Seth Abramson Profile picture
Sep 8, 2020 35 tweets 32 min read Read on X
(CONTEST THREAD) This thread compiles entries in the ongoing Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. To enter, a) photoshop the image below into a photo of your choice, b) use the hashtag #ProofofCorruption, c) post it here.

Top 4 get named—with handle—here; winner gets a signed book. Image
(ENTRIES) In this thread I'll include the top entries from the original contest thread—don't worry, I saw them all and will keep checking back there to see if there are new contenders. Future entries should be posted as comments in this thread with the hashtag #ProofofCorruption. ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 2) More contenders in the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. Keep 'em coming! Post your photoshopped images of the cover—putting it in any scene you think works for book promotion—as a reply to the first tweet in this thread. And please use the hashtag #ProofofCorruption! ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 3) More Proof of Corruption Shop Contest contenders. Top four entires get their own tweet here on the feed—including the author's handle—and the winner gets a signed copy of Proof of Corruption (incidentally, the only copy of the book itself I've ever signed, as of now). ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 4) I've been astounded by the quality of the entries—and how many came in so quickly. We had 30+ within an hour or so of me posting the first contest thread. Hopefully these revised rules will encourage continued brilliance by the readers of this feed! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 5) Here are 4 more contenders (there are 20 contenders from the first contest thread). But the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest very much remains *open*! I encourage as many people to join as wish to do so. See the first tweet in this thread for rules. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 6) Just checked my entry folder again and realized there are 4 more contenders from the first contest thread—for a total of *24* total images currently in contention. But I'm certain some of the images posted in this thread will give them a run for it! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(BOOK) For those wondering what this is about, and why it's happening now, my book Proof of Corruption is—as I write this—67 minutes from release, so I'm celebrating with a contest.

If you'd like to order the hardcover, ebook, or audiobook, here's a link: amazon.com/dp/1250272998?…
(ENTRIES 7) More contenders. ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 8) More contenders! (Remember to put the hashtag #ProofofCorruption in your entry tweets, to be certain I see them. And needless to say, if you're simply commenting on the many amazing entries in the "Proof of Corruption Shop Contest," feel free to use the hashtag also!) ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 9) Just floored by what I'm seeing. More contenders below. For a moment I wanted to say the copy of Proof of Corruption being clutched by the Queen of England like a protective barrier between her and Trump was too big... then I thought, no, it's *way* funnier oversized. ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 10) I feel like maybe this contest is giving folks a chance to be creative and do something fun in a dark time? I hope so—I really do. I can tell you that this is the most I have smiled in a long time. I mean that. Some more contest contenders below. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 11) I laughed, I gasped, I gagged. The Proof of Corruption Shop Contest has brought *all* the feelings and emotions. *Wow*—keep 'em coming! At this rate—I'll have to see—we may end up with multiple signed-copy winners. Not sure how I'm going to choose. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 12) Y'all are making this damn near impossible to judge. The scope of the creativity here... color me beyond impressed. More contenders below. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(PS) I advise those of you looking at the latest LEGO Proof of Corruption Shop Contest entry to save it to your desktop or find some other way to see it in *thumbnail* size—as you will be floored. I know I was. More contenders coming soon.
(ENTRIES 13) We're up to 52 contenders! I hope you'll look through them when you get a chance—many are *really* jawdropping—and consider tweeting them out under the #ProofofCorruption hashtag. Book-promoting aside, *so much here* is hilarious, beautiful, innovative, or all three. ImageImageImageImage
(PS2) More contenders are incoming soon! I'll be extending this contest for at least 48 hours, to give everyone a chance to be involved in the "Proof of Corruption Shop Contest" who wants to be involved. See the first tweet in this thread for the contest rules. #ProofofCorruption
(ENTRIES 14) More entries for the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest! Their creativity is outstanding. (Guidelines are in the first tweet in this thread.) If you like one in particular—see this thread—I hope you'll tweet it with the hashtag #ProofofCorruption! More contenders here: ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 15) In choosing contenders for the final awards—with this tweet there'll be 60 contenders, but the contest will be open for at least a couple more days—I consider creativity, humor, photoshopping quality and the image's appropriateness to/for the work. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 16) The range of images and moments from Trump's presidency covered in the entries to the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest is truly astounding. Kanye makes his second appearance here—but Mitch McConnell and Stormy Daniels appear now for the first time. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 17) Obama, Putin, face masks, the MAGA hat redone as a Proof of Corruption artifact—a bit of a cheat for this contest, but it's inventive so I let it slide—again we see the full range of Trump obsessions in play in the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 18) Now it's baseball, "faux-bama," video of a metaphorical "red flag" indicating corruption—shown here in snapshot—and another #metamodern entry (added to an Indiana Jones one) putting Proof of Corruption into an existing narrative project. Very cool! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 19) How could any of us have forgotten SCOTUS? Or MBS and Manafort? Shrewd readers have remedied these oversights in this most recent batch of contenders in the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. Keep the entries coming, and post/tag your favorite ones! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 20) Who's in? John Kelly is in. Trump's steaming hot covfefe is in. Michael Cohen is in. And some Barr submissions just came in. Look at the shadow work on that Trump-hurricane-relief image—it really reminds us how little Trump cares about human life. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 21) Make no mistake—this book is deadly serious. It describes harrowing crimes that endanger our country. And usually my feed is deadly serious, too. But I think even in the darkness, there has to be laughter. Thus the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 22) There's room for 12 more contenders—to make it 100 total—before I choose winners (see the first tweet for the rules of the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest). So get those final entries in, if you want! Some abstract art in this batch! And Mr. Bill! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 23) The competition will be fierce for the final 8 spots (among 100 total contenders)! I admit that I laughed really hard at one of these—you can probably guess which one. Please know that it wasn't vanity, but *laughter*, that got it to the final 100! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 24) These are the last 4 contenders (of 96 total) for the Proof of Corruption Shop Contest. I'll be announcing finalists shortly, and then I'll select the 4 winners (including the winner of a signed copy of Proof of Corruption!) soon after. Stay tuned! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(ENTRIES 25) As it turns out, we *did* have 100 contenders! Sorry for the mixup. One of these is also a finalist—the wonderful Princess Bride callback. The Donald-in-bed one is nightmare-inducing. Figuring out how to manage the 26 finalists now. More very soon! #ProofofCorruption ImageImageImageImage
(PS) Just seeing a few entries now. This one is also a finalist (there are now 27!) #ProofofCorruption Image
(PS2) Put this last one up as my feed header—just for fun, just while I'm figuring out the winners! #ProofofCorruption
(PS3) Another one I almost missed: Proof of Corruption as a fine wine. Finalist #27! Image
(PS4) Finalist #28. Image
(PS5) I think this is the best shop of this concept, so it's the last finalist (#29) before I make the final selections. Image
(PS6) I like round numbers, and I can't say "no" to making this one a finalist: #30. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Mar 16, 2021
Okay as long as we're 100% clear on the fact that New Hampshire is *not* a "GOP-leaning state" and has been pretty reliably blue for a while
(PS) Folks, Kyle was talking about national politics and national elections and as a Granite Stater I correctly pointed out that he was wrong. He, and anyone else, can suddenly switch to talking about state politics and I will probably agree at the state level we lean right here.
(PS2) I suspect many commenting here aren't New Englanders. Vermont has a GOP governor and is a blue state in national elections. Massachusetts has GOP governor and is a blue state in national elections. New Hampshire has a GOP governor and is a blue state in national elections.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 16, 2021
(🎶) This 50-year-old song sounds ~54 years old. I didn't think about its lyrics until today. Now I think it's about a British dandy—*super* high—heckling a street performer who, given organ-grinding's history, may well be an impoverished recent immigrant.
PS/ For those who don't know, I was briefly a radio DJ back in the 90s and played exclusively psychedelic music from the US and UK released between 1966 and 1971. So sometimes I'll get one of those songs stuck in my head—and realize I hear it differently now than I did in my 20s.
PS2/ I also find that posting the sort of music I really truly like here on the feed underscores better than anything else possibly could how little I actually think about trying to accrue followers. My taste in music is... very particular—and doesn't exactly bring the crowds in.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 16, 2021
Just heard Juliette Kayyam say on CNN that so far the Capitol conspiracy cases have been weak, involved 1 to 3 people, and established only that some people conspired to meet "at the Trump rally."

