The relentlessness of passing over superb women with strong credentials & election histories in favor of whatever man is a headline at a moment is exhausting.
Two months ago it was Avenatti. Now it's O'Rourke.
Bypassing the majority of Americans--women--is a national disgrace.
O'Rourke is fine. He is not, Harris, Gillibrand or Klobuchar.
▪Gillibrand is Congress' leader on women's rights & sexual assault victims.
▪Harris set NN2018 on fire with her speeches reclaiming identity politics.
▪ Klobuchar highlighted #Kavanaugh's unfitness for SCOTUS.
Americans MUST stop looking past women to find some man, any man to supplant them.
It took THIRTY YEARS of incredibly hard work for @HillaryClinton to get to run for POTUS. The rules for women are so different. No one sees a woman give a single speech and says "president!"
I keep seeing people say only a man can beat Trump--as if Hillary Clinton didn't get the most votes.
We do not have one person=one vote in America. We have the EC.
My vote in my state counts for half a vote. Whereas Bernie Sanders' vote in tiny VT counts as a whole vote.
I'm not sure why folks are okay with their votes being subverted to other people's choices, but 538 electors choose the president.
In 2016 they did not choose who Americans voted for.
If it had been reversed, the #GOP would have moved heaven and earth to overturn the results.
So the repeated claims by men--who overwhelmingly chose Trump--that #HillaryClinton lost are false.
@ProfCAnderson has a stunning new book out that in part explains how our votes were stolen/subverted/gerrymandered/racialized in One Person, No Vote.
Read it. She's brilliant.
#HillaryClinton's loss has been used as a stick to beat women with, rather than a platform to examine what the rest of the world can't fathom: that someone could win 3M more votes and still not be POTUS.
Again: reverse it & GOP would have installed Trump by any means necessary.
No one said after 1984 and 1988--the worst losses in Democratic presidential history--that no white guy should ever run again on the Dem ticket.
Yet the claim now is that no woman can beat Trump.
A woman beat Trump in 2016. Our system failed her and us.
Start talking up stellar women candidates the way you do any random white man.
The FACT is #HillaryClinton remains the most accomplished candidate we could have in 2020 AND the best positioned to beat Trump.
In lieu of her, we have top tier candidates in Harris & Gillibrand.
I 1st wrote about Gillibrand & Harris as our best options for 2020 in January 2017.
I haven't wavered in that assessment. These two are among the hardest working senators. Gillibrand ranks by votes as the most progressive. Harris & Gillibrand have put up innovative legislation.
Harris & Gillibrand have won more votes as senators than Bernie or Biden have running for president.
So stop clamoring for any man you can find when powerful women are right in front of you. Stop ignoring the majority of Americans.
#BetoORourke will make a far better senator for Texas than Ted Cruz.
But stoking crowds against a despised opponent is not votes. It's also not policy & it's definitely not years of hard work.
Women have to work so much harder to rise politically than men do. Misogyny is real.
All I am asking is that you work on your own #misogyny or internalized misogyny. That is what holds women back politically: YOU can't see that 50something women are fresher and better for the country than 80yr old men.
242yrs without a female leader yet 51.5% of us are women.
#Misogyny is millenias-old. We can--and must-change that.
#HillaryClinton pledged a 50/50 Cabinet as well as 40% POC--like her staff. She'd have had a black woman COS.
We lost all that to misogyny and cheating by white men gaming a system already rigged in their favor.
What better way to celebrate the centenary of suffrage in 2020 than by electing a female POTUS?
The best options for Democrats (and, actually, GOP) are female candidates.
You just have to acknowledge their power and strength.
Thank you for listening to my TED talk. 🌿
Addendum: Stop claiming you can't vote based on gender when that's what you've been doing your entire voting life: voting based on the gendered perception that only men can lead.
Every female 2020 candidate has as good/ better resume than every man running. Stop making excuses.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't think men really understand how different it is to be a woman out in the world and how quickly things can turn dangerous.
When I was living in New Orleans, I was walking home from work one night. It was fall--dark early & foggy.
A man came out of the fog toward me.
1/
He said hi, I said hi.
As he started to pass me, he asked me if I had the time.
I looked at my watch, looked up, he had a gun pointed at me.
He hit me so fast I wasn't able to steel myself.
I fell to the ground.
He said, "I could rape you right now, but I don't have time."
2/
He wanted my money.
I had the grocery money for the entire house (I lived with 3 other people) in my purse.
He took it and disappeared into the fog.
The whole thing was maybe ten minutes, start to finish.
I was shaking so hard I could hardly get up.
My head was bleeding.
3/
The majority of the working class in America is women and POC.
And white men as a group haven't voted majority Democrat since 1964--they stopped after LBJ signed the the #VRA.
Flip the narrative and start listening to the ACTUAL working class--the rest of us.
Stop centering white men for everything.
Stop claiming only white men can save us from the damage white men did to us.
Women are the working class--my investigation here:
.@matthewstoller is very worried about white men, but it's really women of all races who are facing the worst effects of economic and social stresses.
My investigation here: damemagazine.com/2018/05/10/why…
I lived in NOLA right after college.
I drank most every day, as did everyone I knew.
We were all in the domestic Peace Corps, all in our early 20s, all hardworking activists with stressful work.
We drank too much at Mardi Gras, New Year's.
It's absurd to claim #Kavanaugh didn't.
Those of us who've had alcoholics in our lives--like Klobuchar--tend to be careful about alcohol because we've been damaged by the drunks in our lives. I'm a control freak, so never liked being drunk, but lots of my friends did. What IS true, is most 20somethings drink to excess.
This new tack from the #GOP to dismiss #Kavanaugh's alcoholic drinking--& I am not saying he was/is an alcoholic, but he certainly drank like one--is just wrong. It undermines their own credibility and ignores reality: statistically the vast majority of teens/20s get drunk OFTEN.
Let's talk about sex, #Kavanaugh & Venn diagram overlap of male entitlement.
I've written a lot about sex in various contexts. In the late 80s/early 90s I also gave safe sex workshops back when folks my age were dying 24/7 from #AIDS. My 1st book was on juvenile prostitution.
1/
Most of us know consensual and non-consensual sex differ. The entirety of #Kavanaugh's defense and his defenders' outrage is predicated on the presumption that no teenaged boy knows what consent is.
THEY. KNOW.
Some, like their adult counterparts, don't care.
This is key.
2/
Since #MeToo we've seen egregious serial rapists like #BillCosby and #HarveyWeinstein exposed & attempts made to prosecute them.
But there are "lesser" sexual assaults we've given a lighter hand to: Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Louis CK--too many to list.
3/
FFS. @onthemedia just aired a long exchange of @JHockenberry's editor explaining JH couldn't really do damage to the women he sexually harassed since he's in a wheelchair!
Using #disability to excuse sexual harassment FOR WHICH JH WAS FIRED is outrageous. I'll explain why.
1/
First, like @JHockenberry, I am also paralyzed and in a wheelchair. And myriad studies have shown women who are #disabled are more likely to be sexually harassed and assaulted than non-disabled women. There is, in fact, also, an entire porn culture around women in wheelchairs.
2/
There is also a long, extended discourse about how #disabled men deserve/need sexual releases. (There is no such discourse about disabled women.) Hockenberry's editor claimed, while laughing, "he can't exactly leap up & grab someone."