Meltem Demirors Profile picture
Jul 30, 2018 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/ as you may already know, i love developing new frameworks around various matters in #crypto and drawing analogs to existing concepts in traditional finance (recovering consultant, I know 🙄)

my latest target: the @tezos experiment and token holder activism
2/ full disclosure: I'm a #tezos token holder and will be delegating my stake to the baking crew at @tezzigator (what up josh and bo)

Here's why: reddit.com/r/tezos/commen…

now what is "baking" you may ask? a great place to start it turns out.
3/ where #bitcoin has Proof of Work and mining, #Tezos has (delegated) Proof of Stake and baking. in tezos, “bakers" participate in consensus and earn the right to create blocks when a tezos "roll" (10,000 $XTZ) that they own or manage is randomly selected to create a new block
new tezzies are generated through these blocks, until 10 billion tezzies have been created (the max allowed by the protocol). the genesis block generated roughly 700M, and the remaining 9.3B will be released over time as inflation (see initial Tezos "wealth" distribution👇🏾)
5/ token holders who participate in consensus by baking or “delegating” to a baker (who participates on their behalf) will take part in this inflation, which is expected to be 5% per year.

the takeaway: participation is key to benefitting from (and protecting against) inflation
6/ so why does this matter?

because it means that if you own less than 10,000 tezzies and / or can't bake, you must hand over your economic power (read: voting rights) to someone else, or risk having your tezzies lose value do to inflation.
7/ some key features you could look at when choosing a baker today v tomorrow. this is kind of like choosing a political party in a way... and we'll get into that shortly. here's a list of services provided: mytezosbaker.com
8/ so let's rewind a bit...

if we dig deeper into the Tezos genesis block, we can see that nearly 80% of accounts originally distributed to don’t have enough tokens to participate in baking on their own, and thus their only choice is to delegate their stake to a baker.
9/ 156 accounts own more than 50% of the XTZ originally distributed. why does this matter? because of two legacy finance concepts - proxy voting and shareholder activism. let's dive right in!
10/ what we see is that larger holders of tokens are more likely to have already delegated their tokens. larger holders of tokens are likely institutions or active investors who are very vested in the outcome of the Tezos experiment.
11/ the concept of fiduciary responsibility is nascent as applied to the cryptoasset ecosystem - and it's not just about the investment process, but also what happens *after* investing. people who own shares in a company participate in governance by voting on board resolutions.
12/ if we consider “delegations” in tezos to be a close analog to proxy voting, we start to see interesting parallels emerge. owning Tezzies is certainly not owning shares, but owning XTZ does entitle a holder to participate in governance of the protocol.
13/ effectively, XTZ holders who delegate their stake to a baker *may be* selecting a proxy to “vote” on their behalf. we can't talk about voting in without talking about our favorite corporate raiders, activist shareholders, or people who are unhappy with management.
14/ for most projects, token holders have no right to participating in governance at any level of the project, aside from investors being on the Foundation or on the board of the company. however  — Tezos is a perfect protocol to test ideas around token holder activism.
15/ because the Tezos ledger is self-amending, larger holders who have more at stake financially are more incentivized to actively participate in decision making. influencing decision making is an important aspect of investing.
16/ so if i own a lot of Tezos tokens and i'm unhappy with how project is being managed, theoretically I could band together with other token holders, or aggregate a lot of votes via delegation, to force changes I want to see. remember that blockchains don’t change human nature.
17/ a motivated activist token holder can now truly build a decentralized banana republic!

all joking aside, it’s important to examine these projects, to ask questions, analyze information, and form and test new hypotheses about behavioral finance in a world of tokens.
18/ a lot of people in the Tezos community have been angry with me for suggesting this type of "command and control" structure. but ask yourself, do you know how your delegation service will handle proxy voting? if not, start asking. these things matter.
19/ we'll be publishing more this week about different classes of shareholders and what it means for corporate governance, and what different classes of tokenholders may mean for protocols. check out the original Tezos piece here and feel free to comment: medium.com/@Melt_Dem/the-…
20/ lastly, massive shout out to @farchibald_ and @Oliver_W_Stein from my research team @CoinSharesCo for the great data gathering and insightful analysis. we have a lot more content like this planned to break down tokens in the context of behavioral & corporate finance!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Meltem Demirors

