Please read all 2000+ pages @LarrySchweikart ... I respect your opinion, but I do disagree with you on this matter. Obama did the exact same with "appropriated" funds after authorization to carry out his agenda. This is no different, PLUS it falls under "National Security"
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @LarrySchweikart view original on Twitter
The President of the United States, by definition, is charged as a primary function for National Security. In the Constitution. Trump made it crystal clear he signed the Omnibus SPENDING bill for that reason alone. Begrudgingly.
The military spending, something he was after from day 1, was included, and at a very healthy amount. There are also appropriations for various other items Trump wanted, but the military was by far the biggest win.
$34 Billion exists right off the top for miscellaneous expenses related to NATIONAL DEFENSE as authorized by the Secretary of Defense (General Mattis).... all it takes is one stroke of the pen by General Mattis, and those funds are released... they are authorized.
There are obviously sections written into the Omnibus spending bill, however, none specifically mention border walls, or prohibit the President from measures he seems necessary for National Security. This was a master Trump play... he used the VETO threat to get the military $$
Anyway, that $34 Billion is already halfway there to the estimated cost of the border wall... that is a massive head-start without even fighting for it. And we already know the WALL is being started MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2018
FURTHER: We see another $4 Billion in Department of Defense "Slush Fund" appropriations.... there for the Secretary of Defense Mattis to utilize should he see fit.
Now, for those that may be concerned about the "except for construction" clauses here and there... NONE OF WHICH are enforceable if POTUS deems it a NATIONAL SECURITY RISK... because.... CONGRESS voted to approve the #NDAA !!!! The NDAA specifically allows use of US Army CoE
Just as a refresher: US Constitution, ARTICLE II, Section 2: #1 -"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;"
With the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act of 2018 / H.R. 2810) and passage of "Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018" Congress has provided both the Authorization and funding (appropriations) for any construction the POTUS deems necessary. This ends up a #WIN
So where is this "Authorization" you ask? OK... #ShowAndTell time...
Section J:
Section J Continued:
In TITLE II: Border Security - $2 BILLION + is authorized for construction and improvements.... the Secretary of Homeland Security has discretion in these funds...
SPECIFICALLY Spelled out and Authorized additionally here... keep tabs folks... these amounts are adding up quickly to the $60 Billion Trump initially asked for:
In short: POTUS Trump KEPT HIS WORD.... He campaigned on building a wall, and whether or not he got the full funding for it in one shot, he obtained at least 50% of it through the #OmnibusBill... which, I believe he knew all along... #MilitaryAndTheWall#MissionAccomplished !
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
⚠️Hurricane Michael 11:00PM update: Forecast on track for Major Hurricane to affect Florida panhandle, coastal Alabama, with Tropical Storm winds into Mississippi and central Florida...
Hurricane Warnings are active along most of northwestern Florida and coastal Alabama at this hour. Tropical Storm Warnings south central areas of west coast Florida and coastal Alabama. Watches extend west and south of warned areas.
Wind probability graphics for the warmer areas:
1. Hurricane force winds; 2. 50 KT winds; 3. Tropical Storm force winds
Do you think University Academia has gone bonkers? You’re not imagining it. Left leaning hoaxers expose Academia bias to publish literately “junk research.”
🚨 FACT CHECK: Danielle Muscato makes the claim that men are more violent than women (thus the need for a 9PM curfew for all males).
(2008-2017)
1. Men had a 25.1% DECLINE in violent behaviors; 2. WOMEN, have had only a 14% decline;
Men are becoming less violent; women more
From 2013-2017, WOMEN have had a 58.3% INCREASE in rape arrests; men only 18.3% increase. This number is very likely to increase as more men start to come forward.
FBI Crime Statistics show that between 2013-2017, WOMEN had a 3.3% INCREASE in violent crimes against the FAMILY / CHILDREN; men had 11.4% DECREASE!
Danielle Muscato tries to sweep the sexist / racist part under the rug by self-describing it as a “thought-experiment”... that’s like saying that the KKK should be allowed to post up their hate 24/7 since, you know, it’s meant to “engage dialogue” (which is complete BS).
When you look deeper, what you see are hundreds of seemingly “abuse survivors” replying on her thread.
While I feel horrible for anyone that has gone through something as bad as sexual assault, Muscato leaves 50% of our population out of the equation: