Thread by @gurriersread

The problem with who or what owns a service or utility for public use, is that it may be a pervasive censoring force The far-right cultists'

2: warping spins on the USA 'free speech' ideal have all been aimed, manipulatively, towards a reflexive censorship, double paradox,a try to

3-distract, reframe, confuse, upset, provoke, hurt the 1 thing that anybody can do which is a brake on attempts at authoritarianism #SpeakUP

4-Add to such a will the machine-led, profit-led, poorly regulated&standardised monopolies who compete with each other across our very lives

5: So I'll continue to #SpeakUp, to #ask #QuestionsINeedAnswersTo, to #mull over #Mueller. I want @Twitter & @jack to know that #inequity is

6: is simply not acceptable. If they don't like it, like FB, they'll see over time that there are plenty of other entrepreneurs & developers

7: who are willing to give credence, not just lip-service, to the value, the far-reaching benefits, power, and evolutionary avant quality of

8: respecting & collaborating with everyday forces & sources of, & for, social good. 'Free Speech' isn't an enigma, nor a cypher for fiction

8: It's as plain as the nose on your face. So tech folk stop implementing & running these 'great ideas' by the seat of yr ff'ing pants Start

9: entering the grown-up game of consequences, cadavre exquis, where there is inevitable actualisation in 'real time', where purpose matters

10-where you need to prove yr credibility,& audit yr systems in an ongoing, sustainable way, just as any other service industry & / employer

11-The history of the Industrial Rev. is well known,as such,there's a case for terming, FB or any platform now, a particular type of Luddite