Iowa & South Carolina voters! If u care about public education, u must call ur state legislators NOW to oppose pending legislation to join the so-called "Convention of States" to amend the U.S. Constitution! This effort is backed by the #Kochs & #ALEC! Sourced info. below. 1/
2/ The #Kochs--who support and fund the pending legislation in states like Iowa and SC to call a Convention of States to amend the U.S. Constitution (see posts below)--are determined to undermine public education. commondreams.org/views/2018/02/… …
3/ Here is a handout w/ links to model legislation from #ALEC--a #Koch funded organization --that would undermine public education. #ALEC is also pushing for a Convention of States to amend the US Constitution via pending bills in states like IA and SC! alecexposed.org/w/images/7/7b/…
4/ Here’s an article re: the disturbing financial and ideological connection between the #Kochs and #ALEC, including their determination to decimate public education. thenation.com/article/alec-e…
5/ Here is a link to ALEC’s own website where it promotes an Article V Convention of States to amend the US Constitution. alec.org/model-policy/a…
6/ Here’s a link to an article explaining that #ALEC supports two different but similarly dangerous Article V projects: (1) the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force; & (2) the even more radical & broadly worded Convention of States Project. exposedbycmd.org/2017/03/23/koc…
8/ The Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force has pushed for an Article V Convention of States to amend the US Constitution for many years. Wisconsin recently became the 28th state to join that effort. #NoConConjsonline.com/story/news/pol…
9/ The Convention of States Project was launched by a group called Citizens for Self-Governance in 2015. Twelve states have already signed on. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conventio… … …
10/ In June 2017, former South Carolina senator Jim DeMint (recently ousted from the Heritage Foundation) became a senior advisor to the Convention of States project seeking to amend the US Constitution. conservativereview.com/articles/jim-d…
12/ The Council for National Policy's 2014 directory linked above shows that KA, Bannon, DeVos's father in law, the Mercers, & Pence are also members. It also shows that the CNP has set 2020 as its deadline for restoring "religion & economic freedom ... under the Constitution"!
13/ The Council for National Policy was co-founded by Paul Weyrich, who also founded ALEC and the Heritage Foundation. nytimes.com/2004/08/28/us/…;
Weyrich infamously admitted that he didn't want everyone to vote.
14/ Here's my sourced Thread on the educational goals of the Council for National Policy to which Jim DeMint (senior advisor to the Article V Convention of States Project) belongs. As shown, they include eliminating the DOE & federal education funding.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
15/ Per the Economist, both BBATF and the much more recent (but better funded and even more radical) #COSProject expect to have the necessary 34 states to call a Convention of States aka Constitutional Convention by the end of 2019! #NoConConeconomist.com/news/briefing/… …
16/ The Iowa House already PASSED Joint Resolution 8, the #COSProject resolution for an Article V Convention of States. As of 4/23/18, the IA legislature remains in session, and @IowaDemocrats expects the state senate to vote on JR8 this week! Link to JR8: legis.iowa.gov/legislation/Bi…
17/ Here is a link to the Iowa senate leadership, including links to their emails and phone numbers. Pls contact them NOW and tell them to oppose JR8, the resolution calling for an Article V Convention of States to amend the US Constitution! legis.iowa.gov/legislators/le…
18/ South Carolina voters must call or email members of the SC House Judiciary Committee & tell them to oppose H3233 (#COSProject resolution for an Article V Convention of States) & H3473 (Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force resolution for an Article V Convention of States).
20. SC voters must also contact members of the SC SENATE Judiciary Committee & tell them to oppose S86 (#COSProject resolution for an Article V Convention of States) and S547 (Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force resolution for an Article V Convention of States)!
21. Here is a link to members of the South Carolina SENATE Judiciary Commitee, including links to their contact info. scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/…
22. Finally, here is a link for South Carolina voters to review the status of the Article V bills discussed in this Thread: H3233, H3473, S86, and S547. scstatehouse.gov/billsearch.php
23. Here is another article re: you may find informative on the #Koch funded effort to call an Article V Convention of States aka Constitutional Convention to amend the US Constitution. prwatch.org/news/2017/03/1…
24. BTW, the two #ALEC sponsored Article V projects—Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force & #COSProject—do not expressly refer to public education or the DOE. But they cld & almost certainly wld seek to slash them under the guise of “balancing the budget.”
25. A “Balanced Budget” is a goal not only of the Article V Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force, But also of the broader & even more radical Article V Convention of States Project (#COSProject). conventionofstates.nationbuilder.com/ok_cos
26. Here’s an article explaining the difficulty states would have if federal funding of education were slashed. americanprogress.org/issues/educati…
27. I do not mean to suggest that “only” education spending would be slashed. Social security, Medicare, Medicaid, & the EPA would also be gutted under the proposed Balanced Budget Amendment to the US Constitution!
28. I focused on education in this Thread because it occurs to me that local educators might have a strong interest in this specific aspect, & I’m not getting the type of local response I’d like with broader messaging.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/