🤔Well, at least @RepAdamSchiff is now openly admitting he left a House Intelligence Committee interview in order to leak the 'closed door' discussion content to @mkraju of CNN while the interview was taking place. #Leaker
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @RepAdamSchiff view original on Twitter
Here's the background. Part 1
Part 2
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Watch the old guy's right hand closely. This was not innocuous. He's attempting to either record the police tactical belt, and/or skim the radio... Watch it a few times; you'll see.
Dana Boente's defense is to claim he was duped by Comey.
Andrew Weissmann leaked Boente handwritten notes (during call w/Comey) to MSNBC during Mueller investigation.
Boente claim against Comey does aligns w/ accusation of FBI whistleblower in charge of Comey memo collection.
DOJ Demand for Boente to exit FBI related to same FBI whistleblower connected to this issue (next two screengrabs from IG report on Comey memo handling).
1. Rod Rosenstein, Chris Wray and Dana Boente were involved the Wolfe cover-up; and the control move against Assange to protect the fraudulent basis for, and downstream purpose of, Mueller's investigation.
2. There were two groups in two administrations that held a similar purpose.
"Group One" was the original coup team; from the Obama era; and includes all of the names people are familiar with.
3. "Group Two" was the continuation group who picked up after Trump took office. Group two includes many names and appointees from the Trump administration.
The Group-2 goal was to cover for Group-1 and continue the effort beyond 2017.
Wow. Victim George Floyd and Police Officer Chauvin worked together at a restaurant near Third Precinct for over 17 years. Worked together for many years. Obviously there's more to this story than we know.
2. There has been visible signals, subtle but visible, the DOJ was about to move on a massive (the biggest in history) antitrust lawsuit against Google and all affiliates.
3. It won't surface as what most would think... in a bias based on conservative -vs- leftist ideology in content manipulation; though that will be the larger underpinning of what we will likely soon see surface.
.@AndrewCMcCarthy , Thank You. The reason I ask is a hunch FBI CR cuts (summary) was extent of the documentation. Not sure if there was 'full transcript' when FBI questioned Flynn. Ergo does use of FISA transcript as evidence against U.S. person require gaining more authority?
I have suspicion Susan Rice is requesting release of full transcript because she knows non-existent. [As used against Flynn] Which puts more distance between Obama WH and FBI Comey as rogue operation. Which was/is ongoing goal.
Apparently FBI would never use "tech cuts" in legal proceedings against U.S. person. The underlying fulsome transcript would be needed. Did that transcript ever surface? Was it created? Or was "CR Cuts" enough for FBI objective?