Swiss Ramble Profile picture
Apr 3, 2018 35 tweets 19 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Queens Park Rangers recently published financial results for the 2016/17 season, when they finished 18th in the Championship, with Ian Holloway returning for a second spell as manager after replacing Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink. Some thoughts in the following thread #QPR
#QPR reduced their loss by £4.6m from £11.0m to £6.4m, their lowest deficit since 2008, as revenue rose £6.1m (15%) to £48.0m and the wage bill was cut by £10.1m (25%) to £30.7m. However, profit on player sales was down £5.4m to £7.3m and interest payable was up £3.3m to £5.7m.
The main reason for the #QPR £6.1m revenue growth was the new Premier League TV deal, which resulted in a higher parachute payment, thus increasing broadcasting income by £5.7m. Commercial income rose £0.7m, but gate receipts were £0.3m lower.
Although #QPR cut the wage bill by £10.1m, they saw cost increases elsewhere with player amortisation rising £1.2m (11%) to £11.3m and other expenses up £1.9m (18%) to £12.5m. The £3.3m interest payable increase to £5.7m is a bit misleading, as hardly anything was actually paid.
#QPR £6m loss is around mid-table in the Championship in 2016/17. In general, almost all clubs in this division lose money as they often gamble on promotion. Exceptions are normally due to once-off items (high player sales, loan write-offs, etc).
Few Championship clubs earn big money from player trading, so #QPR £7m profit on player sales is actually 6th highest in 16/17, even though £5m less than £13m in 15/16. Mainly due to sales of Matt Phillips to WBA & Leroy Fer to Swansea City.
#QPR have clearly changed their strategy to operate sustainably, rather than spending big. The club is still making losses, but much smaller than before. That said, total losses since Tony Fernandes took over in August 2011 are £161m (£221m if 2014 £60m loan write-off excluded).
In the past #QPR made very little money from player sales. Indeed, many players were released for nothing, e.g. Barton, Dunne, Ferdinand, Zamora, Wright-Philips. However, that has changed in last 2 seasons with club averaging £10m profit, including Austin and McCarthy in 2015/16.
#QPR new sustainable approach is highlighted by their EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation and Amortisation), which strips out profits from player sales and non-cash items. This was a horrific negative £47m in 2013 and 2014, but has steadily improved to £5m in 2016/17.
In fact, #QPR are one of just four Championship clubs that managed to generate positive EBITDA in 2016/17, and actually have the highest at £5m, ahead of Norwich City £4m. For some perspective, Nottingham Forest’s EBITDA was minus £20m.
Although #QPR revenue rose £6m (15%) to £48m in 2016/17, this was still £38m lower than the £86m in the last season in the Premier League in 2014/15. Revenue owes a lot to parachute payments (£31m in 16/17), which means that broadcasting accounts for 74% of total.
#QPR £48m revenue is the third highest in the Championship in 2016/17, though likely to be overtaken once Newcastle publish their accounts. Still a fair way below Norwich City £75m and Aston Villa £74m. The top club not benefiting from parachute payments was Brighton £29m.
Revenue is greatly influenced by those Premier League parachute payments, e.g. £41m to Villa, Newcastle & Norwich (up from £26m in 15/16 thanks to new PL TV deal). The £31m paid to #QPR gives them an advantage, though they will only have this (lower amounts) for next 2 seasons.
#QPR TV income rose 19% (£5.7m) from £29.6m to £35.3m, due to increase in parachute payment from £25.9m to £31.2m. Most clubs only get £7m, including £4.3m solidarity payment. Amounts in top flight (£151m for 1st, £93m for 20th) explain why many Championship owners spend big.
#QPR gate receipts fell by 5% (£0.3m) to £5.2m, despite hosting 3 more games at Loftus Road, as average attendance decreased from 15,994 to 14,616. The 16/17 figure is 38% (£3.2m) lower than the £8.4m peak in 11/12, and less than half of 16/17 top clubs Villa & Brighton £11m.
As might be expected, #QPR attendances are lower in the Championship with crowds dropping by more than 3,000 (18%) from the 17,800 the last time that Rangers were in the Premier League in 2014/15. The club has struggled to secure a site for a new stadium.
#QPR 14,616 attendance was only 17th largest in the Championship last season, a long way behind the top two (Newcastle 51,106 & Villa 32,107). Season ticket prices were frozen for early bird fans, but then increased after window closed.
