Cancel Wokeness Profile picture
Oct 2, 2018 6 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Reminder: One of America's Founding Fathers ran a beer brewery, instigated street fights, & took part in brawls

The only "disqualifying temperament" for Supreme Court is being a Leftist Pansy who rules on emotion, not facts & law

Thread w/ Sam Adams' words of wisdom
"Let us remember that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom."

-Samuel Adams, Founding Father & Beer Enthusiast

aka: If we let Democrats strip away due process through character assassination, we're all doomed
"Machinations & Daring Encroachments": Vile character assassination smear campaigns

"Wicked Ministers": Democrats & their media lackeys

"Tyrannical Democrats twist the plain meaning of words and rely on emotions to trick ignorant fools into supporting them with the promise of delivering the spoils of industry earned by their more productive countrymen "

This one's obvious...Leftists are devoid of logic and controlled by emotion and preventing honest people from determining the most important matters of the republic.
Basically...the redistributionist ideas of today's Socialist Democrats are arbitrary, despotic, and unconstitutional.

So those are some words of wisdom from Sam Adams. Our beer-drinking, brawling Founding Father who makes Kavanaugh look like a choir boy


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Cancel Wokeness

Cancel Wokeness Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CancelWokeness

Sep 30, 2018
Democrats: For Blacks or Just Power?

1. "Blacks are...more likely to be wrongfully convicted than whites...for sexual assault"

Dems now want to lower the standard of proof for sexual assault claims vs men which will disproportionately hurt Black Men…
2. "At any given time, it's estimated that more than 20,000 people in prison are there over false accusations, faulty evidence or something else that went wrong, but could prove their innocence."

*Apparently false accusations DO happen*

3. "Prosecutors call cases like this “misapplied justice” — a more palatable term for arresting, prosecuting and destroying an innocent man's life. And the rate of "misapplied justice" for blacks is exponentially higher than it is for whites."

Democrats = Misapplied Justice
Read 6 tweets
Sep 28, 2018
The poem "If" by Rudyard Kipling is thoroughly apropos of this moment, Kavanaugh's performance, & @LindseyGrahamSC


If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you..,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2018
Credibility of Swetnik Accusation

1. Think back to your final days in High School. It was finally OVER! I mean it was fun and all, but coordinating house parties around parent vacations, finding booze & SAT's got old. You were finally moving on to the promise land: COLLEGE!
2. No more High School sophomores and juniors tagging along. Your own dorm room with no parents around. And of course, the fabled Epic College Parties.

And aside from growing out of the lame High School Social Scene, you'd be so much more mature, knowledgeable & refined...
3. Now you've been in college a year or two. You definitely partied, but grinding through studies took some work too so it wasn't an endless scene from Animal House. But the combination of living independently, meeting new people & learning new things definitely matured you.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 25, 2018
Dems, #MeToo, & Our Sons & Daughters

1. I was talking politics with my wife tonight and she made a great point. It's obviously horrifying thinking about your son growing up in a world where he can be a studious scholar athlete who...
2. ...graduates from Yale College & Yale Law School, remains a virgin until well after college, raises a wonderful family, rises to become an Appeals Court Judge while promoting & helping men & women of all races along the way, and after all that...
3. ...your son's life can still be left in ruin from a single uncorroborated allegation that flies in the face of his sterling reputation built over 30+ years. All because Democrats decided to throw out due process & reverse 1,000 years of civilized progress...
Read 19 tweets
Sep 5, 2018

1. Following on the thread below (did AG Lynch approve emergency FISA warrant in June 2016 based on Crowdstrike story?), if you really want to go down the rabbit hole - look at how hard Obama's DOJ fought to keep bulk collection going in 2015, the timing & players
2. On May 7, 2015 a federal Appeals Court ruled that NSA "bulk collection" of data was illegal. And on June 1, 2015 the relevant statute (Sec 215 of Patriot Act) was set to expire. So the Obama DOJ had a decision to make...…
3. Would Obama's DOJ agree with the Appeals Court decision and stop bulk collection, or fight it to keep bulk collection going? You know the answer - they fought it, & argued FISC isn't bound by Appeals Court precedent (somehow this was an open question)…
Read 22 tweets
Sep 5, 2018

1. After @JudicialWatch revealed FISC didn't hold a hearing on the Carter Page FISA application, the issue became "does FISC typically hold hearings?" That misses the point.

The question is, "Should FISC have held a hearing in THIS case?"
2. There's no question - Rule 17 of the FISA Rules of Procedure anticipate that there may be hearings.

"The judge to whom a matter is presented or assigned must determine whether a hearing is necessary and, if so, set the time and place of the hearing"…
3. So the FISC rules of procedure say there can be hearings. But that's not even the critical issue. The issue is - did Congress intend for there to be hearings in cases like *this* that are so unique and consequential?

So we have to look at the relevant statute, 50 USC Sec 1803
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!