Swiss Ramble Profile picture
Mar 8, 2018 33 tweets 21 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
West Ham’s 2016/17 financial results covered their first season in the new London Stadium. Despite dropping to 11th place in the Premier League, they reported record revenue and profit. Some thoughts in the following thread #WHUFC
#WHUFC improved the bottom line by £48m, as they converted a £5m loss to £43m profit with revenue growing by 29% (£41m) to £183m. Profit on player sales was up £24m, mainly due to transfers of Dimitri Payet to Marseille and James Tomkins to Crystal Palace.
#WHUFC revenue growth was driven by the new Premier League TV deal with a net increase in broadcasting income of £33m (38%) to £119m. Commercial income also rose by £7m (25%) to £35m, while match receipts were £2m (6%) higher in the new stadium at £29m.
#WHUFC also benefited from an exceptional profit of £8.7m from the sale of the Boleyn Ground. This was sold for £38m compared to £30m value in the accounts plus another £0.7m came from the sale of various stadium assets.
On the other hand, #WHUFC saw some significant cost growth. Investment in the playing squad resulted in the wage bill growing by £10m (12%) to £95m and player amortisation increasing by £11m (32%) to £45m, while other expenses were also up £6m (23%).
#WHUFC £43m profit is very impressive (I reckon it’s the 9th best ever in the Premier League), but for some perspective all clubs that have published 2016/17 accounts to date are profitable. In fact, the club notes that 19 out of 20 Premier League clubs made a profit last season.
After a lengthy period of losses (summing to £143m in the seven years between 2007 and 2013), #WHUFC have now been profitable in three of the last four years (and the 2016 loss was less than £5m), though the 2017 profit of £43m is much higher than any previously reported figure.
#WHUFC have rarely made big money from player sales until last season. In fact, the £28m registered in 2016/17 is higher than the money made from this activity for the previous 8 seasons combined. The adverse impact of numerous exceptional items seems to be a thing of the past.
The last time that #WHUFC EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation & Amortisation), which can be considered as a proxy for cash operating profit, was negative was 2012, when they were in the Championship. Since then, it has steadily risen from £(8)m to £58m in 2017.
As a result of this solid growth, #WHUFC EBITDA of £58m is the fifth highest in the top flight (though may be overtaken by #THFC and #LCFC when they publish their 2016/17 accounts), only behind #MUFC £200m, #AFC £138m, #MCFC £105m and #LFC £72m.
Since promotion from the Championship, #WHUFC revenue has increased four years in a row, more than doubling from the £90m in 2013 to £183m in 2017. Most of this (£67m) has been driven by TV money, which now contributes around two-thirds of total revenue.
Following the steep increase in #WHUFC 2016/17 revenue of £183m is the 8th highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by the “Big Six” and Leicester, who were boosted by Champions League money. They are effectively the “best of the rest”, just ahead of Southampton & Everton.
In fact, #WHUFC had the 17th highest revenue in the world in 2016/17 per the Deloitte Money League, largely due to the impact of the new Premier League TV deal. This is their highest ever position.
#WHUFC broadcasting income increased £33m from £86m to £119m due to the new Premier League three-year deal. This would have been £8m higher if they had repeated their 7th place finish in 2015/16. Obviously, all clubs in the top flight enjoyed similar growth.
The move to the new London Stadium only increased #WHUFC match receipts by £1.7m (6%) from £26.9m to £28.6m, partly due to competitive pricing, partly because 2016 was inflated by the “farewell Boleyn excitement” (2015 was only £19.9m). Still a long way below the top six clubs.
#WHUFC average attendance shot up from 34,910 to 56,972, though vice-chairman Karren Brady admitted, “the club would have made a similar profit had it remained at the old stadium”, which is not exactly what fans wanted to hear.
#WHUFC attendance of 56,972 was the third highest in the Premier League, only beaten by Manchester United and Arsenal, but it’s not a financial game changer. As chairman David Sullivan said in an interview, “We’re about £10m a year better off. It’s not going to change our lives.”
#WHUFC commercial income increased by £7.0m (25%) from £28.4m to £35.4m with hospitality areas sold out for next 3 years. Betway shirt sponsorship will rise £4m in 17/18, while stadium naming rights are still up for grabs after Vodafone pulled out (club gets 40% over £4m a year).