#QPR commercial income rose 10% (£0.7m) from £6.8m to £7.5m. Shirt sponsor was Smarkets, replaced by online casino Royal Panda in 17/18, though Tony Fernandes’ AirAsia also provided sponsorship in 16/17 (per accounts). Errea is kit supplier after Dryworld deal terminated early.
Few Championship clubs earn big money commercially, so #QPR £8m is quite respectable for the division, though still a fair way below Norwich City £15m and Aston Villa £13m.
#QPR wage bill was cut by a hefty 25% (£10.1m) from £40.8m to £30.7m, though number of players, managers & coaches remained at 111. This reduced the wages to turnover ratio from 98% to a very respectable 64%, a far cry from the 195% of the Redknapp era.
To give some colour to those free spending days, #QPR’s £75m wage bill in 2013/14 is the highest ever in the Championship, a full £14m more than Villa’s £61m in 2016/17. In fact, Rangers also have the 8th largest wage bill ever in the second tier, £41m in 2015/16.
Despite the decrease, #QPR £31m wage bill is still one of the highest in the Championship, though nowhere near those boosted by parachute payments, e.g. Villa £61m, Norwich £55m. However, for some more context, it was the same as promoted Brighton.
#QPR wages to turnover ratio of 64% is actually the lowest reported to date in the Championship, even below relegated Wigan 66% and Rotherham 67%. This is obviously helped by the parachute payment, but is still a notable feat, given that 11 out of 19 clubs are more than 100%.
#QPR player amortisation rose £1.2m (11%) to £11.3m, though was still lower than the £17.1m peak in 2012/13. Worth noting that Rangers booked £11.6m of player impairment in 2014/15, the season they were relegated from the Premier League.
After the increase, #QPR player amortisation of £1m is the third highest in the Championship, only behind Aston Villa £24m and Norwich City £17m, though above Wolves £8m.
#QPR spent £15m on players in 16/17 (Sylla, Borysiuk, Bidwell, Cousins, Lynch & N’Gbakoto), one of highest in Championship, though significantly outspent by Villa £88m & Wolves £32m. That meant £25m spent by Rangers in last 2 seasons, around half of £48m in preceding 2 seasons.
On a cash basis #QPR gross spend on players has obviously diminished in the 2 years since relegation, though the reduction in average annual net spend from £21m between 2011 and 2015 to just £1m in the last 2 seasons is also due to the increase in player sales.
#QPR gross debt rose £3m to £50m, as shareholder loan up £10m to £46m, while bank loan down £7m to £4m. Shareholder loans carry high interest rate (£30m at 1% per month, £16m at 2% per month), though £7.5m charged was capitalised. Bank loan charged at LIBOR + 3.5%.
#QPR debt of £50m is by no means the largest in Championship, e.g. Brighton £207m (new stadium & training ground), Cardiff £127m & Ipswich £89m That said, would have been much higher without £193m of debt being capitalised (including £181m in 2016) and £60m write-off in 2014.
Although debt is high in the Championship, most of it is provided by owners who charge little or no interest. Despite the exorbitant interest rates on #QPR shareholder loans, club only paid £200k in 2016/17, as owners converted the interest payable (£5.7m in 16/17) into equity.
#QPR received £12m in shareholder financing in 2016/17 (all from Ruben Gnanalingam) and repaid £7.5m of the bank loan. They also got £1m from operating activities. There was a £3m decrease in cash balance following £8m net spend on players and £1m on capex.
Since Tony Fernandes’ arrival, the owners have pumped £234m into the club. In that period #QPR have spent most of this on covering operating losses (£129m) and net player purchases (£86m). Only £11m has been invested in infrastructure.
#QPR have not made any provision for the EFL £40m fine for breaching FFP regulations, even though the arbitration panel has dismissed the club’s claim that the rules were unlawful and the fine disproportionate. Rangers have appealed the decision.
In theory, #QPR reduced losses should remove any future FFP problems, especially as can exclude academy, community & infrastructure (which I estimate at £4m a year). FFP is assessed over a three-year period (current season plus previous two seasons).
#QPR should be praised for turning the club around. It is much better managed than the last time they were in the Championship when they spent like crazy. However, they will need to recognise that parachute payments will not go on forever and cut their cloth accordingly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

Oct 4, 2018
#RealMadrid 2017/18 accounts cover a season when they finished third in La Liga, but won the Champions League for a third consecutive year, the fourth time in 5 years, plus the Club World Cup and European and Spanish Super Cups. Some thoughts in the following thread.