Meltem Demirors Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Melt_Dem

Sep 24, 2018
1/ let's talk about today's @MakerDAO / @a16z announcement. for those who missed it, A16Z's crypto fund bought 6% of Maker tokens for $15M, at a 25% implied discount to the current price of $MKR.
2/ according to a blog post, the $15M will be used to fund the next 3 years of operating costs. i'm sure people think this is a great sign for the project - being able to recruit high quality capital. but, i think this is a massive failure in governance and project management.
3/ no vote was conducted on this matter, despite governance being a core tenant of the project: vote.makerdao.com

instead, a team decided to sell a large portion of tokens to one single investor without consulting other $MKR holders or communicating with their community.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 7, 2018
1/ in markets, investor psychology is everything. i shared my thoughts on greed, investor psychology, shitcoin, and market cannibalization at @dezentral_io in berlin and wanted to share some of these ideas here...

option b: skip directly to slides here: slideshare.net/DCGCo/how-to-n…
2/ investors in the crypto ecosystem saw everything go up and to the right. everyone in the market is feeling good, and worth a lot on paper. everyone outside the market is feeling FOMO, and wants in on some juicy returns. the narrative is "blockchain, make me money!"
3/ everyone starts looking for the next #bitcoin, #ethereum, #ripple. people begin to believe that the market will go up and to the right forever, and investors flush with paper returns from the crypto casino rush to multiply their money at the shitcoin roulette wheel.
Read 22 tweets
Sep 7, 2018
1/ a quick thread on protocols focused on location. location data is leveraged by many consumer services (Google Maps, Uber), but also by military and industrial applications. now teams are #blockchain-ing this data to make it tamper-proof (secure), verifiable, and trustless.
2/ furthermore, new applications like self driving vehicles, AI, and increasingly digitized consumer, industrial, and military services will rely on secure location information services to deliver service. example - in 2012, a military drone was hacked and "stolen" by students...
3/ several projects are working on a new form of consensus called "proof of location" to design new mechanisms for collecting, verifying, storing, and sending data about location to the services and applications that consumer this data. let's dig into proof of location.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 19, 2018
1/ decentralization is a myth. we use "decentralized" without any specificity as to what that *actually* means. let's untangle the idea of decentralization. i developed a basic grid that breaks it down at the protocol, network, and app layer (dated april 2018)
2/ a good chunk of the data comes from arewedecentralizedyet.com - the brainchild of @ummjackson - who was continuously harassed by some of the projects on his site that are... ummm... clearly not "decentralized" in any manner while marketing that narrative ad nauseum
3/ there are many different ways to view "decentralization" - @SarahJamieLewis wrote about this as well - great tweetstorm here

Read 9 tweets
Aug 8, 2018
1/ security tokens may be interesting, but i think we are far from a world where there is demand for millions of tokenized assets. let’s dive into “why” - promise this will be fun 😈
2/ i’ve been spending the last six months deeply immersed in the institutional investor community. for simplicity, let’s say the US cohort of “institutional” investors - or the TAM - for tokens is $28 trillion in AUM. (ignore new demand creation)
3/ currently, these investors allocate to things like venture and hedge funds (15%), private equity (10%), real estate (20%), equities (30%), and the remaining 25% is commodities, debt, developing markets, FX, and cash.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 2, 2018
1/ re-visiting Howard Marks' @Oaktree comments on liquidity, very relevant to crypto, and especially thinly traded or centrally owned, alts:

the key criterion [for liquidity] isn't "can you sell it?" it's "can you sell it a price equal or close to the last price?"
2/ liquidity is ephemeral. it can come and go. the liquidity of an asset often depends on which way you want to go... and which way everyone else wants to go. if you want to sell when everyone wants to buy, you're likely to find your position is highly liquid.
3/ if you want to sell when everyone wants to sell, you may find your position is totally illiquid;
selling may take a long time
require accepting a big discount
or both.
it's not illiquid or liquid; it's entirely situational.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(