Sluggardo Profile picture
Feb 28, 2018 22 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
THREAD: Remember, Remainers: whenever Brexiters like Boris Johnson & Jacob Reed-Mogg say moronic attention-grabbing things (about the Camden-Islington border or whatever), *they WIN the argument even when they lose the argument*. We need to get smarter before it’s too late...
2/
When they spout this jaw-dropping shit (remember the Boris bridge?) or repeat widely discredited claims (£350m per week; EU tariffs impoverish African farmers) plenty of well-informed people jump in & prove they are wrong/stupid. They “lose the argument”. But they don’t care..
3/
They are not trying to “win the argument” (in the sense of winning ppl over & convincing those who currently don’t support Brexit that it is a good idea). They are trying to *distract* (think Lynton Crosby’s ‘dead cat’ strategy). They are setting the news agenda...
4/
Whenever they say this stuff, we (and the media, regardless of Brexit stance; it’s not only about bias & political agendas) are talking about the subject du jour which *they, the Brexiters* have chosen, not the one *we* would have chosen if we handed a blank canvas...
5/
We need the national conversation to be all about the *impact of Brexit*. Yes on the economy (it’s gonna be brutal). But *not only the economy*. Also the impact of Brexit on our families, communities, friends & neighbours among the 3 million, the UK‘s International reputation.
6/
When these issues (the real-world impact of Brexit) dominate reporting, the seemingly unstoppable momentum for Leaving falters. Each time, somebody else starts to question Brexit: “Remind me why we’re doing this again if it’s such a terrible idea?” The Brexiters know this.
7/
That’s why they keep changing the subject, throwing up eye-poppingly ridiculous or outrageous distractions. The monstrosity of what they say is the whole point and it gives the game away. Yes, they lose intellectual credibility each time - but do you think they are bothered..?
8/
No. Thanks to Article 50, time is on their side. All they care about is getting Brexit over the line on schedule so it becomes politically irreversible. They keep talking about ‘the will of the people’. But perish the thought that ‘the people’ be allowed to have 2nd thoughts!
9/
So when Boris Johnson & Jacob Rees-Mogg & the endless supply of pro-Brexit non-entities keep queuing up to make fools of themselves with these outrageous or ridiculous statements, it’s *not* because they’re fools. Quite the reverse. They know exactly what they are doing.
10/
*We* are the fools if we don’t realise this. In their eyes, they are accepting a bit of public humiliation & vilification for a noble cause: delivering the sacred Brexit.
11/
Their team is minutes away from winning the World Cup. The opposition is pressing for an equaliser. They are the player who commits a foul before a goal opportunity develops and “takes a yellow card for the team”. Plus many of them like Johnson & Rees-Mogg like the attention!
12/
For us Remainers, the bad news is two-fold...
13/
The first piece of bad news: time is running out to stop the Brexit juggernaut. A deal has to be agreed by October; if not, no-deal Brexit looms, unless Article 50 is revoked. But with no major mainstream political figure publicly contemplating this, it looks most unlikely.
14/
Second piece of bad news: the Brexiters’ technique of setting the agenda by saying stupid and/or outrageous things works. Our Remoany, evidence-loving, empirical brains are hardwired to respond to this shit. We can’t help ourselves. And the media feeds off controversy. Bingo!
15/
But there are also two pieces of good news...
16/
First piece of good news: time may be against us but the tide *is* turning. The fact that the Brexiters keep having to resort to increasingly desperate ‘dead cat’ distractions shows they are panicked. They have no answer when the national conversation is about Brexit impacts.
17/
Second piece of good news: their technique is very effective but it is *not* unbeatable. It’s almost impossible not to respond to their ‘dead cats’ but the key is to stay focused on *our* agenda...
18/
Respond swiftly & scornfully to the ‘dead cats’, then move the discussion immediately back onto the *impact of Brexit*. On the economy. On families. On communities. On friends & neighbours who are part of the 3 million. On the UK’s international reputation... Give examples.
19/
Another good technique is just to *point out what they are doing*. “X is trying to distract us with this ridiculous/offensive/divisive/bizarre comment. It’s as if he/she is afraid to discuss the defining issue facing the country: the *damage* that Brexit is doing [expand].”
20/
Remember: stay focused. Don’t be distracted. Understand what they are trying to do. We talk about what we need to talk about, not what they want us to talk about. Don’t let them manipulate you to serve their agenda.// #BrexitShambles #LeaveLiars #twats
PS
👇 is v good: applies same thinking in relation to US gun control debate. Partially inspired my thread, though it reflects my own long-standing thinking based on close study of the communication techniques used by Brexiters during EUref & subsequently.
PPS
Remember the bus? What they are doing is a reprise of that. And we are falling for it again. @MikeH_PR has over time also helped me to understand better what the Leavers are up to when they say things that seem stupid.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sluggardo

