3. Please note that the current Georgia bill would not require paper until 2019. Let the Voting and Technology Subcommittee know that this is unacceptable. Virginia was able to get paper in short order. Georgia must do the same.
4. If officials claim they "can't" buy optical scanners that quickly, then tell them they must hand count the 2018 midterm elections. Here is my sourced Thread re: New Hampshire counties that hand count ballots averaging 15 items, all on Election Night.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
5. Finally, don't forget to demand manual risk limiting audits for every single race. Per experts, there is no other audit procedure sufficient to detect hacking. Good luck, and let me know how it goes! #paperballots#paperballotsnow#ProtectOurVotes
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
6. P.S. If u are told that Risk Limiting Audits ("RLAs") wld be too difficult to implement by 2018, push back. There are 2 types of RLA's: comparison audits & ballot polling audits. Ballot polling audits require no extra equipment & CAN be done by the midterms. cc: @philipbstark
7. Don't forget to mention what Nikki Haley just said about electronic voting machines! It's pure gold.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @TanyasTwit view original on Twitter
8.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @Thelast_try view original on Twitter
9.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @Thelast_try view original on Twitter
Please unroll. Thank you!
- please unroll. Thanks!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/