Sluggardo Profile picture
Mar 8, 2018 24 tweets 9 min read Read on X
THREAD: Lots of twattish Brexiters are accusing the EU of “cherrypicking”. A few thoughts...
2/
We’ll come to what’s *really* behind these claims at the end. But first let’s take them at face value. Even if accusations of EU cherry-picking had a grain of truth in them, they are a stupid argument on several levels:
3/
a) the UK decided to leave the club, and is negotiating the terms of its departure; the EU did not decide to expel the UK, so it has a certain moral right to decide what terms it offers to a future non-member. The non-member is of course free to tell the club to ‘go whistle’.
4/
(We don’t generally accuse clubs that offer non-members limited rights in exchange for pricey pay-as-you go terms of unfair cherrypicking. “I ended my membership of the local gym; now they want me to pay an expensive day-rate to use their facilities! That’s cherrypicking!”
5/
b) In light of the above, Brexit twats whingeing about EU “cherrypicking” is not going to help the UK in its negotiations. The EU is going to be singularly unmoved, and is not going to change its position because some loudmouth twats on the other side complain of unfairness.
6/
It’s a sad truth of international negotiations (twattish Brexit shysters & those who swallowed their bullshit are now discovering this to their cost) that, once you step outside an established framework of rules & embark on a 2-way negotiation, relative strength matters a lot.
7/
Each side looks out for its own interests. The stronger side can set the terms & decide what is in scope & what is out of scope. The weaker side gets to complain the other side is acting unfairly. If you’re complaining the other side is acting unfairly, you’re not winning...
8/
...and it should be clear by now to most that (despite the initial we-hold-all-the-cards & they-need-us-more-than-we-need-them bluster of many Brexiters) the UK is not the stronger party in this negotiation.
9/
(It’s true that some Brexit twats have their heads so far up the arse of exceptionalist denial & fantasy that they haven’t cottoned on to the actual balance of power in this negotiation yet.)
10/
Anyway, the EU side will not “punish” the UK, in the sense of deliberately offering punitive terms. In the EU view, the UK had a highly favourable deal as a member state (all the benefits of membership plus opt-outs from certain obligations imposed on others & a rebate).
11/
The UK has chosen to give up that status & become a non-member; logically it cannot continue to enjoy the benefits of membership. (These benefits were dismissed during EUref campaign but the govt is now asking to opt back in to many of them, so it knows that they are real.)
12/
As some EU leaders said immediately after EUref: “There’s no need to punish the UK; Brexit is punishment enough- the UK is punishing itself by giving up a great package.” #BrexitShambles #twats
13/
So, based on all that, I don’t think debating whether or not the EU is “cherrypicking” is a particularly useful way of thinking about what is going on. Let’s not forget, also, that the EU has been extraordinarily consistent...
14/
...In terms of what benefits are potentially available to the UK as a non-member, and what the broad options are, the EU is applying the position it said from the outset that it would apply. #BrexitShambles #twats
15/
So, the twattish Brexiters who are now accusing the EU of cherrypicking are either disingenuous (surely not!) or delusional (surely not!)...

#BrexitShambles #twats
16/
...Or (in the case of those Ministers & civil servants who know in their heart of hearts that Brexit is an utter clusterfuck but are trying to “make the best of it” i.e. limit the damage) they are just looking a bit desperate when they say the EU is “cherrypicking”.
17/
But (and I’m finally coming, as promised at the beginning, to what is really going on here) that doesn’t mean that all those who are disingenuously complaining in the media about “EU cherrypicking” are necessarily stupid...
18/
Their message of complaint about “EU cherrypicking” is not really aimed at the EU; it is aimed at UK public opinion...
19/
As I & numerous others have argued before👇, despite their apparent twattishness, Brexiters are running an extremely sophisticated communications campaign with a clear objective...
20/
Their objective is to distract from the *impact* of Brexit on the country & to prevent public opinion swinging against Brexit until it is too late (this autumn).
21/
So the message about “EU cherrypicking” is really aimed at UK voters who either supported Brexit or who feel that “we had a vote & now we should get on with it” (between them still ~50%). It is designed to stop them wavering in their support for (or acquiescence in) Brexit...
22/
The message these smart, devious, manipulative people who are pushing Brexit want to get across with these accusations of “EU cherrypicking” are:
-the EU is acting unfairly
-the EU is acting hypocritically
So...
23/
..”so don’t think about what a mess Brexit & all the damage it is doing or question whether we really need to go through with it - but rather ask yourself whether we want to have anything to do with an organisation that behaves so unfairly or hypocritically”...
24/
...we shouldn’t be surprised: Leave liars gonna lie (it’s what they do); manipulators gonna manipulate.// #LeaveLiars #BrexitShambles #twats

