#CrazyRichAsians is headed for a monster opening, and it’s essential to look at why. A full 38% of viewers so far have been Asian—we’re COMING OUT for this film as we never have in cinematic history.
But another 24% of viewers are black or Hispanic: *viewers are 62% nonwhite*.
The book #CrazyRichAsians was based on was a NYT bestseller. When the target for the book is described by folks in publishing, they say “white female, summer read, book club, 35-54.” That audience isn’t who’s filling theaters—yet.
They’re the ones who might take this to $100M.
If you haven’t seen it yet, a small spoiler. After the first 15 minutes of #CrazyRichAsians, you will not see another nonwhite person on screen. Not even in background shots. And the only white people with speaking roles get played like dominoes. In the first five minutes.
But there are no black or Hispanic characters either. And yet, they’re coming out for #CrazyRichAsians. In part because major influencers like @LenaWaithe, @Ava, @kerrywashington and @Lin_Manuel are coming out for this film in a big way.
These early demos are a lesson.
In a very short period of time, America will be “majority minority,” yet the blueprint for what a marketing campaign targeted at this new America hasn’t really been laid. When a brand doesn’t know how to market a product, it falls back on what it knows: Targeting white buyers.
That has three huge impacts. 1. Campaign money/attention aren’t invested in nonwhite markets, so our communities stay “dark” to them. 2. Nonwhite-focused products are seen as niche or underperforming—or “surprising” when they succeed. 3. Fewer products are made with us in mind.
But #BlackPanther#GetOut#GirlsTrip—and on TV, #Empire#Scandal and yes, #FreshOffTheBoat—show a counterpattern. Huge turnout from the primary represented nonwhite community. Major support from other nonwhite communities. White audiences pulled in gravitationally as a result.
(I did an analysis of network TV by race that showed exactly this pattern: #Empire and #Scandal were the two major hits to thrive on majority nonwhite auds; #FreshOffTheBoat was not majority nonwhite, but overindexed massively Asian and black—with more black viewers than Asians.)
When I was asked for input on marketing #CrazyRichAsians, I said: Reverse your typical priorities. Instead of focusing most of your effort on white audiences, saturate Asians & do massive outreach to black and Hispanic influencers. You know—all the folks studios take for granted.
Because studios see the white market and say, we need to put 90% of our resources toward this group that‘s 55% of our audience. If we win white wallets, we’ll get the other 45% by default.
That’s not just bad strategy, it’s bad math. Trust me, I’m Asian.
The reality is that even if studios put 55% of resources toward white audiences and 45% toward nonwhite—just following the money!—its returns would skyrocket. The only thing preventing this, frankly, is the legacy of white supremacy that shapes what Hollywood sees as “normal.”
So brilliant, uncompromising visions by nonwhite creatives with huge potential are undermarketed, and grassroots folks within nonwhite communities have to pick up the slack. And THEN Hollywood calls #BlackPanther, #GetOut, #GirlsTrip and now #CrazyRichAsians “surprise successes.”
To WB’s credit—they listened to me and others they’d turned to for advice on #CrazyRichAsians. They had a huge influencer screening specifically for Asian Americans in April—4 months before release. They did saturation previews for Asian, as well as black and Latino audiences.
They could’ve done more (especially among black and Latino influencers) but there was some lingering fear that they were cannibalizing ticket sales. I quoted Rachel to them: “you need to play to win—not play not to lose.”
The point being that if they believed Asians would love #CrazyRichAsians then they shouldn’t be holding it back hoping for $30M in ticket sales, they should go full #StarWars and aim for $100M via fan evangelism, repeat viewing and community based grassroots brushfire support.
Again, to WB’s credit, that’s what they’ve done. But make no mistake—the black community, with #HiddenFigures#GetOut#GirlsTrip#BlackPanther, has SHOWN THE WAY on this. These were the movies I and other folks talked about as templates for #CrazyRichAsians marketing strategy.
It turns out that listening to and following black America is smart business. And politics. Who knew?
Anyway, it feels like a new chapter in Hollywood is finally beginning. I hope studios and networks are listening and shifting their pipelines and marketing budgets accordingly. Fingers remain crossed.
And if Hollywood doesn’t make more Latinx-themed movies with Latinx leads soon, it should burn to the ground.
Have a great weekend all!
Oh, and if you want a deeper dive on the phenomenon of Hollywood undervaluing nonwhite films, please read this vintage thread in which I compared GIRLS TRIP and ROUGH NIGHT:
(Correction! There are nonwhite “hotties in bikinis” in the bachelor party scene but that’s it, and it kind of is the exception that proves the point I’m making)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When we say “women,” please clarify that this means *straight cis white women*.
Gay/trans women / women of color have smelled the GOP mess for decades and they’ve voted in suit. If it’s somehow new to straight cis white women, that’s part of the problem.
White women have voted essentially 50-50 Republican/Democrat in presidential races since 1952. Only the 1964 Johnson/Goldwater race is a substantial outlier. 52% voted for Trump in 2016—against an outrageously qualified white woman. That’s just in line with long term trends.
To think this event or even this presidency means “Republicans have lost women” is bad analysis; the truth is that they have never lost straight cis white women, and they have never won gay/trans women and women of color.
“Winning women” means getting more of the latter to vote.