Thread by @JoanneDavis

1 or 2 long threads to cover
theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/15/rep…

This will be 2 long Tweets. Reading the article is also important.

1) Given the recent indictment of former uranium company transportation official, Mark Lambert, perhaps it is worthwhile revisiting the December 21st back-story to how AG Jeff Sessions announced his intention to reopen the investigation therein.

2) DECEMBER 21st, 2017 – Well, it would appear AG Sessions has instructed the DOJ to follow something similar to the basic investigative outline CTH recommended on 11/23/17 regarding #UraniumOne. When Katica discovered the FOIA documents an investigative trail

3) seemed to almost create itself.

We shared:

“Put the FBI special agent together with the unnamed FBI informant, question them, and discover what they know about the entire Uranium One deal – and there’s the road-map to tear this thing wide open.”

4) On orders of AG Sessions, DOJ prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain the evidence they found in a now #DormantCriminalInvestigation into a controversial uranium deal that critics linked to Bill/ Hillary Clinton, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News.

5) Interviews w/FBI agents are part of the DOJ's effort to fulfill a promise an assistant attorney general made to Congress last month to examine whether #SpecialCounsel was warranted to look into what has become known as the #UraniumOne deal, senior DOJ official said.

6) At issue is 2010 transaction in which the Obama Admin ALLOWED sale of U.S. URANIUM MINING FACILITIES to Russia’s STATE ATOMIC ENERGY Company. Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time, & State Dept was 1 of 9 Agencies

7) that AGREED to APPROVE the DEALl after FINDING #NO THREAT TO U.S. #NationalSecurity.

[…] In recent weeks, FBI agents who investigated the case have been asked by DOJ prosecutors to describe the results of their probe.

8) Agents also have been asked if there was any improper effort to squash a prosecution, the law enforcement sources say.

Sr. DOJ official said the questions were part of an effort by the Sessions team to get up to speed on the controversial case.

9) Here’s the prior CTH report we put together with Katica’s research in early November:
Internet researcher Katica (Twitter GOPollAnalyst) may have found the hidden thread that unravels a much bigger story within the Uranium-One Clinton-FBI scandal.

10) In an otherwise innocuous FBI FOIA FILE Katica located a notice for preservation of documents sent by an FBI special agent to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on 8/28/2015. What is interesting about the preservation request(s) are the recipients, their attachment to #CFIUS

11) (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States), and the TIMELINE of events surrounding the agent’s notification.

12) The TIME-LINE here is very important as it might change the perception of exactly what the FBI was investigating as it relates to Hillary Clinton’s EMAIL SCANDAL. Therefore a backdrop to understand content and context is important.

13) Up to now the general perception of the FBI’s involvement surrounding the Clinton emails has been against the backdrop of using a personal email server to conduct business, and the potential for unlawful transmission of classified data.

14) Additionally, the CIRCUMVENTION of official information technology protocols was the narrative most often discussed. The headlines were “Clinton used bad judgement” etc.

In essence, throughout 2015, 2016, 2017 the arguments, including FBI legal probes,

15) were thought to center around “process“. However, Katica’s discovery re-frames that argument to focus on the subject matter “CONTENT” within the emails, and NOT the process.

16) The first notification of a Clinton email problem stemmed from discovery that Sec. of State Hillary Clinton used her personal email (& server) to conduct official government business. Those initial revelations were discovered around March 2015. [New York Times, March 2nd]

17) Sometime around 8/3/2015, we discovered FBI inquiry was actually a “criminal probe“. [USA Today 8/4] – [Washington Post 8/3] – [New York Post, 8/5]. Media reporting in early August of 2015 showed FBI investigation was actually a CRIMINAL PROBE. The DATES here are IMPORTANT.

18) The discovery by Katica shows that on 8/28/2015, FBI special agent sent a notification to preserve records to: •Nuclear Regulatory Commission; •The U.S. Dept. of Treasury; •Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI James Clapper);

19) •The National Counter Terrorism Center; and the •U.S. Department of Energy (DoE).

Each of these agencies was intricately involved in the 2010 approval of the #UraniumOne deal.

20) EACH of these specific agencies is involved in the #CFIUS approval process for the purchase within the #UraniumOne deal. Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the time.

Five Days later, on 9/5/2015, the FBI special agent sent another notification for preservation of

21) records to the same agencies -beginning with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission- and adding: the National Security Agency (NSA – Admiral Mike Rogers) and the United States Secret Service (USSS).

22) The following day, on 9/3/2015, the FBI special agent submitted a supplemental notification for PRESERVATION of RECORDS to: •The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), •Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and •The Department of Defense:

23) Taken in their totality those FBI special agent notifications now encompassed EVERY MEMBER of the #CFIUS group who “signed off” on approval of the #UraniumOne deal. #TickTock🔥💣

24) It would be intellectually dishonest not to see the very likely attachment of the special agent’s action. That is to say an FBI probe originating as an outcome of information retrieved in PARALLEL to TIMING of the “criminal probe” of Sec of State Hillary Clinton’s email use.