The #WHUFC wage bill increased £10m (12%) from £85m to £95m in 2016/17, reducing the wages to turnover ratio from 60% to 52% following the revenue growth. Since the club was promoted to the Premier League, revenue has grown by £94m, while wages are up £39m.
Despite the increase in the #WHUFC wage bill to £95m, this is still a fair bit lower than the top five clubs, e.g. less than half of #AFC £199m. Perhaps a better comparison is #EFC, whose wages are £10m higher than the Hammers.
The #WHUC wages to turnover ratio of 52% is one of the lowest in the Premier League, only higher than three clubs, who all have much higher revenue, namely #MUFC 45%, #AFC 47% and #THFC 48% (2015/16). The club’s ability to increase wages is constrained by the PL’s FFP rules.
#WHFC player amortisation surged 32% (£11m) from £34m to £45m, reflecting the club’s significant investment in the playing squad. This compares to a low of £10m in 2012.
Despite the growth, #WHUFC player amortisation of £45m is still only around a third of big-spending #MUFC £124m and #MCFC £122m, though it will again rise in 2017/18 after this season’s purchases (£56m to date).
Although wages represent the largest cost, it’s worth keeping an eye on #WHUFC other expenses, which were up 23% (£6m) to £32m in 2016/17, including an increase in stadium lease payments. This cost category has tripled from £11m in 2009.
As a sign of their “significant investment”, #WHUFC made player purchases of £81m in 2016/17 (Ayew, Snodgrass, Lanzini, Fonte, Masuaku, Fernandes). That makes £134m in last two seasons, around twice as much as previous two years. However, they were still outspent by Everton £92m.
#WHUFC have really ramped up their transfer spending with annual net spend (on a cash basis) averaging £31m in last 4 years compared to £6m in previous 5 years. This season shows more of the same with £23m net, including big money purchases of Arnautovic and Chicharito.
#WHUFC net debt fell by £21m; gross debt cut by £19m to £76m, while cash rose by £2m to £30m. Gross debt comprises £45m from the owners (interest reduced to 4% from 6-7%) + £30m short-term loan with Rights & Media Funding Ltd. £15m legacy bank debt was repaid during the season.
#WHUFC also repaid £4.2m (+ £2.2m accrued interest) to owners. After accounts closed they paid them £10m as partial settlement of accrued interest. The Rights £30m loan was repaid in July, but replaced by £25m loan. New director J Albert Smith provided a £9.5m interest-free loan.
#WHUFC gross debt of £76m is nowhere near the largest in the Premier League. Most notably #MUFC still have £503m even after all the Glazers’ re-financings and #AFC £227m for the “mortgage” on the Emirates stadium.
However, #WHUFC paid £5m of interest in 2016/17, which is at the higher end of the Premier League. Although Sullivan and Gold might love the club, they are not averse to charging them interest on their loans (unlike some more altruistic owners).
#WHUFC improved finances are reflected in the cash flow statement. 2016/17 cash from operations was a healthy £39m, enhanced by proceeds from the Boleyn Ground sale. This was primarily used to purchase players (£34m) and repay loans (£19m), though £8m went on stadium fit-out.
Since Sullivan and Gold arrived, majority of cash has come from club’s own operations £148m, supplemented by £75m financing from the owners (£49m loans & £26m share capital). Around two-thirds (£161m) was spent on new players, £43m on loan/interest payments and £21m on capex.
In summary, David Sullivan was right when he said, “the club is in the healthiest financial position it has been in for years.” The question that #WHUFC fans will ask is whether the owners have made the best use of these riches.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

Oct 4, 2018
#RealMadrid 2017/18 accounts cover a season when they finished third in La Liga, but won the Champions League for a third consecutive year, the fourth time in 5 years, plus the Club World Cup and European and Spanish Super Cups. Some thoughts in the following thread.
#RealMadrid profit before tax increased by €17m from €26m to €43m (profit after tax up €10m from €21m to €31m). Revenue (Madrid’s definition) rose 11% (€76m), their largest rise since 2000, to a record high of €751m, while profit on player sales was 4% (€2m) up at €54m.