Sluggardo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eurosluggard

Aug 7, 2018
THREAD: Ahead of my semi-retirement from Twitter tomorrow, I’m going to be self-indulgent & re-up some of the stuff I’m proudest of from these past 3 years. (Spoiler: nearly all about Brexit: a mix of analysis, advice & scathing, sweary invective). [1/x]
2/
My time on Twitter has been a journey. I started out naively arguing for what I believed in, assuming our opponents were similarly acting in good faith. I’ve learnt a lot. Along the way, I’ve had fun, made friends, & valued the sense of community here when things felt bad.
3/
There’s not much to say about my first 18 months on Twitter. For the first year, I was living in Japan so it was my way of feeling connected with the politics of my home country. I felt the looming EUref was big. I argued with Leavers, including Julia H-B & Louise Mensch.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 7, 2018
THREAD: Ahead of my semi-retirement from Twitter tomorrow, I’m going to be self-indulgent & re-up some of the stuff I’m proudest of from these past 3 years. (Spoiler: nearly all about Brexit: a mix of observation, analysis, advice & scathing invective). [1/x]
2/
My time on Twitter has been a journey. I started out naively arguing for what I believed in, assuming our opponents were similarly acting in good faith. I’ve learnt a lot. Along the way, I’ve had fun, made friends, & valued the sense of community here when things felt bad.
3/
There’s not much to say about my first 18 months on Twitter. For the first year, I was living in Japan so it was my way of feeling connected with the politics of my home country. I felt the looming EUref was big. I argued with Leavers, including Julia H-B & Louise Mensch.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 3, 2018
Announcing my Twitter semi-retirement as of 8 August. Holiday, then a demanding new job; so I’m deleting Twitter from my phone. I’ll observe/like/retweet a bit & may tweet occasionally, but after 3 years it’s time for me to cut back. Thanks & best wishes to all you lovely people!
For avoidance of doubt, my views on Brexit remain unchanged: it’s a terrible idea for all the reasons I listed in this thread back in April 2017.
Ideally, it should be stopped for the sake of the country. And if it can no longer be stopped because of the scorched-earth tactics used by the zealots who promoted it to lock in their narrow EUref victory, it should be softened a) to limit the damage & b) to teach them a lesson.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 2, 2018
Tearing my hair out at well-meaning people who keep saying Alt-Right controversialists & Brexit advocates are “stupid” because they say factually wrong, obtuse or offensive things. They are *not* stupid; they are part of a highly sophisticated network running rings around us👇
We keep making the mistake of applying our standards and our rules to them. They are NOT trying to win a fact-based argument. They are not trying to convince most people that what they’re saying is true. Here’s what they are (successfully) doing:👇
- dominating news cycle & setting theme of national conversation

- generating outrage (authoritarianism, or fascism if you prefer, thrives in a climate of anger, polarisation & shouting)

- dogwhistling to a tiny radicalised minority

- grooming another susceptible minority
Read 9 tweets
Aug 2, 2018
Big problem with BBC’s justification for giving a platform to the Alt-Shite (“we don’t agree with them but they speak for a significant minority; we must let consensus be challenged”): after EUref, BBC shut down the views of those who still thought leaving the EU was a bad idea.
BBC clearly decides that *some* views which are held by a significant minority of the population, and which challenge whatever right-thinking people have decided is the new consensus are just too inconvenient and divisive to be heard. But others are not.
I just find it a bit weird that the minority view that gets frantically shut down is the one in favour of international cooperation & upholding the (admittedly shaky) consensus of the past 40 years while the one that gets airtime is the one that rests on sowing polarisation.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 30, 2018
THREAD: We are now well & truly past the stage of Brexit where satire has any meaning. There’s nothing we can do to make Brexiters’ words & ideas more ridiculous than they already are. You simply need to quote them as they are presented in supposedly pro-Brexit newspapers. (1/x)
Take this article: “May’s ‘no-deal’ Brexit stance is kamikaze say Leavers” in the ERG fanzine formerly known as the Daily Telegraph...
2/
“Brexiteers had hoped that the publication next month of dozens of documents setting out Britain’s No-Deal planning would show the impact it would have on the EU as well, giving the Prime Minister leverage in the negotiations.”
3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(