I read this three times to see where the headline matched what @JoyAnnReid allegedly said. It doesn't.
My takeaway from the blog Reid excerpts & her comments is in 2006 she was a Bush supporter--along with 50% of America & many now-liberal pundits. 1/ newsweek.com/anti-muslim-po…
While I find this disappointing, I also see folks who claim to be Resistance and even left, RTing folks who were actual architects of Bush policy in 2006, like @DavidFrum & @BillKristol. Or lauding @sullydish.
And folks watch & quote @BillMaher who STILL holds these views.
2/
Do NOT mistake these comments for endorsement. In 2006 I was a virulent critic of the Bush/Cheney administration and the Islamophobia that had taken root in American society.
I am merely saying I was more the outlier than Reid was re: these views in 2006.
3/
Outspoken people--particularly women, POC & other marginalized voices--are disallowed bad choices or change whereas white men like the neo-neo conservatives at @FreeBeacon are allowed endless do-overs.
A chief voice to the anti-Trump left is John Dean.
So let's get honest.
4/
The folks on the right and pseudo-left who are spending hours searching @JoyAnnReid's old blog are doing so to distract from folks with actual power--Trump in particular.
You have to ask why? Why now, why do these things matter now?
5/
Most folks evolve if they are thinking adults. They view the world around them and determine some things are truly terrible and need fixing. I think Reid has been on that path for a while now.
6/
I'd never heard of @JoyAnnReid in 2006. The Reid I've been following for the past few years and with whom I have had numerous exchanges appears not to hold those neo-con views now.
To which I say, good.
There are major voices who do hold those views now. Muslims among them.
7/
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a Muslim woman intellectual and academic whose words now, today, echo that excerpt I just read from Joy Reid.
Ali is a popular speaker and is quoted regularly by both the right and the alleged left as a feminist who "is willing to take on Islam."
So...>>
8/
>>to use the current commonality: it's complicated.
I'm no more a fan of All than I am of Gateway Pundit or National Review or any of the barely covert anti-Islamic neo-con sites still on full accepted flower and who are all concern-trolling over @JoyAnnReid c. 2006.
9/
Unlike some, I don't need to twist myself into an ideological pretzel to support today's Joy Reid and decry 2006 Joy Reid. Nor should you.
Because undoubtedly your politics were different in 2006 than they are now.
Mine are not. I wasn't Islamophobic then, I'm not now.
10/
Why did a white man who wrote declaratively for years about underage sex, rape fantasies, fluoridated water causing cancer and other disturbing POVs get a pass when he ran for POTUS in 2016 & as he does for 2020?
Explain that difference?
11/
In 2006 @JoyAnnReid was 37--two years younger than @BernieSanders was when he wrote about how mothers were making their daughter's "frigid" by not letting them have sex with adult men.
Sanders waved a hand & America said "he was young & uninformed."
Context is everything.
12/
The context is a bazillion leftists supported Charlie Hebdo regularly saying in 2015 what @JoyAnnReid seemed to support in 2006 & y'all had #JeSuisCharlie screens on your avatars, remember?
You all though Islam was trying to literally kill free speech.
Be accountable.
13/
I just want us all to keep asking where we stand on very real issues as the world keeps changing and stop erasing facts that don't fit a more convenient narrative.
People f*ck up.
Good people, decent people change and evolve.
All of them are noting how they appreciate her apology but they are to a one wondering why the MSM is focused on Reid and not Trump and what's actually harming #LGBTQ people--as I have been saying.
20/
Reid and #DanielleMoodieMills (@DeeTwoCents) are
are talking about the dialogue that needs to happen in the black community about LGBTQ people.
#DiegoSanchez says we are people who are still marginalized but that we "can get to tomorrow."
21/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't think men really understand how different it is to be a woman out in the world and how quickly things can turn dangerous.
When I was living in New Orleans, I was walking home from work one night. It was fall--dark early & foggy.
A man came out of the fog toward me.
1/
He said hi, I said hi.
As he started to pass me, he asked me if I had the time.
I looked at my watch, looked up, he had a gun pointed at me.
He hit me so fast I wasn't able to steel myself.
I fell to the ground.
He said, "I could rape you right now, but I don't have time."
2/
He wanted my money.
I had the grocery money for the entire house (I lived with 3 other people) in my purse.
He took it and disappeared into the fog.
The whole thing was maybe ten minutes, start to finish.
I was shaking so hard I could hardly get up.
My head was bleeding.
3/
The majority of the working class in America is women and POC.
And white men as a group haven't voted majority Democrat since 1964--they stopped after LBJ signed the the #VRA.
Flip the narrative and start listening to the ACTUAL working class--the rest of us.
Stop centering white men for everything.
Stop claiming only white men can save us from the damage white men did to us.
Women are the working class--my investigation here:
.@matthewstoller is very worried about white men, but it's really women of all races who are facing the worst effects of economic and social stresses.
My investigation here: damemagazine.com/2018/05/10/why…
The relentlessness of passing over superb women with strong credentials & election histories in favor of whatever man is a headline at a moment is exhausting.
Two months ago it was Avenatti. Now it's O'Rourke.
Bypassing the majority of Americans--women--is a national disgrace.
O'Rourke is fine. He is not, Harris, Gillibrand or Klobuchar.
▪Gillibrand is Congress' leader on women's rights & sexual assault victims.
▪Harris set NN2018 on fire with her speeches reclaiming identity politics.
▪ Klobuchar highlighted #Kavanaugh's unfitness for SCOTUS.
Americans MUST stop looking past women to find some man, any man to supplant them.
It took THIRTY YEARS of incredibly hard work for @HillaryClinton to get to run for POTUS. The rules for women are so different. No one sees a woman give a single speech and says "president!"
I lived in NOLA right after college.
I drank most every day, as did everyone I knew.
We were all in the domestic Peace Corps, all in our early 20s, all hardworking activists with stressful work.
We drank too much at Mardi Gras, New Year's.
It's absurd to claim #Kavanaugh didn't.
Those of us who've had alcoholics in our lives--like Klobuchar--tend to be careful about alcohol because we've been damaged by the drunks in our lives. I'm a control freak, so never liked being drunk, but lots of my friends did. What IS true, is most 20somethings drink to excess.
This new tack from the #GOP to dismiss #Kavanaugh's alcoholic drinking--& I am not saying he was/is an alcoholic, but he certainly drank like one--is just wrong. It undermines their own credibility and ignores reality: statistically the vast majority of teens/20s get drunk OFTEN.
Let's talk about sex, #Kavanaugh & Venn diagram overlap of male entitlement.
I've written a lot about sex in various contexts. In the late 80s/early 90s I also gave safe sex workshops back when folks my age were dying 24/7 from #AIDS. My 1st book was on juvenile prostitution.
1/
Most of us know consensual and non-consensual sex differ. The entirety of #Kavanaugh's defense and his defenders' outrage is predicated on the presumption that no teenaged boy knows what consent is.
THEY. KNOW.
Some, like their adult counterparts, don't care.
This is key.
2/
Since #MeToo we've seen egregious serial rapists like #BillCosby and #HarveyWeinstein exposed & attempts made to prosecute them.
But there are "lesser" sexual assaults we've given a lighter hand to: Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Louis CK--too many to list.
3/