All #RealMadrid revenue streams increased with the largest growth in marketing €41m (16%) to €295m, followed by international & friendly matches €13m (17%) to €100m, broadcasting €13m (8%) to €178m and membership fees & stadium revenue €8m (5%) to €174m.
Read 39 tweets
Sep 25, 2018
Manchester United are the second Premier League club after #MCFC to publish 2017/18 financial results, covering a season when they were runners-up in the league and FA Cup, but were eliminated by Sevilla in the Champions League last 16. Some thoughts in the following thread #MUFC
#MUFC profit before tax down from £57m to £26m, mainly due to higher player costs, as wage bill shot up £32m and player amortisation rose £14m, while revenue only up £9m. Tax bill increased from £17m to £63m as a change in US corporate tax rate led to a £49m non-cash write-off.
#MUFC revenue only grew £9m (2%). Only meaningful increase was broadcasting, up £10m (5%) to £204m. Commercial income was basically flat at £276m, while match day dropped £2m (2%) to £110m. Profit on player sales rose £7m to £18m.
Read 39 tweets
Sep 17, 2018
Ten years after Sheikh Mansour acquired the club, Manchester City’s 2017/18 financial results covered a season when they won the Premier League in some style, won the League Cup and reached the Champions League quarter-finals. Some thoughts in the following thread #MCFC
#MCFC profit before tax up from £0.1m (£1.1m after tax) to £10.4m, as previous season was adversely impacted by change in year-end resulting in an extra month’s costs with minimal revenue uplift. Revenue rose £27m (6%) to £500.5m, only second English club above £0.5 bln.
All #MCFC revenue streams up: commercial income rose £14m (7%) to £232m; broadcasting increased £8m (4%) to £212m; and match day was £5m (9%) higher at £57m. Profit on player sales was up £4m to £39m.
Read 37 tweets
Sep 10, 2018
Prize money for UEFA club competitions significantly increases in 2018/19, including a new coefficient ranking payment that better rewards historically successful clubs rather than those with larger national TV rights deals. Some thoughts follow on Champions League distribution.
The amount distributed to clubs in UEFA Champions League (group stage onwards) will rise €681m (54%) from €1.269 bln to €1.950 bln in 2018/19. This is split: participation €488m (25%), performance €585m (30%), TV pool €292m (15%) and coefficient rankings €585m (30%).
In 2018/19 each of the 32 clubs qualifying for Champions League group stage gets €15.25m plus €2.7m for a win and €900k for a draw. Additional prize money for each further stage reached: last 16 €9.5m, quarter-final €10.5m, semi-final €12m, final €15m and winners €19m.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 4, 2018
Atletico Madrid’s 2016/17 accounts cover a season when they finished third in La Liga and reached the semi-finals of the Champions League under coach Diego Simeone. Some thoughts on their finances in the following thread #Atleti #AúpaAtleti #AtleticoMadrid
#Atleti profit before tax improved from €1m to €5m (profit after tax up from €4m to €5m), as revenue rose €48m (21%) to a record high of €281m, though profit on player sales fell €7m to €37m. No repeat of the 15/16 €27m extraordinary charge linked to stadium development.
The main driver of the #Atleti revenue increase was the La Liga TV deal, up €31m to €99m, though Champions League TV money was €9m lower at €61m. Commercial rose €22m (41%) to €76m, while match day was €4m (11%) higher at €45m.
Read 41 tweets
Aug 27, 2018
A long-suffering Newcastle United fan asked how their financial performance compared with Tottenham Hotspur since Mike Ashley bought the club in July 2007, so here’s a few thoughts in the following thread #NUFC #THFC
Both #NUFC and #THFC have focused on profit. #NUFC have essentially broken even during Ashley’s tenure with £4m aggregate profit, while #THFC have reported an impressive £215m. Worth noting that £188m of that came in last 4 seasons, when #NUFC had a £47m loss in Championship.
#NUFC revenue has fallen by £1m since Ashley’s arrival from £87m to £86m, deflated by the lower money in the Championship. In the same period, #THFC revenue has tripled, rising £203m from £103m to £306m. In fairness, #NUFC 2018 revenue will be much higher (£175-180m estimate).
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!