This is the BEST ARTICLE re how as both a matter of PROCEDURE & PRACTICALITY all states—yes ALL—can move to real #paperballots & manual audits in time for the 2018 midterms! But voters must make it happen bc election officials don’t want the xtra work! #PaperBallotsNow
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @LuluFriesdat view original on Twitter
1. “Last year, 22 Virginia localities converted to #paperballots within two months...”!
2. Virginia’s speedy transition to #paperballots “was possible bc absentee & provisional paperballots were already being scanned & counted by local officials in every county”!
3. “In fact, most states and counties [already] have the authority and know-how to use and tabulate #paperballots”!!!
4. “A wholesale transition to #paperballots before November [2018] is therefore possible almost everywhere”!!!!!
5. “Election officials have considerable discretionary powers & should exercise that authority—as they would in the case of a natural disaster...—to modify voting procedures to protect the 2018 elections”!! #PaperBallotsNow
6. “Adopting #paperballots & post-election audits would mean that securing the 2018 Elections is not dependent on effective technological deterrence & counter-measures 2 protect against all potential cyberattacks, an impossible task”!!!
7. “In states that do not require election audits, local boards should use their authority to mandate voting only by #paperballots, followed by audits or post-election reviews to the GREATEST EXTENT state law permits.” #PaperBallotsNow
8. What I love about this article is that it shows how ALL states can move to ALL #paperballots in time for the midterms even WITHOUT enacting new LEGISLATION requiring it!!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/