#RealMadrid profit before tax increased by €17m from €26m to €43m (profit after tax up €10m from €21m to €31m). Revenue (Madrid’s definition) rose 11% (€76m), their largest rise since 2000, to a record high of €751m, while profit on player sales was 4% (€2m) up at €54m.
All #RealMadrid revenue streams increased with the largest growth in marketing €41m (16%) to €295m, followed by international & friendly matches €13m (17%) to €100m, broadcasting €13m (8%) to €178m and membership fees & stadium revenue €8m (5%) to €174m.
Read 39 tweets
Sep 25, 2018
Manchester United are the second Premier League club after #MCFC to publish 2017/18 financial results, covering a season when they were runners-up in the league and FA Cup, but were eliminated by Sevilla in the Champions League last 16. Some thoughts in the following thread #MUFC
#MUFC profit before tax down from £57m to £26m, mainly due to higher player costs, as wage bill shot up £32m and player amortisation rose £14m, while revenue only up £9m. Tax bill increased from £17m to £63m as a change in US corporate tax rate led to a £49m non-cash write-off.
#MUFC revenue only grew £9m (2%). Only meaningful increase was broadcasting, up £10m (5%) to £204m. Commercial income was basically flat at £276m, while match day dropped £2m (2%) to £110m. Profit on player sales rose £7m to £18m.
Read 39 tweets
Sep 17, 2018
Ten years after Sheikh Mansour acquired the club, Manchester City’s 2017/18 financial results covered a season when they won the Premier League in some style, won the League Cup and reached the Champions League quarter-finals. Some thoughts in the following thread #MCFC
#MCFC profit before tax up from £0.1m (£1.1m after tax) to £10.4m, as previous season was adversely impacted by change in year-end resulting in an extra month’s costs with minimal revenue uplift. Revenue rose £27m (6%) to £500.5m, only second English club above £0.5 bln.
All #MCFC revenue streams up: commercial income rose £14m (7%) to £232m; broadcasting increased £8m (4%) to £212m; and match day was £5m (9%) higher at £57m. Profit on player sales was up £4m to £39m.
Read 37 tweets
Sep 10, 2018
Prize money for UEFA club competitions significantly increases in 2018/19, including a new coefficient ranking payment that better rewards historically successful clubs rather than those with larger national TV rights deals. Some thoughts follow on Champions League distribution.
The amount distributed to clubs in UEFA Champions League (group stage onwards) will rise €681m (54%) from €1.269 bln to €1.950 bln in 2018/19. This is split: participation €488m (25%), performance €585m (30%), TV pool €292m (15%) and coefficient rankings €585m (30%).
In 2018/19 each of the 32 clubs qualifying for Champions League group stage gets €15.25m plus €2.7m for a win and €900k for a draw. Additional prize money for each further stage reached: last 16 €9.5m, quarter-final €10.5m, semi-final €12m, final €15m and winners €19m.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 4, 2018
Atletico Madrid’s 2016/17 accounts cover a season when they finished third in La Liga and reached the semi-finals of the Champions League under coach Diego Simeone. Some thoughts on their finances in the following thread #Atleti #AúpaAtleti #AtleticoMadrid
#Atleti profit before tax improved from €1m to €5m (profit after tax up from €4m to €5m), as revenue rose €48m (21%) to a record high of €281m, though profit on player sales fell €7m to €37m. No repeat of the 15/16 €27m extraordinary charge linked to stadium development.
The main driver of the #Atleti revenue increase was the La Liga TV deal, up €31m to €99m, though Champions League TV money was €9m lower at €61m. Commercial rose €22m (41%) to €76m, while match day was €4m (11%) higher at €45m.
Read 41 tweets
Aug 27, 2018
A long-suffering Newcastle United fan asked how their financial performance compared with Tottenham Hotspur since Mike Ashley bought the club in July 2007, so here’s a few thoughts in the following thread #NUFC #THFC
Both #NUFC and #THFC have focused on profit. #NUFC have essentially broken even during Ashley’s tenure with £4m aggregate profit, while #THFC have reported an impressive £215m. Worth noting that £188m of that came in last 4 seasons, when #NUFC had a £47m loss in Championship.
#NUFC revenue has fallen by £1m since Ashley’s arrival from £87m to £86m, deflated by the lower money in the Championship. In the same period, #THFC revenue has tripled, rising £203m from £103m to £306m. In fairness, #NUFC 2018 revenue will be much higher (£175-180m estimate).
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!