External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @gelliottmorris view original on Twitter
Before 8PM rolls around, I want to cover what the data say to expect in this contest. This thread will start off running through my predictions, will cover how I’m projecting the race, and will turn into a live blog with graphics when the votes start to come in.
There are multiple ways to predict an election. Polls, geographic data, demographic data, etc are all useful. I’m going to run through what all these measurements could predict in #pa18. Spoiler: it’s a mixed bag for both Lamb and Saccone.
1) The polling average says that Conor Lamb is favored to win this seat, has him up 2%. A high-quality @MonmouthPoll pegged the race at Lamb +6%. But there’s a 13% margin of error on average special elec polls! Anything from Lamb +15 to Saccone +11 wouldn’t surprise me.
2) The partisan lean of this district is pretty stinking red. At Trump+20, it’s redder than nearly 2/3rds of House districts. Plugged into my House forecasting model, this estimates that Saccone should win by ~11-12%, with a large 19% margin of error (yikes). #pa18
2.5) If we combine district partisanship with polls, we get a clearer signal & better predictions, but a slightly larger margin of error than for the average than polls alone. This method has Republican Rick Saccone up 4%, but assigns just a 63% probability to his victory.
3) If we model #pa18 based on what we know from state legislative special elections since 2016, we should expect to a swing from the partisan lean of the district of roughly 14 percentage points. That projects that Saccone would win by 6%, but gives Lamb a 43% shot at an upset.
4) If we combine all predictions for #pa18 (see graph), we get a rather competitive picture. The average prediction is Saccone +5% with an average Lamb win probability of about 40%. Clearly there is some wide disagreement between methods, & ultimately this feels like 🤷♂️.
Let me put my #PA18 thoughts this way: Polling very well may be picking up on something that the normal data don’t indicate, but a Dem pickup here would be the third largest swing in a federal special since 2016 and nearly twice the average. Possible? Hell yeah. Probable? Hmm…
Whatever the #pa18 prediction may be, we’re darn close to votes rolling in now. Here’s my set of county-level benchmarks (including a cool new calculation of the share of the electorate in each area) that combines presidential and down-ballot races into one reading.
B/c there can be large variation in partisan composition and reporting rate *within* counties, I’ve also made a table of benchmarks at the precinct level (since the full table is 592 rows, this is just the 20 precincts with the closest benchmark). #pa18 thecrosstab.com/2018/03/13/pa-…
I’ll also be running a live precinct-level projection system tonight that will update the pictured table. Should be fun! Of course I’ll be on my blog’s chat room too (a perk for subscribers so I can pay web bills — go here: patreon.com/gelliottmorris) to send graphics quicker.
Tonight should be fun. Whether my punny takeaway is “Silence of the Lambs” or “Saccone of shame” depends on the voters!
I’m also keeping my eye on TN #SD14 special election tonight. The Democrat running won just 25% of the vote in the 2016 contest. Trump won by 44 in 2016
Results will be at this webpage starting at 7 CST:
We’re less an hour away from polls closing in #PA18 and tn #SD14 special elections. My live precinct-level projections of the PA race are at this spreadsheet:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @charlesrhunt view original on Twitter
Minutes away from votes in #PA18 and TN #SD14 special elections now. A reminder that the votes we get early won’t necessarily represent the outcome of the election, but it will give us ammo to make our prediction. Look at this projection map from #ALsen to see what I mean:
Whatever happens tonight, keep this in mind: it’s the AVERAGE of special election swing that is informative of November, not the outcome of any one (or two, or three) races. The trend is very bad for Republicans and either outcome tonight won’t change that
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @gelliottmorris view original on Twitter
JUST IN: Democrat Conor Lamb beats Republican Rick Saccone in #PA18 by massive 0.0 percentage point margin. Final results:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @drjjdyck view original on Twitter
2 minutes til first votes. Over/under on finishong this tex mex?
Still only 5 precincts in, so can’t make a good projection at all yet, but Lamb is beating his precinct-by-precinct Allegheny benchmarks by 9%
GOP drop-off in vote share already pretty damning. Will see if it holds. If so… Lamb will win
Precincts reporting right now in #PA18 are heavy Clinton areas. Looking good for Lamb, but Saccone could benefit from nationalized environment. Doesn’t look like trend says that’s in the cards, however.
Note: Looks like my PA-18 thread broke here. Continue reading at this tweet:
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @gelliottmorris view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the right take (if I’m reading it correctly), but let’s talk about that article claiming the Democratic wave is receding (nymag.com/daily/intellig…). Oh boy...
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @bendreyfuss view original on Twitter
Best evidence of REAL change in the wave is in actual voter behavior. If Democrats stop posting gains in special elections over time, they should worry more. Of course, they haven’t (yet?). These claims are almost all based on declining D margin in the generic ballot, which...
... is mostly an artifact of how wide you take your averages. Monthly Democratic margin in generic ballot polling has been between 7 and 9 percentage points since October of 2017. Combine with special elections, the wave looks nearly as tall as it did in March.
There are TWELVE special elections tonight! One high profile election in #AZ08, a Trump +21 congressional district, and eleven (11!) in New York, where two R seats are competitive possible flips.
Coverage to follow here. <THREAD>
With results being dumped in for #NYSpecialElections, we have our first calls of the night… 3 holds for the Democrats.
NY #SD32: D hold (Clinton +88)
NY #HD74: D hold (Clinton +74)
NY #HD80: D hold (Clinton +66)
Democrats also hold NY #HD39 (uncontested) which Clinton won by 66 points in 2015. They are batting 4/11 tonight.
27% in now. Unclear if Lamb can pull this off. He’s running out of votes in Allegheny
Not sure if anyone else is seeing this or my data is messed up, but pretty interesting nugget — seems like Clinton precincts are voting a little worse for Lamb than her, but turning out much more. R precincts going more for Saccone than Trump, but voting far less.
#New PA cong. map increases D chance of winning the House majority by 4%. They only need a 6.8% generic ballot margin now (down from 7.7) to be favored.
Diff. will be closer to 10% in Nov when uncertainty from polls is ⬇️. Redraw is a very big deal.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @gelliottmorris view original on Twitter
One major reason the new PA map is such a big gain for Democrats is that it solidifies, not just tips, PA districts in Philly burbs. Also creates one additional vulnerable R district. (Easily seen in this map made by @JMilesColeman)
My forecasting model will have new PA map in the near future. This is not just a simple switch; it’s a coding redesign, restructuring of input, & drawing new geographic files. Takes a while (for me, a student).
New #PA Congressional map is pretty much the best one Democrats could have hoped for. At least 2 pickups in neutral environment, likely ability to win 11 in current D+6 environment. Post coming
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @nate_cohn view original on Twitter
PA redraw creates map that is almost entirely drawn from scratch. Huge shifts from 2016 plan all over the place. Dems favored to win 9 seats there in almost any national environment.
(big swings mostly from renumbering, but aggregate differences are clear)