It's time for a #thread regarding the #NotwithstandingClause and the need for an independent judiciary as check to government tyranny. It's seems that the right forgets fundamentals of Canadian democracy whenever it is convenient. #onpoli#Bill31#Bill5
Parliamentary democracy is not the same as simple majoritarianism. The ultimate protectors of governmental legitimacy are free elections and the power of the electorate to change governments. Elections are one of many checks on Government power. #onpoli#NotwithstandingClause
It is wrong to suggest, as Doug Ford does, that anything that limits what the elected majority might wish to do, including the judiciary, is anti- democratic. This notion that parliamentary democracy resides only in majority rule is both false and dangerous. #onpoli#Bill31
The need to listen to, and accomodate minority views is essential to Canada's long term democratic stability and strength. It has often been the rule of law and the judiciary to protect and give voice to the minority view. #NotwithstandingClause#Bill31#onpoli
While judges are not elected, they play a distinctive role in Canada's constitutional democracy. To make a parliamentary system under the rule of law work, we need neutral and independent arbiters to set limits to the power of those who hold elected office #onpoli#Bill5#Bill31
Doug Ford claims that because he has a majority, there should be no check on his power until the next election. While he is saying this, he is interfering with Toronto's ability to have fair and free elections. With Section 33, what's to stop him doing it province wide? #onpoli
Parliament and the legislatures are ultimate arbiters in deciding the legislative course of the nation, subject only to the constraints imposed by the constitution and the Charter. It is up to the judiciary to act, when government fails to live up to that promise. #onpoli#Bill31
Drafting, debating, and passing legislation are political activities. Interpreting the laws and the constitution are legal activities. One legislative, the other the judiciary. One is cause, the other effect. Herein lies the difference. #NotwithstandingClause#onpoli#Bill31
The purposes of the two are completely different, the political aspect ideally looks at passing laws that are in the best interest of the people, the judicial aspect interprets the laws and ensures that they adhere to the Constitution and Charter. #onpoli#NotwithstandingClause
It's the yin and yang of Canada's Constitutional Democracy. The legislative side is not all powerful nor is the judiciary. Judges must give reasons for their decisions, the principle that all judicial decisions must be appealable to another court is proof of that. #onpoli#Bill31
To watch right wing politicians and media try and paint the judiciary as activist or politically motivated has no basis in legal or constitutional reality. It only serves to sow the seeds of dictatorship to sell distrust in the judiciary. Rant over. #onpoli#NotWithStandingClause
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Rempel experiment. I contacted 10 people that I personally knew, who were Twitter users and not very political, or yet #BlockedByRempel. I asked them one simple favour. To ask Michelle Rempel a fair immigration based question as non-partisanly as possible. #cdnpoli#ableg
Questions asked were, "While I agree that irregular immigration had increased, could we find a solution that didn't require rhetoric" or variations of it, asked directly to Michelle Rempel via a reply to one of her Tweets. #cdnpoli#ableg#BlockedByRempel
If not blocked the first time, to ask a second question along the lines of "What about your policy for irregular immigration would differ from the Liberals?" Or a variation of that. Well, the results were shocking/not shocking. #BlockedByRempel#cdnpoli#cdnmedia