This opinion piece says that paper summary cards from touchscreen barcode ballot markers like the ES&S ExpressVote and Dominion ImageCast—are better than #handmarked#paperballots. It is 100% vendor propaganda. 1/ realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/…
I shoot down every single one of the author’s points—w/ citations—in this article. I hope u will read both and compare and let me know what you think. We should also investigate whether the author has ties to a vendor or has simply been misled himself. 2/ medium.com/@jennycohn1/st…
Thank you to @Joyce_Hackett for bringing this alarming piece to my attention. I will try to find time to prepare a reply and submit it to Real Clear Politics.3/ #ProtectOurVotes
PS. I should have been more clear. Not only are summary cards from touchscreen barcode ballot markers NOT “better” than #handmarked#paperballots, they are infinitely worse from an election security standpoint, & include studies and expert quotes to explain this in my article. 4/
For those who hate reading articles, here is my Twitter thread explaining why these barcoded summary cards are so bad. Pls note that the article expanded and improved on this Thread, though the Thread covers much of it. 6/
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/