Uh, no.

WSJ reports that 30 to 40 Oath Keepers plotted to murder all of Congress.
I think CNN doesn't understand how many hours of research one has to put into the events of January 6 to speak competently about them on-air. Kayyem is very smart and also very qualified. Those facts have nothing to do with whether she knows much about the January 6 insurrection.
One of the many problems we have with cable news today is that analysts are selected for their credentials and their general expertise rather than their research and their specific expertise.

So we end up with very smart people saying very stupid things on very important topics.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 22, 2021
The Steele dossier remains one of the most lied-about items of the whole Trump presidency. Republicans lie about Steele's background, motivations, knowledge, funders and claims. They lie about the dossier timeline and they lie about its provenance and they lie about its accuracy.
We must also understand that it's no surprise that Republicans lie about the dossier. When the author of a dossier tells you in advance that 30% of it is likely inaccurate, as long as you lie about him telling you that and claim he didn't you can spend years pointing out the 30%.
Steele is an honorable man who had been a valuable FBI partner for years when *Republicans* approached him to try to keep Donald Trump from the presidency. When the GOP folded and accepted Trump as its Lord and Savior, a law firm hired Steele to continue his overseas work.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Folks, after *two-plus years* of hundreds of you—literally—pleading with Rachel Maddow's MSNBC program to have me on (thank you for tagging me in these kind requests), I want you to know that the staff at the show have finally *heard you* loud and clear and unfollowed this feed
PS/ The above tweet, while 100% true, is intended to be funny—as I don't sweat it one way or another whether MSNBC invites me on again (12 invitations/12 cancellations was enough for me, as I told Macmillan). But I thought folks would like to know you can stop petitioning Rachel.
PS2/ I really do appreciate the effort you all made to get the Proof series noticed by Rachel. She's a metajournalist on TV and I'm a metajournalist in print, so it made sense for there to be a synergy (and her program Twitter feed following mine for years made it seem possible).
Read 7 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
So great to be back on the BBC tonight! Felt like no time had passed at all...though in fact, I'd written a 1,000-page book since I was last on, and as I think more about that I... OK, yeah, time has passed. Writing each of the Proof books was a grueling, disorienting experience.
I remember back in August 2018, when I was working with S&S on how to create a metajournalistic epic, and it was like—I'm serious—a math problem. How do you write a book with 75+ metanarratives, 250+ narratives, 400 characters.... and no scenes, dialogue, or character exposition?
I always hoped I'd have a chance to talk to another journalist about the process of creating the Proof series, because it really did feel like trying to invent a new subgenre of nonfiction. Folks who read the Proof series don't realize how it was constructed: from the inside out.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(