Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #beware
Most recents (2)
Should we care about the weak and vulnerable Christian, the abused, the victim?
“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.”
The Lord
“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.”
The Lord
That warning comes from the Lord, who became a human.
Though strong, He became weak;
though imperishable, He became vulnerable;
though able to protect Himself, He let Himself be abused;
though the sovereign Judge of all, He allowed himself to become the victim.
Our Crucified God
Though strong, He became weak;
though imperishable, He became vulnerable;
though able to protect Himself, He let Himself be abused;
though the sovereign Judge of all, He allowed himself to become the victim.
Our Crucified God
The first time Jesus came, He came as a humble Lamb. He was sacrificed to atone for our wickednesses. All who believe He died and arose for them can be saved.
But the second time He comes, He will come as the wrathful Lion. He will judge the wicked and avenge the weak.
#Beware
But the second time He comes, He will come as the wrathful Lion. He will judge the wicked and avenge the weak.
#Beware
1/ #THREAD Ah, teeny tiny demographical instance of something, hastily wound up to a coy, careful kind of un-endorsement of something else, even uses paper in a medical / scientific journal to try substantiate this un-endorsement placement #Beware #BullAtWork How 'well-connected'
2/ and how reminiscent of a certain type of anti-vaccination trolling / disinformation.😬 #Questions such as: A/what percentage of the population actually use the product B/ what percentage of that specific demographic have been injured seriously, in a clinical sense or in the --
3/ particular mode described in the, eh, 'article' ? C/ So even if as seems likely this only verifiably happened to a tiny % of users,& even if the argument that it is all just public knowledge/public info. is applied so it appears to be, lets say for the heck of it, 'authentic',
