The #KochBrothers want “freedom” alright: freedom to poison our environment and sicken our kids without government interference. We cannot let them get their polluted hands on our Constitution! #NoConConthinkprogress.org/to-block-epa-r… 1/
In the midst of the Flint water crisis, House Speaker Paul Ryan wrote an op-Ed opposing the EPA’s Clean Water Act, which several #KochBrothers businesses had lobbied against. Because they want “freedom” to poison our water. 3/ google.com.mx/amp/s/www.desm…
As explained in this @NYTimes op-Ed by @paulkrugman, “What the Koch brothers have bought with their huge political outlays is, above all, freedom to pollute.” Leave it to the #Kochs to ruin a word like “freedom.” 4/ mobile.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/opi…
Here’s an article about the close and ongoing relationship among Scott Pruitt (head of the EPA), the #Kochs, and #ALEC (the Koch Machine’s legislative arm that churns out model legislation making it easier for big industry to poison the environment). prwatch.org/news/2017/03/1…
/5
As explained in this article, the #Kochs and #ALEC are behind the push for an Article V Convention of States aka Constitutional Convention to amend the US Constitution by adding a “Balanced Budget Amendment.” 6/ billmoyers.com/story/kochs-to…
But the #Kochs don’t really want a “Balanced Budget.” It’s a hoax! What they want is “freedom” from public accountability and social responsibility. The BBA is a ruse to eliminate the EPA and other federal agencies & programs like the DOE, the FDA, SS, Medicare, Medicaid, etc. 7/
Here’s a Thread on the push for Iowa to pass legislation calling for an Article V Convention of States (aka Constitutional Convention ) and how to stop it. #NoConCon 8/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
9/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VanessaTurnbul1 view original on Twitter
10/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @1SnoozyQ view original on Twitter
11/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
12/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VanessaTurnbul1 view original on Twitter
13/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VanessaTurnbul1 view original on Twitter
14/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @1SnoozyQ view original on Twitter
15/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @Ruetheday852 view original on Twitter
16/ Another post re: South Carolina with the bill numbers referenced.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VanessaTurnbul1 view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/