Iowa voters! The Iowa House has passed Joint Resolution 8 calling for an Article V Convention of States to amend the US Constitution-as desired by #ALEC & #Kochs! The senate will vote ANY DAY! Tell ur state senators 2 vote NO! Contact info & more below #NoConCon#KochBrothers 1/
Alarmingly, #JR8 had BIPARTISAN support in the IA House. Still, u probably should focus on Senate Republicans first. Here is a list w/ their names & numbers. Tell them u will #VoteThemOut if they vote for a Convention of States! iowasenaterepublicans.com/senators/ 2/
Next, you should convey the same message—vote NO on #JR8 or we will #Vote you out—to the Democratic leadership in the Iowa Senate. Here are their names & numbers. senate.iowa.gov/democrats/sena… 3/
Here is a link to #JR8 calling for Iowa to join the push for an Article V Convention of States to amend the US Constitution aka Constitutional Convention. #NoConConlegis.iowa.gov/legislation/Bi… 4/
The #KochBrothers and their legislative arm called #ALEC (which drafts model legislation) are behind the push for an Article V Convention of States aka Constitutional Convention. #NoConConprwatch.org/news/2017/03/1… 5/
Here is an article re: the three dangerous groups calling for a Convention of States aka #ConCon. #JR8 in Iowa came from the group seeking the broadest changes (tho all 3 seek to eliminate SS, Medicare, EPA, & DOE based on a Balanced Budget Amendment). billmoyers.com/story/alec-con… 6/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jennycohn1 view original on Twitter
7/
I discussed #JR8 with @iowademocrats which confirmed a senate vote could occur any day between now and the end of the month! 8/
So please call! And don’t believe them when they say they just want to “balance the budget”! They plan to achieve such “balance” by eliminating the key government agencies (EPA, DOE, etc) & federal programs (SS, Medicare, etc) referenced above. 9/
Don’t believe them if they say they seek only a “Convention of States,” not a “Constitutional Convention”! This is a semantic trick! The so-called “Convention of States” seeks to amend the US Constitution & is thus for all practical purposes a “Constitutional Convention”! 10/
Likewise, don’t believe them if they say the Convention of States would be narrowly limited. Read what the Hawaii AG had to say about the possibility of it turning into an anything-goes #ConCon.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @JayRiestenberg view original on Twitter
Study shows that people of all political persuasions are willing to modify their beliefs based on corrective info from reliable sources, but “subjects ‘re-believed’ the false info when retested a week later.” 1/ news.northeastern.edu/2018/06/18/tir…
2/ The author of the article says It may help to warn people in advance that they are likely to forget the correction bc “this helps them mentally tag the bogus information as false.”
3/ It’s also “important that the corrective information be repeated as frequently, and with even greater clarity, than the myth.”
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but elections have been electronically suspect starting long before the Trump/Russia scandal. This article is lulling folks into a false sense of security, which is dangerous. Domestic hackers & insiders were always an equal threat. 1/
I agree, tho not enuf time (and 0 political will) to do this in Nov. Wish it were different. For now I hope to stop states from doubling up on electronics w/ touchscreen ballot markers. Using electronics to count votes is bad enuf. Having them mark our ballots too is nuts. 1/
Nuts except for those who are unable to hand mark their ballots. Once you have hand marked paper ballots they can be either scanned or hand counted (my preference) or both. 2/
Any time u put a machine between the voter and the paper record of voter intent there is an opportunity for programming mischief. Here is just the latest example.: 3/
I’m hoping some of the cyber experts who signed the letter about the risks of using cellular modems to transfer election results can answer this question. Thx! @philipbstark@SEGreenhalgh@rad_atl@jhalderm
Seeing as no one has answered yet, I will say that even if the cellular modems CAN be configured to bypass the internet, we should not have to blindly trust that vendors or whoever else is hired to set them up will do that.
Kathy Rogers, the face & voice of @ESSVote, which has installed CELLULAR MODEMS in tabulators in WI & FL, is cozying up to @DHSgov which refuses to advise states to remove the modems despite a letter from 30 cyber experts & EI groups stating it should do so. #CorruptElections 1/
The notion that cellular modems affect only “unofficial” results is bogus bc, among other reasons, in certain jurisdictions, unofficial results become the official results once added to absentees & provisionals—sometimes w/o ever comparing them to the precinct results tapes! 1/
And Wisconsin doesn’t even require that counties publicly post the results tapes so that the public itself can make this comparison! (I don’t know about Florida, Michigan, & Illinois.) 2/
Thus, we must simply trust that someone trustworthy is conducting this due diligence. In Johnson County, Kansas, the County acknowledged that it does NOT conduct this basic due diligence. 3/