Scott Lincicome Profile picture
Apr 4, 2018 12 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Ok, a quick lunchtime thread on #NotATradeWar...

Trump is actually right in one small sense: we are NOT in a "trade war" with China or anyone else...yet.
First, in sheer numerical terms, the total imports actually subject to new tariffs right now is relatively small: for example, current steel/232 tariffs are on just $29B of $2.3T in 2017 US imports; 2) Chinese tariffs on $3B in US exports are also (so far!) relatively small
Second, the latest round of tariffs on $50B more (for each side) have NOT been implemented yet: USTR issued a proposed list (subject to public comment), and China did something similar. Maybe they never get imposed. Maybe they do. We don't know yet.
That said, it's ABSURD to think this is all no big deal. First, the implemented tariffs are already causing REAL pain for US companies and farmers forced to cope with sudden/unexpected high prices & new tariffs, as well as CHAOS in various markets. That will have a REAL EFFECT.
Second, the proposed tariffs add another level of uncertainty to businesses, investment and markets. Stocks aren't volatile right now bc of potential tariffs on $100B in goods (though certain targeted cos are getting hammered)...
...They're volatile bc of uncertainty & risk - risk of MORE tariffs, less investment, lower future returns/growth, contagion. The uncertainty can also have a real impact on the REAL economy, deterring investment/growth/sales/etc - something the GOP understood only a few yrs ago
(BUT the US economy is huge and complex, and the stock market is too, so there's certainly no sure bet that markets crater bc of a few tariff announcements.)
Third, the USA's acting outside of the established global trading system places the already-weakened WTO under even more strain. If China and others defect too, the whole thing could fall apart - and that would be very, very bad for the US/global economies and national security
Finally, there are the major harms to US credibility. US trade policy is being based on executive fiat/whim ("I WANT TARIFFS") and a total disregard for consensus views on tariffs, trade balances, the WTO, etc. - views also held by the President's own @WhiteHouseCEA, btw
It's just impossible to think this won't hurt the USA's longstanding ability to lead (or at least be relied upon) in re international economic & geopolitical issues. Indeed, it's already happening, as countries refuse to engage on US FTAs and instead join each other (e.g. TPP11)
Maybe China fills this vacuum (they're certainly playing the multilateralist victim right now - aided by the USA). Maybe nobody does. But the USA's absence will hurt everyone - especially the USA.
So should we all FREAK OUT right now bc of a TRADE WAR? No. Not yet, at least. Will markets definitely tank? No, for the same reasons.
But should we just sit back and relax and act as if nothing's wrong, and everything is fine? No, of course not. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Lincicome

Scott Lincicome Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scottlincicome

Oct 1, 2018
A thread on NAFTA 2.0's Good, Bad & Ugly:
First, a BIG caveat: there's a lot here, & it'll take time to draw definitive technical conclusions (esp given how the agreement is posted ustr.gov/trade-agreemen…). These are just initial opinions & subject to change as details emerge /1
The Good:
1) as @JimPethokoukis rightly points out (aei.org/publication/tr…), this is generally a victory for pro-trade/globalization forces. NAFTA's basic free(r) trade principles (goods & services) remain, & uncertainty is reduced (tho not eliminated, yet). /2
2) there's actually some trade liberalization in this deal! (Crazy, I know) Canada opens its dairy market a little (keyword: a little - 0.34%); the US in exchange opens up a little on dairy, peanuts, & sugar. Good for consumers (tho not ideal free trade). De minimis raised too /3
Read 20 tweets
Sep 29, 2018
While I was buying grass seed at the hardware store just now, I noticed that YETI now makes a 16oz coffee mug and have never impulse-bought anything faster. It is sweeeet. #DadLife
Yesss.
Also, #ProTip for you young dads out there as we enter aeration/overseeding season: splurge on the grass seed coated with fertilizer - not only does it grow faster, but the damn birds won't eat it!
Read 4 tweets
Sep 10, 2018
PSA: the entire city of Raleigh appears to be out of portable generators #Florence
And at least one Raleigh resident is kicking himself for putting off that generator purchase that he said he'd do this year.
He's also, btw, pretty annoyed at Amazon for not letting him get 2-day Prime delivery on a sweet 8000W generator that would keep most of his house running. So much for the 21st century.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 18, 2018
And no mention of the pricetag - in taxes & higher prices - of those job "gains"
Newsflash: the Government giving a handful of well-connected companies a tariff-based monopoly in the US market can, believe it or not, increase those companies' output and employment (at least for a while) /2
The problem, especially when it comes to tariffs, is that those new jobs ALWAYS come at a VERY high, direct cost to US consumers and the US economy more broadly. /3
Read 13 tweets
Jul 25, 2018
The EU statement makes clear that the steel/aluminum tariffs remain in force (& no concrete commitments). But the tone is better, and maybe(?) no auto tariffs as long as they keep talking.
europa.eu/rapid/press-re…
Let's unpack this statement, shall we?
Paras 1-3: happytalk
Paras 4-5: an agreement to start talking about a deal for full trade liberalization in "non-auto industrial goods" (ie, no cars, no ag) + reducing barriers in services, chemicals, pharma & soybeans. AKA "TTIP Very Lite"
(A very detailed rundown of TTIP's ambition is here: ustr.gov/about-us/polic…)
Read 9 tweets
Jul 7, 2018
Also this one:
The speed with which American partisans have switched sides on "economic patriotism" - sometimes involving the exact same policy (eg solar panel protectionism) - would be breathtaking if it weren't so damn predictable and sad.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(