Dear 44% of South Carolina voters who (per this article) favor the GOP plan to add a Balanced Budget Amendment to the US Constitution, Do u realize this “balance” will be achieved by cutting SS, Medicare, the EPA, & public education?! #BBA#COS 1/ fitsnews.com/2018/03/06/hen…
2/ If you are concerned by the prospect of your legislators eliminating SS, Medicare, the EPA, & public education, plz contact your state House reps and tell them to oppose the three #ConCon bills listed in the post below. (The bills have yet to go to a floor vote in the House).
3/ The 3 pending South Carolina bills calling for a Balanced Budget Amendment (that would result in elimination of SS, Medicare, the EPA, & public education) are S0878, H3233, H4174. Find ur state House reps here & tell them to kill these bills! #NoConConopenstates.org/find_your_legi…
4/ It looks like I left off bill S86! Don’t forget to mention this one too!
5/ BTW - there are 2 separate but related groups calling 4 a Balanced Budget Amendment 2 the US Constitution via an Article V Convention of States: the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force (BBATF) & the Convention of States Project (COSP) funded by Citizens for Self Governance.
6/ Per the Economist, both BBATF and the much more recent (but better funded and even more radical) COSP expect to have the necessary 34 states to call a Convention of States aka Constitutional Convention by the end of 2019! #NoConConeconomist.com/news/briefing/…
7/ Alarmingly, @CommonCause (which opposes a #ConCon) & the National Taxpayers Union (which supports it & has long advised BBATF) say there’s a 50/50 chance that BBATF and/or COSP will reach the 34 state threshold to hold a #ConCon by 2020! (See article in post 6). #NoConCon
8/ Two of the referenced S.C. bills are BBATF bills (one House, one Senate) and two are COSP bills (one House, one Senate). So South Carolina voters will need to ask their lawmakers to vote NO on all of them if they want to keep SS, Medicare, and public education. #NoConCon
9/ On a not unrelated point, here is something else South Carolina voters must call their state lawmakers about! #PaperBallotsNow
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/