Thread by @MaleTruthSayer

1. #LoveWins. The very idea is as unBiblical as they come, even as they try to use Biblical language to advance their unGodly cause. But as is the case with so many issues today, #LoveWins is marketing slogan used by the left to destroy the hated West.

dailywire.com/news/24050/bar…

2. The marketing slogan #LoveWins is an outgrowth of the Cultural Marxist movement that took root in America around the 1930's, and which really began to spread through the post-war Baby Boomer generation.

3. To understand the growth of Cultural Marxism, we have to go back to the morality gap that occurred with the generation born immediately after the end of World War II -- the "Baby Boomers."

4. Various reasons, including the size of the Baby Boomer generation, combined to create a morality gap between the generations -- that is, the morals of one generation were not passed on to the next.

5. Robert Bork captures this point poignantly in his book, "Slouching Towards Gomorrah," saying "The baby boomers were a generation so large that they formed their own culture rather than being assimilated into the existing one."

amazon.com/Slouching-Towa…

6. This was especially true with the children born immediately after the War, in 1946 and 1947. Perhaps to no one's surprise, the current "leader" of this generation was born on October 26, 1947: Hillary Rodham Clinton.

6b. (The book "The Tipping Point" is also relevant here, insofar as being in the right place at the right time with the right amount of experience is concerned.)

7. This same generation, born in 1946 and 1947, reached college age around 18 years later, with the babies of 1946 reaching college age around 1964, as Freshmen. But that's only about 1/4 of a typical college campus -- not a ruling majority.

8. But by the next year (1965), colleges now had two classes of Boomers on campus. And then with one more year under their belts, by the Fall of 1966 colleges now had three generations of Boomers on campus -- the children of 1946, 47, and 48.

9. Not surprisingly, it was this very next summer that the Detroit Riots broke out -- in the summer of 1967. Also not surprisingly, Hillary Clinton was right in the midst of this godless anarchy the whole time (even if not present for every individual event of rebellion).

10. But then, a few years later, this generation graduated college and entered the workforce. They went from being "BMOC" and having an organic way to organize, to being the low man on the totem poll in the workforce.

10b. DISCLAIMER: Yes, I realize that "totem pole" isn't "politically correct." No, I don't care what you say about me in that regard. Political correctness / cultural Marxism is the cause of so many problems in America today. We will cower to your agenda no more.

11. Once in the workforce, the rebellion of the late 60's went underground as their leaders became silent, now lacking the platform they had just a few years prior while in college.

12. But once that generation hit middle age, they rose to positions of leadership in both politics and the "academy" or universities. The children born in 1946 reached their 40's in 1986 -- just in time to elect Bill Clinton President in 1992.

13. According to Bork, who was one of Hillary's professors at Yale Law, the Clintons were "the very personifications of the Sixties generation," which generation "arrived at early middle age with its ideological baggage intact."

14. "Free love" and the eventual assault on the family were also products of the radical 60's -- and more importantly, products of Cultural Marxism.

15. This isn't surprising since a fundamental tenant of Cultural Marxism is rejection of authority. This shows in their hatred for the so-called "patriarchy," the nuclear family, national boundaries, the police and military, and any other boundary or form of authority . . .

15b. Including rejection of the authority and natural boundaries of traditional sexuality and sexual morality.

16. And so just as "Free Love" was a marketing slogan that largely defined the radical 60's, "Love Wins" is the marketing slogan used to define many current issues...

16b. and in the process, to carry out the Cultural Marxist goal of destroying the boundaries and authority of the family unit, and eventually weakening and destabilizing the much-hated West in the process.

17. And so, that's where we're at today. Allowing a bunch of Cultural Marxists and Globalist "Elites" telling us that "love wins" as a way to ultimately destabilize our society even further. And what's even worse is that they hijacked the Word of God to make this "point."

18. But quite the opposite of what they'd have you believe, the left's version of "love" is not at all the type of "love" that is commanded by Christ.

19. Rather, the left's version of "love" is a form of lust and anarchy, a form of rebellion against the boundaries that God placed on sexuality, and ultimately, a rebellion against His ultimate authority in all things.

20. You see, the original New Testament manuscripts were written in Greek. And in the Greek, there are 4 primary concepts of love: eros, storge, philia, and agape.

C.S. Lewis does a great job of explaining these concepts in his book "The Four Loves": amazon.com/Four-Loves-C-S…

21. As one might imagine, "eros" is the erotic, or sexual, form of "love." Storge is the idea of empathy through familiarity. Eros is not used in the Bible at all; and storage is only used in the negative. Here's a great link: gotquestions.org/storge-love.ht…

22. Thus, neither eros (sexual love / lust) or storge (empathy through familiarity) are Biblical love -- even though sexual freedom & empathy through familiarity (particularly, "empathy" for sins, getting to know "their story," etc.) are both CRITICAL tenets of Cultural Marxism.

23. The preceding point alone should tell you all you need to know about Cultural Marxism, "Love Wins," and for that matter, the so-called "Black Church," which is largely based on "liberation theology," but I digress. BTW, Social Justice Warriors also fall in this bucket.

24. These misguided ideologies are all based on an incorrect understanding of Biblical love, and are really attempts to hijack Biblical truth to suit CM's desired goals:

Rejection of authority, removal of God from the public sphere, the ultimate destruction of the West, etc.

25. The actual forms of Biblical love are primarily agape, or the intentional, sacrificial form of love that puts others first; and to a lesser extent, philia, or "Brotherly Love." (To the latter, think of "Philadelphia," or the "City of Brotherly Love.")

26. For instance, when Jesus commanded His disciples to love each other, He wasn't commanding them to have a homosexual orgy (or any other type of sexual relations outside of marriage).

27. Rather, He was commanding them to care about each other, to serve each other, and to count each other as more significant than themselves. Through their intentional & sacrificial love for each other, the world would see them as brothers, which would magnify the Gospel.

28. Moreover, and especially with respect to our relationship with Christ, love is obedient. If we love Christ, we are to obey Him and His teachings; and if we don't obey Him, then according to His own words, we don't love Him. (John 14:23-24)

28b. The last point certainly extends to the Christian teachings on sex, sexuality, and sexual relationships as found in the Word of God, all of which is from Christ. (2 Timothy 3:16; 1 Corinthians 14:37)

29. The Christian teachings on sex, sexuality, and marriage are not only CORE tenets of the faith, but also core pillars of the country. Without these boundaries, not only will the church in any country be weakened, but the country itself will be weakened and eventually fall.

29b. And at the end of the day, aren't those the ultimate goals of Cultural Marxism / Political Correctness?

30. H/T to @alexis47695138 for pointing me to the article above. @ThomasWictor and @Imperator_Rex3, I think you guys will also enjoy this, at least to the extent that it explains the ties between "Love Wins" and Globalism / Cultural Marxism / the destruction of the West.