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sluggardo

Sluggardo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eurosluggard

Aug 7, 2018
THREAD: Ahead of my semi-retirement from Twitter tomorrow, I’m going to be self-indulgent & re-up some of the stuff I’m proudest of from these past 3 years. (Spoiler: nearly all about Brexit: a mix of analysis, advice & scathing, sweary invective). [1/x]
2/
My time on Twitter has been a journey. I started out naively arguing for what I believed in, assuming our opponents were similarly acting in good faith. I’ve learnt a lot. Along the way, I’ve had fun, made friends, & valued the sense of community here when things felt bad.
3/
There’s not much to say about my first 18 months on Twitter. For the first year, I was living in Japan so it was my way of feeling connected with the politics of my home country. I felt the looming EUref was big. I argued with Leavers, including Julia H-B & Louise Mensch.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 7, 2018
THREAD: Ahead of my semi-retirement from Twitter tomorrow, I’m going to be self-indulgent & re-up some of the stuff I’m proudest of from these past 3 years. (Spoiler: nearly all about Brexit: a mix of observation, analysis, advice & scathing invective). [1/x]
2/
My time on Twitter has been a journey. I started out naively arguing for what I believed in, assuming our opponents were similarly acting in good faith. I’ve learnt a lot. Along the way, I’ve had fun, made friends, & valued the sense of community here when things felt bad.
3/
There’s not much to say about my first 18 months on Twitter. For the first year, I was living in Japan so it was my way of feeling connected with the politics of my home country. I felt the looming EUref was big. I argued with Leavers, including Julia H-B & Louise Mensch.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 3, 2018
Announcing my Twitter semi-retirement as of 8 August. Holiday, then a demanding new job; so I’m deleting Twitter from my phone. I’ll observe/like/retweet a bit & may tweet occasionally, but after 3 years it’s time for me to cut back. Thanks & best wishes to all you lovely people!
For avoidance of doubt, my views on Brexit remain unchanged: it’s a terrible idea for all the reasons I listed in this thread back in April 2017.
Ideally, it should be stopped for the sake of the country. And if it can no longer be stopped because of the scorched-earth tactics used by the zealots who promoted it to lock in their narrow EUref victory, it should be softened a) to limit the damage & b) to teach them a lesson.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 2, 2018
Tearing my hair out at well-meaning people who keep saying Alt-Right controversialists & Brexit advocates are “stupid” because they say factually wrong, obtuse or offensive things. They are *not* stupid; they are part of a highly sophisticated network running rings around us👇
We keep making the mistake of applying our standards and our rules to them. They are NOT trying to win a fact-based argument. They are not trying to convince most people that what they’re saying is true. Here’s what they are (successfully) doing:👇
- dominating news cycle & setting theme of national conversation

- generating outrage (authoritarianism, or fascism if you prefer, thrives in a climate of anger, polarisation & shouting)

- dogwhistling to a tiny radicalised minority

- grooming another susceptible minority
Read 9 tweets
Aug 2, 2018
Big problem with BBC’s justification for giving a platform to the Alt-Shite (“we don’t agree with them but they speak for a significant minority; we must let consensus be challenged”): after EUref, BBC shut down the views of those who still thought leaving the EU was a bad idea.
BBC clearly decides that *some* views which are held by a significant minority of the population, and which challenge whatever right-thinking people have decided is the new consensus are just too inconvenient and divisive to be heard. But others are not.
I just find it a bit weird that the minority view that gets frantically shut down is the one in favour of international cooperation & upholding the (admittedly shaky) consensus of the past 40 years while the one that gets airtime is the one that rests on sowing polarisation.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 30, 2018
THREAD: We are now well & truly past the stage of Brexit where satire has any meaning. There’s nothing we can do to make Brexiters’ words & ideas more ridiculous than they already are. You simply need to quote them as they are presented in supposedly pro-Brexit newspapers. (1/x)
Take this article: “May’s ‘no-deal’ Brexit stance is kamikaze say Leavers” in the ERG fanzine formerly known as the Daily Telegraph...
2/
“Brexiteers had hoped that the publication next month of dozens of documents setting out Britain’s No-Deal planning would show the impact it would have on the EU as well, giving the Prime Minister leverage in the negotiations.”
3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(