was created, abetted, allowed by the people who came before Gen Z. It's not unreasonable for them (or anyone) to be skeptical that these same people can be trusted to put things right.
Or even to try, at this point.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“The Singularity” is a notion posited by futurists, most popularly Ray Kurzweil, about a point in the future past which we cannot make effective predictions
Kurzweil et al suggested the root of this shift would be “strong AI”
Thinking machines who’d make more thinking machines.
But I think the futurists got it wrong
There is indeed a point past which we cannot make effective predictions about the future. But it’s not ahead of us.
We’re past it. We’re off the edge of the map, where the dragons are.
We are living in an age without precedent.
The driving force of this new age we cannot forecast had nothing to do with AI
The intelligence driving this change is mundane meat, linked together, globally, constantly and instantaneously. We have no precedent to help us understand the consequences.
A lot of software developers LOVE to opine on management and management theory.
Partly, it's because like any worker, software developers are often subject to mismanagement, but unlike most workers, have a domain (code) where they have some (or significant) autonomy
But mostly, I think, we see a lot of software developers talking about management because we are paid to be system thinkers, and management is the system which most dramatically impacts our everyday lives
Often, negatively
Part of the problem of management is that it's the job of building complex systems with incomplete data and lots of pressure. You have business results to produce, you have a finite amount of time to produce them
And the ideal configuration of your components is undefined
One of the central complaints against libertarianism—and my chief concern with it—is that in espousing the supremacy of ~the market~, it takes no interest in the lingering effects of colonialism
To wit: European and US interests robbing black/brown people for hundreds of years
The effects of colonialism are not an abstract or academic topic—although libertarianism waves them off as that.
Colonialism is an economic system of extraction rationalized by the dehumanization of non-European cultures. This, as expedient to stealing their shit
This administration is building internment camps. They’re facing resistance, but so far no one within the system of checks and balances is actually stopping their long term ambition to imprison The Other.
I advise caution and vigilance.
We are at an impasse.
On one side, we have humans just trying to live.
On the other, we have people who openly, actively deny their humanity.
This is not a situation with a legal or rational resolution. This is a situation which, historically, has led to civil war.
The United States is being held hostage by a minority of people who hold a lot of guns and a lot of structural power.
I don’t think the Union is going to survive the next decade. Some of the states will go their separate ways. Or at least, they’ll try.
- are divorcing with glee and relief and exhaustion
- or despair at ever getting married because all the dudes they’re meeting ain’t shit
something is falling apart: men’s standards for themselves are collapsing, while women’s grow
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @girlziplocked view original on Twitter
Has it always been this way?
I’m leaning toward no. I think we’ve got a couple generations of men who’ve been told they’re not responsible for growing up
Smashing up against a couple generations of women who are more economically independent than ever
It IS interesting to me that a lot of the divorce I’m seeing, it’s the women who were the breadwinners. So you’ve got these dudes who don’t have the motivation or skill to work
But that isn’t even the dealbreaker. They also then don’t put effort into the relationship.